鼻内窥镜手术后高渗盐水与等渗盐水鼻腔冲洗的比较研究

M. Dawood, Zaidon Sufyan Mohammed
{"title":"鼻内窥镜手术后高渗盐水与等渗盐水鼻腔冲洗的比较研究","authors":"M. Dawood, Zaidon Sufyan Mohammed","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.7904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Various nasal saline solutions have been widely used following endoscopic sinus surgery. Irrigation solutions minimize synechia formation, improve mucosal healing and enhance the removal of infective debris and crusts. Aim: This study aims to compare the efficacy of hypertonic and isotonic saline solutions in nasal irrigation following, endoscopic sinus surgery. Material and methods: Forty patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery were randomly and evenly sorted into: group “A”, which received hypertonic saline nasal irrigation, and group “B”, which received isotonic nasal irrigation The outcomes were assessed for mucociliary clearance (MCT), Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score for crusts and mucosal edema, while nasal obstruction, nasal discharge and facial pain were analyzed by SNOT22, whereby their severity was assessed by means of visual analog score. The patients were followed up for 3 weeks. Results: There was a significant difference in improvement in both groups. Group “A” MCT value on day 7 was P = 0.023, day 14 P = 0.002, and day 21 P = 0.009: for mucosal edema P = 0.009, P = 0.001, P = 0.025; and, for crusts P = 0.015, P = 0.010, P = 0.011: and, for nasal obstruction P = 0.006, P = 0.0001, P = 0.0001 respectively; and for nasal discharge and facial pain P = 0.010, P = 0.047, and P = 0.0062, P = 0.028 for days 14, and 21, respectively. Conclusion: Better results in MCT, nasal mucosal edema, crusts, nasal obstruction, discharge, and facial pain/pressure were achieved with the usage of hypertonic saline nasal irrigation.\n\n","PeriodicalId":52362,"journal":{"name":"Polish Otorhinolaryngology Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study between the uses of hypertonic saline versus isotonic saline nasal Irrigation following endoscopic sinus surgery\",\"authors\":\"M. Dawood, Zaidon Sufyan Mohammed\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0015.7904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Various nasal saline solutions have been widely used following endoscopic sinus surgery. Irrigation solutions minimize synechia formation, improve mucosal healing and enhance the removal of infective debris and crusts. Aim: This study aims to compare the efficacy of hypertonic and isotonic saline solutions in nasal irrigation following, endoscopic sinus surgery. Material and methods: Forty patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery were randomly and evenly sorted into: group “A”, which received hypertonic saline nasal irrigation, and group “B”, which received isotonic nasal irrigation The outcomes were assessed for mucociliary clearance (MCT), Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score for crusts and mucosal edema, while nasal obstruction, nasal discharge and facial pain were analyzed by SNOT22, whereby their severity was assessed by means of visual analog score. The patients were followed up for 3 weeks. Results: There was a significant difference in improvement in both groups. Group “A” MCT value on day 7 was P = 0.023, day 14 P = 0.002, and day 21 P = 0.009: for mucosal edema P = 0.009, P = 0.001, P = 0.025; and, for crusts P = 0.015, P = 0.010, P = 0.011: and, for nasal obstruction P = 0.006, P = 0.0001, P = 0.0001 respectively; and for nasal discharge and facial pain P = 0.010, P = 0.047, and P = 0.0062, P = 0.028 for days 14, and 21, respectively. Conclusion: Better results in MCT, nasal mucosal edema, crusts, nasal obstruction, discharge, and facial pain/pressure were achieved with the usage of hypertonic saline nasal irrigation.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":52362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Otorhinolaryngology Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Otorhinolaryngology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.7904\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Otorhinolaryngology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.7904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼻内窥镜鼻窦手术后广泛使用各种鼻盐水溶液。冲洗溶液可以减少粘连的形成,改善粘膜愈合,并增强感染性碎片和结痂的清除。目的:比较高渗盐水和等渗盐水在内镜鼻窦手术后鼻腔冲洗中的效果。材料与方法:将40例鼻窦内窥镜手术患者随机均匀分为:A组接受高渗生理盐水鼻冲洗,B组接受等渗鼻冲洗。对两组患者进行粘膜睫状体清除率(mucociliary clearance, MCT)、结痂和粘膜水肿的lundd - kennedy内镜评分,鼻塞、流鼻涕和面部疼痛采用SNOT22分析,并用视觉模拟评分评估其严重程度。随访3周。结果:两组患者改善程度差异有统计学意义。A组第7天MCT值P = 0.023,第14天P = 0.002,第21天P = 0.009:粘膜水肿P = 0.009, P = 0.001, P = 0.025;结痂P = 0.015, P = 0.010, P = 0.011;鼻塞P = 0.006, P = 0.0001, P = 0.0001;第14天、第21天鼻溢液和面部疼痛P = 0.010、P = 0.047、P = 0.0062、P = 0.028。结论:高渗盐水鼻冲洗对MCT、鼻黏膜水肿、结痂、鼻塞、鼻分泌物、面部疼痛/压力均有较好的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study between the uses of hypertonic saline versus isotonic saline nasal Irrigation following endoscopic sinus surgery
Introduction: Various nasal saline solutions have been widely used following endoscopic sinus surgery. Irrigation solutions minimize synechia formation, improve mucosal healing and enhance the removal of infective debris and crusts. Aim: This study aims to compare the efficacy of hypertonic and isotonic saline solutions in nasal irrigation following, endoscopic sinus surgery. Material and methods: Forty patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery were randomly and evenly sorted into: group “A”, which received hypertonic saline nasal irrigation, and group “B”, which received isotonic nasal irrigation The outcomes were assessed for mucociliary clearance (MCT), Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score for crusts and mucosal edema, while nasal obstruction, nasal discharge and facial pain were analyzed by SNOT22, whereby their severity was assessed by means of visual analog score. The patients were followed up for 3 weeks. Results: There was a significant difference in improvement in both groups. Group “A” MCT value on day 7 was P = 0.023, day 14 P = 0.002, and day 21 P = 0.009: for mucosal edema P = 0.009, P = 0.001, P = 0.025; and, for crusts P = 0.015, P = 0.010, P = 0.011: and, for nasal obstruction P = 0.006, P = 0.0001, P = 0.0001 respectively; and for nasal discharge and facial pain P = 0.010, P = 0.047, and P = 0.0062, P = 0.028 for days 14, and 21, respectively. Conclusion: Better results in MCT, nasal mucosal edema, crusts, nasal obstruction, discharge, and facial pain/pressure were achieved with the usage of hypertonic saline nasal irrigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Otorhinolaryngology Review
Polish Otorhinolaryngology Review Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Kontralateralna reinerwacja krtani u pacjenta z prawostronnym porażeniem fałdu głosowego – opis przypadku Endoscopic finding versus CT nose and paranasal sinuses appearance in chronic rhinosinusitis; A comparative study What are the current research results based on EBM recommendations and what they do not recommend in the treatment of chronic tinnitus? Atrophy of the long process of the incus of unknown origin – a rare cause of acquired conductive hearing loss. Clinical case report and a mini-review of literature Sigmoid sinus thrombosis in patient after Bondy surgery - a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1