电蜂鸣线评价儿童手眼协调和物体控制能力的研制与应用:可行性研究

Q2 Health Professions Human Movement Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/hm.2022.109072
G. Luvizutto, A. Bruno, S. Oliveira, M. Silva, Luciane Souza
{"title":"电蜂鸣线评价儿童手眼协调和物体控制能力的研制与应用:可行性研究","authors":"G. Luvizutto, A. Bruno, S. Oliveira, M. Silva, Luciane Souza","doi":"10.5114/hm.2022.109072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. There are many instruments to test children’s motor coordination, but the problem is that none of them evaluates accuracy and precision during motor tasks. Therefore, the aim of the study was to develop and test the applicability of electrical buzz wire (EBW) as an instrument for assessing eye-hand coordination and object control skill in children, as well as to delimit the mean time and errors in tasks involving speed and/or accuracy. Methods. The cross-sectional study involved 66 children (28 boys and 38 girls) aged 7–12 years. The variables evaluated were anthropometrics, hand dominance, and Movement Assessment Battery for children (MABc-2). The outcomes were time (s) and error ( n ) during 4 tasks while changing speed and wire loop size. Results. The ANOVA analysis showed statistically significant differences in the time variable [F(4, 502) = 8.6155, p < 0.001] and in the error [F(6, 502) = 69.209, p < 0.001]. The mean values of time and errors in each task were standardized after linear regression: 2.38 errors and 37 seconds in task 1; 3.2 errors and 35 seconds in task 2; 6.4 errors and 24 seconds in task 3; and 6.4 errors and 23.1 seconds in task 4. The error and time variables in EBW presented weak negative correlations with all MABc-2 domains. Conclusions. EBW was developed; the time and errors with a comfortable speed were lower than with a high speed, regardless of the difficulty level. Time and error values were also standardized in this age group.","PeriodicalId":35354,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and application of an electrical buzz wire to evaluate eye-hand coordination and object control skill in children: a feasibility study\",\"authors\":\"G. Luvizutto, A. Bruno, S. Oliveira, M. Silva, Luciane Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/hm.2022.109072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose. There are many instruments to test children’s motor coordination, but the problem is that none of them evaluates accuracy and precision during motor tasks. Therefore, the aim of the study was to develop and test the applicability of electrical buzz wire (EBW) as an instrument for assessing eye-hand coordination and object control skill in children, as well as to delimit the mean time and errors in tasks involving speed and/or accuracy. Methods. The cross-sectional study involved 66 children (28 boys and 38 girls) aged 7–12 years. The variables evaluated were anthropometrics, hand dominance, and Movement Assessment Battery for children (MABc-2). The outcomes were time (s) and error ( n ) during 4 tasks while changing speed and wire loop size. Results. The ANOVA analysis showed statistically significant differences in the time variable [F(4, 502) = 8.6155, p < 0.001] and in the error [F(6, 502) = 69.209, p < 0.001]. The mean values of time and errors in each task were standardized after linear regression: 2.38 errors and 37 seconds in task 1; 3.2 errors and 35 seconds in task 2; 6.4 errors and 24 seconds in task 3; and 6.4 errors and 23.1 seconds in task 4. The error and time variables in EBW presented weak negative correlations with all MABc-2 domains. Conclusions. EBW was developed; the time and errors with a comfortable speed were lower than with a high speed, regardless of the difficulty level. Time and error values were also standardized in this age group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Movement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Movement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2022.109072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2022.109072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的。有很多工具可以测试儿童的运动协调能力,但问题是没有一种工具可以评估运动任务中的准确性和精确性。因此,本研究的目的是开发和测试电子嗡嗡声线(EBW)作为评估儿童手眼协调和物体控制技能的工具的适用性,以及确定涉及速度和/或准确性的任务的平均时间和错误。方法。横断面研究涉及66名7-12岁的儿童(28名男孩和38名女孩)。评估的变量包括人体测量学、手部优势和儿童运动评估组(MABc-2)。结果是在改变速度和线圈大小的情况下,4个任务的时间(s)和误差(n)。结果。方差分析显示,时间变量[F(4,502) = 8.6155, p < 0.001]和误差[F(6,502) = 69.209, p < 0.001]差异均有统计学意义。各任务的时间和误差均值经线性回归标准化:任务1误差2.38,误差37秒;任务2出现3.2个错误,用时35秒;任务3出错6.4次,用时24秒;任务4出错6.4次,用时23.1秒。EBW的误差和时间变量与所有MABc-2结构域呈弱负相关。结论。开发了EBW;无论难度高低,舒适速度下的时间和误差均低于高速。该年龄组的时间和误差值也进行了标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and application of an electrical buzz wire to evaluate eye-hand coordination and object control skill in children: a feasibility study
Purpose. There are many instruments to test children’s motor coordination, but the problem is that none of them evaluates accuracy and precision during motor tasks. Therefore, the aim of the study was to develop and test the applicability of electrical buzz wire (EBW) as an instrument for assessing eye-hand coordination and object control skill in children, as well as to delimit the mean time and errors in tasks involving speed and/or accuracy. Methods. The cross-sectional study involved 66 children (28 boys and 38 girls) aged 7–12 years. The variables evaluated were anthropometrics, hand dominance, and Movement Assessment Battery for children (MABc-2). The outcomes were time (s) and error ( n ) during 4 tasks while changing speed and wire loop size. Results. The ANOVA analysis showed statistically significant differences in the time variable [F(4, 502) = 8.6155, p < 0.001] and in the error [F(6, 502) = 69.209, p < 0.001]. The mean values of time and errors in each task were standardized after linear regression: 2.38 errors and 37 seconds in task 1; 3.2 errors and 35 seconds in task 2; 6.4 errors and 24 seconds in task 3; and 6.4 errors and 23.1 seconds in task 4. The error and time variables in EBW presented weak negative correlations with all MABc-2 domains. Conclusions. EBW was developed; the time and errors with a comfortable speed were lower than with a high speed, regardless of the difficulty level. Time and error values were also standardized in this age group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Movement
Human Movement Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Postural control and ankle joint functions: an investigation on collegiate female volleyball players Assessment of the correlation between the occurrence of fine movements of the hand, pre-frailty, and body composition in the elderly Does the direction of shapes and bodies influence the aesthetic perception of stage setups in dance? Adhesive elastic tape modifies forefoot motion in young women with flatfoot Performance enhancing strategies in sailing sports: beyond training and nutrition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1