肾外伤的临床特点和处理:一项单中心观察性研究

VEnkAtA RAngA SwAmy, D. Reddy, Raja Sekhar Guddeti, Mutyasri Pedapathnapu
{"title":"肾外伤的临床特点和处理:一项单中心观察性研究","authors":"VEnkAtA RAngA SwAmy, D. Reddy, Raja Sekhar Guddeti, Mutyasri Pedapathnapu","doi":"10.7860/ijars/2023/57478.2857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The management of renal trauma includes operative and non operative approach based on clinical profile of patient. However, management of the high-grade renal trauma remains controversial. Aim: To evaluate mode of renal injury, staging and its management outcomes. Materials and Methods: This prospective, observational study included 49 patients (>15 years of age) who presented with abdominal trauma. Computed tomography was performed for grading of renal trauma. The patients were stratified based on whether they underwent open renal surgery or conservative management for their renal injury. Demographic characteristics and a detailed history of renal injuries were recorded. The patients were evaluated based on the rate of renal preservation and complications at 6-month follow-up. Results: The mean age was 32.10 years and majority of the patients were males (87.76%). Blunt trauma (95.92%) was most frequently reported. According to American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), 8 (16.33%) patients were categorized in grade I, 17 (34.69%) patients in grade II, 8 (16.33%) patients in grade III, 12 (24.49%) patients in grade IV, and 4 (8.16%) patients in grade V. Microscopic haematuria (42.86%) was the most common clinical presentation. The majority of the patients were managed conservatively (89.8%). Only two belonging to grade 4 and three from grade 5 were managed operatively due to haemodynamic instability. Rib fractures (n=10) were the most frequently associated injury, and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (n=8) was the most common complication, followed by persistent haematuria (n=3), and hypertension (n=3). All patients with grades I to III showed 100% renal preservation rate with conservative management. However, patients with grades IV and V showed renal preservation rate of 83.33% and 50%, respectively. Conclusion: Conservative treatment is a preferred choice of treatment in the most of the renal trauma. The present study reported high renal preservation rate in low-grade renal injuries, which were managed conservatively. However, there is still need of surgical treatment in high grade haemodynamically unstable patients.","PeriodicalId":56235,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Characteristics and Management of Renal Trauma: A Single-centre Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"VEnkAtA RAngA SwAmy, D. Reddy, Raja Sekhar Guddeti, Mutyasri Pedapathnapu\",\"doi\":\"10.7860/ijars/2023/57478.2857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The management of renal trauma includes operative and non operative approach based on clinical profile of patient. However, management of the high-grade renal trauma remains controversial. Aim: To evaluate mode of renal injury, staging and its management outcomes. Materials and Methods: This prospective, observational study included 49 patients (>15 years of age) who presented with abdominal trauma. Computed tomography was performed for grading of renal trauma. The patients were stratified based on whether they underwent open renal surgery or conservative management for their renal injury. Demographic characteristics and a detailed history of renal injuries were recorded. The patients were evaluated based on the rate of renal preservation and complications at 6-month follow-up. Results: The mean age was 32.10 years and majority of the patients were males (87.76%). Blunt trauma (95.92%) was most frequently reported. According to American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), 8 (16.33%) patients were categorized in grade I, 17 (34.69%) patients in grade II, 8 (16.33%) patients in grade III, 12 (24.49%) patients in grade IV, and 4 (8.16%) patients in grade V. Microscopic haematuria (42.86%) was the most common clinical presentation. The majority of the patients were managed conservatively (89.8%). Only two belonging to grade 4 and three from grade 5 were managed operatively due to haemodynamic instability. Rib fractures (n=10) were the most frequently associated injury, and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (n=8) was