马来西亚个人数据保护法,一个神秘的应用

Ali Alibeigi, A. Munir
{"title":"马来西亚个人数据保护法,一个神秘的应用","authors":"Ali Alibeigi, A. Munir","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.2531-6133/12441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Malaysia is a pioneer in drafting and executing personal data protection law among the ASEAN countries. However, the adequacy of this protection regime is questionable. This study is aimed at evaluating the aptitude of the Personal Data Protection Act (2010) (P.D.P.A.) from the application perspective. The evaluation and analysis of the application and scope of the P.D.P.A. through comparative and descriptive approaches shows that the Act has provided for a narrow scope with wide exemptions. This approach may hinder a standard personal data protection legal system for the protection of individuals’ privacy. Moreover, the P.D.P.A. will fail the adequacy test of the developed nations such as the European Union Member States.","PeriodicalId":36563,"journal":{"name":"University of Bologna Law Review","volume":"5 1","pages":"362-374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malaysian Personal Data Protection Act, a Mysterious Application\",\"authors\":\"Ali Alibeigi, A. Munir\",\"doi\":\"10.6092/ISSN.2531-6133/12441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Malaysia is a pioneer in drafting and executing personal data protection law among the ASEAN countries. However, the adequacy of this protection regime is questionable. This study is aimed at evaluating the aptitude of the Personal Data Protection Act (2010) (P.D.P.A.) from the application perspective. The evaluation and analysis of the application and scope of the P.D.P.A. through comparative and descriptive approaches shows that the Act has provided for a narrow scope with wide exemptions. This approach may hinder a standard personal data protection legal system for the protection of individuals’ privacy. Moreover, the P.D.P.A. will fail the adequacy test of the developed nations such as the European Union Member States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Bologna Law Review\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"362-374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Bologna Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.2531-6133/12441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Bologna Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.2531-6133/12441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

马来西亚是东盟国家中起草和执行个人资料保护法的先驱。然而,这种保护制度是否足够值得怀疑。本研究旨在从应用的角度评估个人资料保护法(2010)(P.D.P.A.)的适格性。通过比较和描述的方法对《公共财产保护法》的适用和范围进行评价和分析表明,该法案规定了一个狭窄的范围和广泛的豁免。这种做法可能会阻碍为保护个人隐私而建立标准的个人数据保护法律制度。此外,P.D.P.A.将无法通过欧盟成员国等发达国家的充分性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Malaysian Personal Data Protection Act, a Mysterious Application
Malaysia is a pioneer in drafting and executing personal data protection law among the ASEAN countries. However, the adequacy of this protection regime is questionable. This study is aimed at evaluating the aptitude of the Personal Data Protection Act (2010) (P.D.P.A.) from the application perspective. The evaluation and analysis of the application and scope of the P.D.P.A. through comparative and descriptive approaches shows that the Act has provided for a narrow scope with wide exemptions. This approach may hinder a standard personal data protection legal system for the protection of individuals’ privacy. Moreover, the P.D.P.A. will fail the adequacy test of the developed nations such as the European Union Member States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
University of Bologna Law Review
University of Bologna Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Securitizing Notes of Small Businesses and Needy Workers The Price of Transitional Justice: A Cost‐Benefit Analysis of its Mechanisms in Post‐Revolution Phase Is a Requirement to Wear a Mask Economically Valid During COVID-19? Constituting Over Constitutions Challenging the Undesired Outcome of FIOST Clauses on Cargo Interests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1