在对人类胚胎地位的讨论中,对可能的单一劝说非常可能出现和描述

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.5771/0031-8183-2015-2-271
A. Meincke
{"title":"在对人类胚胎地位的讨论中,对可能的单一劝说非常可能出现和描述","authors":"A. Meincke","doi":"10.5771/0031-8183-2015-2-271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The argument from potentiality for embryo protection relies on the assumption of a specific developmental potential of human embryos: As human embryos under normal conditions naturally develop into beings whose strong moral status is uncontroversial, namely into human persons, they likewise enjoy strong moral status. In my paper, I endeavour to spell out the ontological foundations of the argument from potentiality and to discuss them critically in the light of new empirical findings in embryology. Particular attention is hereby paid to recent attempts to analyse the relevant notion of potentiality in terms of dispositions possessed by human embryos. I argue that, putting aside inappropriate essentialist speculations, there is no straightforward disposition of an embryo to become a person; such a disposition, if any, being rather successively generated in a multi-factored, highly context-sensitive process of biological development.","PeriodicalId":42095,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potentialität und Disposition in der Diskussion über den Status des menschlichen Embryos: Zur Ontologie des Potentialitätsarguments\",\"authors\":\"A. Meincke\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/0031-8183-2015-2-271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The argument from potentiality for embryo protection relies on the assumption of a specific developmental potential of human embryos: As human embryos under normal conditions naturally develop into beings whose strong moral status is uncontroversial, namely into human persons, they likewise enjoy strong moral status. In my paper, I endeavour to spell out the ontological foundations of the argument from potentiality and to discuss them critically in the light of new empirical findings in embryology. Particular attention is hereby paid to recent attempts to analyse the relevant notion of potentiality in terms of dispositions possessed by human embryos. I argue that, putting aside inappropriate essentialist speculations, there is no straightforward disposition of an embryo to become a person; such a disposition, if any, being rather successively generated in a multi-factored, highly context-sensitive process of biological development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/0031-8183-2015-2-271\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0031-8183-2015-2-271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要胚胎保护潜力论的论点,是基于对人类胚胎具有特定发育潜力的假设:人类胚胎在正常条件下自然发育为具有强烈道德地位的生物,即人,因此同样具有强烈的道德地位。在我的论文中,我努力阐明从潜能出发的论证的本体论基础,并根据胚胎学的新经验发现批判性地讨论它们。在此,特别注意到最近试图分析人类胚胎所拥有的倾向方面的相关潜力概念。我认为,撇开不恰当的本质主义推测不谈,胚胎没有成为人的直接倾向;这样的性格,如果有的话,是在一个多因素、高度上下文敏感的生物发育过程中连续产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Potentialität und Disposition in der Diskussion über den Status des menschlichen Embryos: Zur Ontologie des Potentialitätsarguments
Abstract. The argument from potentiality for embryo protection relies on the assumption of a specific developmental potential of human embryos: As human embryos under normal conditions naturally develop into beings whose strong moral status is uncontroversial, namely into human persons, they likewise enjoy strong moral status. In my paper, I endeavour to spell out the ontological foundations of the argument from potentiality and to discuss them critically in the light of new empirical findings in embryology. Particular attention is hereby paid to recent attempts to analyse the relevant notion of potentiality in terms of dispositions possessed by human embryos. I argue that, putting aside inappropriate essentialist speculations, there is no straightforward disposition of an embryo to become a person; such a disposition, if any, being rather successively generated in a multi-factored, highly context-sensitive process of biological development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Rainer Enskat, Urteil und Erfahrung. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. Zweiter Teil The information society: cause for a philosophical paradigm shift? A response to Luciano Floridi Out of the Box – into the Green and the Blue. Comments on a Post-humanist Information Society Reflections on Floridi’s “The Green and the Blue: A New Political Ontology for a Mature Information Society” Are philosophical questions open? Some thoughts about Luciano Floridi’s conception of philosophy as conceptual design and his new political ontology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1