巴西外科医生的抽脂实践

G. Souza, S. Costa, M. Resende, C. S. Sobral, L. Ferreira
{"title":"巴西外科医生的抽脂实践","authors":"G. Souza, S. Costa, M. Resende, C. S. Sobral, L. Ferreira","doi":"10.5935/2177-1235.2018rbcp0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 Hospital Felício Rocho, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. 2 Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Conflicts of interest: none. Introduction: Since the 1980s, with Illouz, liposuction has gained popularity and represents one of the most commonly performed procedures in the world today. Some of the complications are serious and potentially lethal. Nevertheless, uniformity in its practice or the manner in which it is taught does not exist. Evaluating techniques employed by plastic surgeons may be the start toward standardization. Methods: A questionnaire on liposuction was given to plastic surgeons of different age groups and from regions of Brazil who were present at the 52nd Brazilian Conference for Plastic Surgery. Results: Two hundred forty-three questionnaires were filled out (n = 243). The average number of incisions was 9 (2–16). Two hundred fortyone surgeons (99%) made incisions along the anterior median/ paramedian line, and 236 (97%) made incisions on the posterior median/paramedian line. Approximately half of those surveyed utilized general anesthesia. Two hundred nine surgeons (86%) placed the patient in the prone position during the procedure. One hundred forty-six (60%) interviewees performed superficial liposuction, with 22 (9%) performing liposuction only on this adipose layer. Eighty-five (35%) participants reported controlling the apparatus’s pressure during the procedure. Conclusion: Liposuction procedures performed in Brazil have significant technical variations. This finding encourages us to reflect on the need to standardize liposuction practice and the manner in which it is taught so as to increase control over the procedure and its safety. ■ ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":79099,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de cirurgia","volume":"33 1","pages":"181-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liposuction Practices among Brazilian Surgeons\",\"authors\":\"G. Souza, S. Costa, M. Resende, C. S. Sobral, L. Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/2177-1235.2018rbcp0093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1 Hospital Felício Rocho, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. 2 Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Conflicts of interest: none. Introduction: Since the 1980s, with Illouz, liposuction has gained popularity and represents one of the most commonly performed procedures in the world today. Some of the complications are serious and potentially lethal. Nevertheless, uniformity in its practice or the manner in which it is taught does not exist. Evaluating techniques employed by plastic surgeons may be the start toward standardization. Methods: A questionnaire on liposuction was given to plastic surgeons of different age groups and from regions of Brazil who were present at the 52nd Brazilian Conference for Plastic Surgery. Results: Two hundred forty-three questionnaires were filled out (n = 243). The average number of incisions was 9 (2–16). Two hundred fortyone surgeons (99%) made incisions along the anterior median/ paramedian line, and 236 (97%) made incisions on the posterior median/paramedian line. Approximately half of those surveyed utilized general anesthesia. Two hundred nine surgeons (86%) placed the patient in the prone position during the procedure. One hundred forty-six (60%) interviewees performed superficial liposuction, with 22 (9%) performing liposuction only on this adipose layer. Eighty-five (35%) participants reported controlling the apparatus’s pressure during the procedure. Conclusion: Liposuction procedures performed in Brazil have significant technical variations. This finding encourages us to reflect on the need to standardize liposuction practice and the manner in which it is taught so as to increase control over the procedure and its safety. ■ ABSTRACT\",\"PeriodicalId\":79099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de cirurgia\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"181-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de cirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-1235.2018rbcp0093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de cirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-1235.2018rbcp0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1医院Felício罗乔,贝洛奥里藏特,MG,巴西。2联邦大学圣保罗大学,圣保罗,SP,巴西。利益冲突:没有。简介:自20世纪80年代以来,随着伊洛兹,吸脂术越来越受欢迎,成为当今世界上最常见的手术之一。有些并发症很严重,甚至可能致命。然而,它的实践或教学方式的一致性并不存在。评估整形外科医生使用的技术可能是标准化的开始。方法:对参加第52届巴西整形外科大会的巴西各地区不同年龄段的整形外科医生进行抽脂问卷调查。结果:共填写问卷243份(n = 243)。平均切口数为9(2 ~ 16)。241名外科医生(99%)沿前正中/旁正中线切口,236名(97%)沿后正中/旁正中线切口。大约一半的受访者使用全身麻醉。209名外科医生(86%)在手术过程中将患者置于俯卧位。146名(60%)受访者进行了浅表吸脂,22名(9%)仅在这一脂肪层进行吸脂。85名(35%)参与者报告在手术过程中控制了仪器的压力。结论:在巴西进行的吸脂手术有明显的技术差异。这一发现鼓励我们思考是否有必要将抽脂手术和教学方式标准化,以加强对手术过程及其安全性的控制。■文摘
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Liposuction Practices among Brazilian Surgeons
1 Hospital Felício Rocho, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. 2 Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Conflicts of interest: none. Introduction: Since the 1980s, with Illouz, liposuction has gained popularity and represents one of the most commonly performed procedures in the world today. Some of the complications are serious and potentially lethal. Nevertheless, uniformity in its practice or the manner in which it is taught does not exist. Evaluating techniques employed by plastic surgeons may be the start toward standardization. Methods: A questionnaire on liposuction was given to plastic surgeons of different age groups and from regions of Brazil who were present at the 52nd Brazilian Conference for Plastic Surgery. Results: Two hundred forty-three questionnaires were filled out (n = 243). The average number of incisions was 9 (2–16). Two hundred fortyone surgeons (99%) made incisions along the anterior median/ paramedian line, and 236 (97%) made incisions on the posterior median/paramedian line. Approximately half of those surveyed utilized general anesthesia. Two hundred nine surgeons (86%) placed the patient in the prone position during the procedure. One hundred forty-six (60%) interviewees performed superficial liposuction, with 22 (9%) performing liposuction only on this adipose layer. Eighty-five (35%) participants reported controlling the apparatus’s pressure during the procedure. Conclusion: Liposuction procedures performed in Brazil have significant technical variations. This finding encourages us to reflect on the need to standardize liposuction practice and the manner in which it is taught so as to increase control over the procedure and its safety. ■ ABSTRACT
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermoguided technique of lipolysis and skin retraction with 980nm diode laser Viability of mesenchymal stem cells of adipose tissue from human liposuction Systematization of reconstruction of the abdominal wall after reconstruction with TRAM Simple and composite circumferential abdominoplasty: technical evolution, 10-year experience and analysis of complications Reconstruction after bipalpebral resection with preservation of the eyeball: aesthetic and functional challenge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1