沙戈斯的原爆计划这是一种柏拉图的平和

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.5771/0031-8183-2015-1-3
David Meißner
{"title":"沙戈斯的原爆计划这是一种柏拉图的平和","authors":"David Meißner","doi":"10.5771/0031-8183-2015-1-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In Plato’s Sophist (247e), the Eleatic Stranger seems to propose to define being by means of the notion of dynamis. Although some recent papers have claimed that his dynamis-proposal should be taken seriously (at least as an explication of Plato’s concept of being, if not as a definition in the strict sense) it is still far from clear what this claim amounts to – especially in the case of the being of the forms. This paper shows that, regarding forms, a modal and a formal interpretation of the dynamis-proposal is possible. While the latter interpretation is preferable on philosophical and hermeneutical grounds, it seems to conflict with the principle that a form is a being by participating in the form of being. By distinguishing between direct and indirect participation in the form of being, the paper resolves this conflict, concluding that the formal interpretation of the dynamis-proposal can indeed be read as a philosophically attractive holistic explication of Plato’s concept of the being of forms.","PeriodicalId":42095,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Der Dynamis-Vorschlag im Sophistes. Überlegungen zum platonischen Seinsbegriff\",\"authors\":\"David Meißner\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/0031-8183-2015-1-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. In Plato’s Sophist (247e), the Eleatic Stranger seems to propose to define being by means of the notion of dynamis. Although some recent papers have claimed that his dynamis-proposal should be taken seriously (at least as an explication of Plato’s concept of being, if not as a definition in the strict sense) it is still far from clear what this claim amounts to – especially in the case of the being of the forms. This paper shows that, regarding forms, a modal and a formal interpretation of the dynamis-proposal is possible. While the latter interpretation is preferable on philosophical and hermeneutical grounds, it seems to conflict with the principle that a form is a being by participating in the form of being. By distinguishing between direct and indirect participation in the form of being, the paper resolves this conflict, concluding that the formal interpretation of the dynamis-proposal can indeed be read as a philosophically attractive holistic explication of Plato’s concept of the being of forms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/0031-8183-2015-1-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0031-8183-2015-1-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在柏拉图的《诡辩家》(公元前247e)中,《爱利亚陌生人》似乎建议用动力的概念来定义存在。尽管最近的一些论文声称,他的动力学建议应该认真对待(至少作为对柏拉图存在概念的解释,如果不是作为严格意义上的定义),但这一主张的意义仍然很不清楚——特别是在形式存在的情况下。本文表明,就形式而言,动态建议的模态和形式解释是可能的。虽然后一种解释在哲学和解释学的基础上更可取,但它似乎与形式是存在的原则相冲突,因为它参与了存在的形式。通过区分存在形式的直接参与和间接参与,本文解决了这一冲突,得出结论认为,对动力提议的形式解释确实可以被解读为对柏拉图形式存在概念的哲学上有吸引力的整体解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Der Dynamis-Vorschlag im Sophistes. Überlegungen zum platonischen Seinsbegriff
Abstract. In Plato’s Sophist (247e), the Eleatic Stranger seems to propose to define being by means of the notion of dynamis. Although some recent papers have claimed that his dynamis-proposal should be taken seriously (at least as an explication of Plato’s concept of being, if not as a definition in the strict sense) it is still far from clear what this claim amounts to – especially in the case of the being of the forms. This paper shows that, regarding forms, a modal and a formal interpretation of the dynamis-proposal is possible. While the latter interpretation is preferable on philosophical and hermeneutical grounds, it seems to conflict with the principle that a form is a being by participating in the form of being. By distinguishing between direct and indirect participation in the form of being, the paper resolves this conflict, concluding that the formal interpretation of the dynamis-proposal can indeed be read as a philosophically attractive holistic explication of Plato’s concept of the being of forms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Rainer Enskat, Urteil und Erfahrung. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. Zweiter Teil The information society: cause for a philosophical paradigm shift? A response to Luciano Floridi Out of the Box – into the Green and the Blue. Comments on a Post-humanist Information Society Reflections on Floridi’s “The Green and the Blue: A New Political Ontology for a Mature Information Society” Are philosophical questions open? Some thoughts about Luciano Floridi’s conception of philosophy as conceptual design and his new political ontology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1