the most common complication, followed by persistent haematuria (n=3), and hypertension (n=3). All patients with grades I to III showed 100% renal preservation rate with conservative management. However, patients with grades IV and V showed renal preservation rate of 83.33% and 50%, respectively. Conclusion: Conservative treatment is a preferred choice of treatment in the most of the renal trauma. The present study reported high renal preservation rate in low-grade renal injuries, which were managed conservatively. However, there is still need of surgical treatment in high grade haemodynamically unstable patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijars/2023/57478.2857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijars/2023/57478.2857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:肾外伤的治疗根据患者的临床情况分为手术治疗和非手术治疗。然而,高级别肾外伤的处理仍然存在争议。目的:探讨肾损伤的模式、分期及治疗效果。材料和方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了49例(年龄0 ~ 15岁)腹部外伤患者。采用计算机断层扫描对肾损伤进行分级。根据患者是否接受开放肾手术或保守治疗对其肾损伤进行分层。记录患者的人口学特征和肾损伤的详细病史。在6个月的随访中,根据肾脏保存率和并发症对患者进行评估。结果:患者平均年龄32.10岁,男性居多(87.76%)。最常见的是钝挫伤(95.92%)。根据美国创伤外科协会(AAST)的数据,8例(16.33%)患者为I级,17例(34.69%)为II级,8例(16.33%)为III级,12例(24.49%)为IV级,4例(8.16%)为v级。镜下血尿(42.86%)是最常见的临床表现。大多数患者采用保守治疗(89.8%)。由于血流动力学不稳定,只有2例属于4级和3例来自5级的患者进行了手术治疗。肋骨骨折(n=10)是最常见的相关损伤,尿路感染(n=8)是最常见的并发症,其次是持续血尿(n=3)和高血压(n=3)。所有I ~ III级患者在保守治疗下肾脏保存率均为100%。IV级和V级患者的肾脏保存率分别为83.33%和50%。结论:保守治疗是大多数肾外伤的首选治疗方法。本研究报告了低级别肾损伤的高肾保存率,并对其进行了保守处理。然而,对于高度血流动力学不稳定的患者,仍然需要手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Characteristics and Management of Renal Trauma: A Single-centre Observational Study
Introduction: The management of renal trauma includes operative and non operative approach based on clinical profile of patient. However, management of the high-grade renal trauma remains controversial. Aim: To evaluate mode of renal injury, staging and its management outcomes. Materials and Methods: This prospective, observational study included 49 patients (>15 years of age) who presented with abdominal trauma. Computed tomography was performed for grading of renal trauma. The patients were stratified based on whether they underwent open renal surgery or conservative management for their renal injury. Demographic characteristics and a detailed history of renal injuries were recorded. The patients were evaluated based on the rate of renal preservation and complications at 6-month follow-up. Results: The mean age was 32.10 years and majority of the patients were males (87.76%). Blunt trauma (95.92%) was most frequently reported. According to American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), 8 (16.33%) patients were categorized in grade I, 17 (34.69%) patients in grade II, 8 (16.33%) patients in grade III, 12 (24.49%) patients in grade IV, and 4 (8.16%) patients in grade V. Microscopic haematuria (42.86%) was the most common clinical presentation. The majority of the patients were managed conservatively (89.8%). Only two belonging to grade 4 and three from grade 5 were managed operatively due to haemodynamic instability. Rib fractures (n=10) were the most frequently associated injury, and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (n=8) was the most common complication, followed by persistent haematuria (n=3), and hypertension (n=3). All patients with grades I to III showed 100% renal preservation rate with conservative management. However, patients with grades IV and V showed renal preservation rate of 83.33% and 50%, respectively. Conclusion: Conservative treatment is a preferred choice of treatment in the most of the renal trauma. The present study reported high renal preservation rate in low-grade renal injuries, which were managed conservatively. However, there is still need of surgical treatment in high grade haemodynamically unstable patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tibial Periosteal Ganglion Cyst: A Rare Case of Non Traumatic Leg Swelling Mylohyoid Bridging of the Mandible and its Clinical Importance in Dry Mandibles: A Cross-sectional Study Accuracy of Ultrasound Imaging Findings in Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses: A Cross-sectional Study Morphometric Study of Different Orbital Dimensions in Dry Skull in Eastern India- A Cross-sectional Study Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography by Fungal Sinusitis: A Case-control Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1