2019冠状病毒病与远程学习:家庭和学校

Q4 Social Sciences Philosophical Inquiry in Education Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.7202/1088380ar
N. Friesen
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病与远程学习:家庭和学校","authors":"N. Friesen","doi":"10.7202/1088380ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One area that is almost certain to be of some concern in the coming wave of COVID-related publications is the question of home versus school as “learning environments” – as specifiable sets of conditions for facilitating and shaping the ongoing learning process. “Learning,” in turn, is conventionally understood as a neurological and cognitive process that occurs all the time, with institutional learning environments cultivating more formal and regulated learning, but hardly erasing its original, “natural” characteristics. Home and school, however, are much more than just different cognitive environments;they represent heterogeneous, even mutually exclusive social and cultural systems, spheres, or worlds. Each is characterized by its own roles, relations, habits, and experiences. Given that this article appears in a philosophical forum, it takes as its focus an original philosophical treatment of the question of the domestic and scholastic spheres: Hegel’s previously untranslated remarks from an 1811 graduation address to a school in Nuremberg. Besides introducing a “new” Hegel text to English-language readers, the overview that follows also sheds light on a particular way of contrasting school and family life. © 2022, Canadian Philosophy Education Society. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":36151,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 and Remote Learning: The Home and the School\",\"authors\":\"N. Friesen\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1088380ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One area that is almost certain to be of some concern in the coming wave of COVID-related publications is the question of home versus school as “learning environments” – as specifiable sets of conditions for facilitating and shaping the ongoing learning process. “Learning,” in turn, is conventionally understood as a neurological and cognitive process that occurs all the time, with institutional learning environments cultivating more formal and regulated learning, but hardly erasing its original, “natural” characteristics. Home and school, however, are much more than just different cognitive environments;they represent heterogeneous, even mutually exclusive social and cultural systems, spheres, or worlds. Each is characterized by its own roles, relations, habits, and experiences. Given that this article appears in a philosophical forum, it takes as its focus an original philosophical treatment of the question of the domestic and scholastic spheres: Hegel’s previously untranslated remarks from an 1811 graduation address to a school in Nuremberg. Besides introducing a “new” Hegel text to English-language readers, the overview that follows also sheds light on a particular way of contrasting school and family life. © 2022, Canadian Philosophy Education Society. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Inquiry in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Inquiry in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1088380ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1088380ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在即将到来的新冠肺炎相关出版物中,几乎肯定会引起一些关注的一个领域是家庭与学校作为“学习环境”的问题——作为促进和塑造正在进行的学习过程的一系列具体条件。反过来,“学习”通常被理解为一种每时每刻都在发生的神经学和认知过程,制度化的学习环境培养了更正式、更规范的学习,但很难抹去其原始的、“自然”的特征。然而,家庭和学校不仅仅是不同的认知环境;它们代表着异质的,甚至是相互排斥的社会和文化系统、领域或世界。每个人都有自己的角色、关系、习惯和经历。鉴于这篇文章出现在一个哲学论坛上,它的重点是对家庭和学术领域问题的原始哲学处理:黑格尔在1811年纽伦堡一所学校的毕业演讲中先前未翻译的评论。除了向英语读者介绍黑格尔的“新”文本外,接下来的概述还揭示了一种对比学校和家庭生活的特殊方式。©2022,加拿大哲学教育学会。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 and Remote Learning: The Home and the School
One area that is almost certain to be of some concern in the coming wave of COVID-related publications is the question of home versus school as “learning environments” – as specifiable sets of conditions for facilitating and shaping the ongoing learning process. “Learning,” in turn, is conventionally understood as a neurological and cognitive process that occurs all the time, with institutional learning environments cultivating more formal and regulated learning, but hardly erasing its original, “natural” characteristics. Home and school, however, are much more than just different cognitive environments;they represent heterogeneous, even mutually exclusive social and cultural systems, spheres, or worlds. Each is characterized by its own roles, relations, habits, and experiences. Given that this article appears in a philosophical forum, it takes as its focus an original philosophical treatment of the question of the domestic and scholastic spheres: Hegel’s previously untranslated remarks from an 1811 graduation address to a school in Nuremberg. Besides introducing a “new” Hegel text to English-language readers, the overview that follows also sheds light on a particular way of contrasting school and family life. © 2022, Canadian Philosophy Education Society. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophical Inquiry in Education
Philosophical Inquiry in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Education after COVID Promoting Critical Thinking in Anti-Critical Thinking Times: Lessons from COVID Discourse When the Façade of the Normal Falls Away Demoralization and Remoralization: The Power of Creating Space for Teachers’ Moral Centres Pandemic Resurrection: Making Gendered Citizenship Visible in a “Postfeminist” Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1