突出耳部矫正手术技术的比较:mustard与Converse

M. F. M. B. Lima, Pablo Maricevich, K. Kawamura, Priscila da Silva Lopes, A. Freire, Rafael Anlicoara
{"title":"突出耳部矫正手术技术的比较:mustard<s:1>与Converse","authors":"M. F. M. B. Lima, Pablo Maricevich, K. Kawamura, Priscila da Silva Lopes, A. Freire, Rafael Anlicoara","doi":"10.5935/2177-1235.2020rbcp0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: prominent ears, popularly called “flappy ears,” represent the most common congenital deformity of the external ear, affecting approximately 5% of the population. Methods: Primary, prospective and intervention study comparing the results of patients undergoing the surgical procedure to correct prominent ears using the Converse and the Mustardé techniques, performed at the Plastic Surgery Service of the Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Pernambuco (HC) -UFPE). Results: Twenty patients were evaluated, 10 with the Converse technique, and 10 with the Mustardé technique, from June 2016 to December 2017. Both groups showed a decrease in auricular mastoid distances at the end of the observation period, ranging from 6.67 to 14.6 mm, depending on the surgical technique and the evaluation point, but without statistical significance. Regarding the average auricular mastoid distances at the end of the observation period, a difference of a maximum of 6.3 mm was observed between the evaluated groups, but without statistical significance. Regarding the symmetry of the ears within the same group, the maximum mean level of asymmetry in the Mustardé and Converse groups was 0.9 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively. However, the percentage of loss of correction of the measures obtained surgically during the observation period in both groups ranged between 15 and 19%, without statistical significance. Regarding complications, there was 1 (10%) case of hematoma in the Mustardé group. Conclusion: Converse and Mustardé techniques did not show statistical differences in the results. ■ ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":79099,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de cirurgia","volume":"35 1","pages":"154-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of surgical techniques for prominent ear correction: Mustardé versus\\n Converse\",\"authors\":\"M. F. M. B. Lima, Pablo Maricevich, K. Kawamura, Priscila da Silva Lopes, A. Freire, Rafael Anlicoara\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/2177-1235.2020rbcp0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: prominent ears, popularly called “flappy ears,” represent the most common congenital deformity of the external ear, affecting approximately 5% of the population. Methods: Primary, prospective and intervention study comparing the results of patients undergoing the surgical procedure to correct prominent ears using the Converse and the Mustardé techniques, performed at the Plastic Surgery Service of the Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Pernambuco (HC) -UFPE). Results: Twenty patients were evaluated, 10 with the Converse technique, and 10 with the Mustardé technique, from June 2016 to December 2017. Both groups showed a decrease in auricular mastoid distances at the end of the observation period, ranging from 6.67 to 14.6 mm, depending on the surgical technique and the evaluation point, but without statistical significance. Regarding the average auricular mastoid distances at the end of the observation period, a difference of a maximum of 6.3 mm was observed between the evaluated groups, but without statistical significance. Regarding the symmetry of the ears within the same group, the maximum mean level of asymmetry in the Mustardé and Converse groups was 0.9 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively. However, the percentage of loss of correction of the measures obtained surgically during the observation period in both groups ranged between 15 and 19%, without statistical significance. Regarding complications, there was 1 (10%) case of hematoma in the Mustardé group. Conclusion: Converse and Mustardé techniques did not show statistical differences in the results. ■ ABSTRACT\",\"PeriodicalId\":79099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de cirurgia\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"154-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de cirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-1235.2020rbcp0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de cirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-1235.2020rbcp0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:突出的耳朵,俗称“flappy ears”,代表了最常见的先天性外耳畸形,影响了大约5%的人口。方法:在伯南布哥联邦大学整形外科医院Clínicas (HC) -UFPE进行了初步、前瞻性和干预研究,比较了使用Converse和mustard技术进行手术矫正突出耳的患者的结果。结果:2016年6月至2017年12月对20例患者进行评估,其中10例采用Converse技术,10例采用mustard技术。观察结束时,两组耳廓乳突距离随手术技术和评价点的不同而减小,范围为6.67 ~ 14.6 mm,但无统计学意义。观察期末平均耳乳突距离,两组间差异最大为6.3 mm,但无统计学意义。对于同一组内耳朵的对称性,mustard组和Converse组的最大平均不对称性分别为0.9 mm和0.5 mm。然而,在观察期间,两组手术矫正措施的损失百分比在15 - 19%之间,无统计学意义。至于并发症,芥末酱组有1例(10%)血肿。结论:Converse技术与mustard技术在结果上无统计学差异。■文摘
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of surgical techniques for prominent ear correction: Mustardé versus Converse
Introduction: prominent ears, popularly called “flappy ears,” represent the most common congenital deformity of the external ear, affecting approximately 5% of the population. Methods: Primary, prospective and intervention study comparing the results of patients undergoing the surgical procedure to correct prominent ears using the Converse and the Mustardé techniques, performed at the Plastic Surgery Service of the Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Pernambuco (HC) -UFPE). Results: Twenty patients were evaluated, 10 with the Converse technique, and 10 with the Mustardé technique, from June 2016 to December 2017. Both groups showed a decrease in auricular mastoid distances at the end of the observation period, ranging from 6.67 to 14.6 mm, depending on the surgical technique and the evaluation point, but without statistical significance. Regarding the average auricular mastoid distances at the end of the observation period, a difference of a maximum of 6.3 mm was observed between the evaluated groups, but without statistical significance. Regarding the symmetry of the ears within the same group, the maximum mean level of asymmetry in the Mustardé and Converse groups was 0.9 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively. However, the percentage of loss of correction of the measures obtained surgically during the observation period in both groups ranged between 15 and 19%, without statistical significance. Regarding complications, there was 1 (10%) case of hematoma in the Mustardé group. Conclusion: Converse and Mustardé techniques did not show statistical differences in the results. ■ ABSTRACT
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermoguided technique of lipolysis and skin retraction with 980nm diode laser Viability of mesenchymal stem cells of adipose tissue from human liposuction Systematization of reconstruction of the abdominal wall after reconstruction with TRAM Simple and composite circumferential abdominoplasty: technical evolution, 10-year experience and analysis of complications Reconstruction after bipalpebral resection with preservation of the eyeball: aesthetic and functional challenge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1