{"title":"鼻内窥镜手术后高渗盐水与等渗盐水鼻腔冲洗的比较研究","authors":"M. Dawood, Zaidon Sufyan Mohammed","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.7904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Various nasal saline solutions have been widely used following endoscopic sinus surgery. Irrigation solutions minimize synechia formation, improve mucosal healing and enhance the removal of infective debris and crusts. Aim: This study aims to compare the efficacy of hypertonic and isotonic saline solutions in nasal irrigation following, endoscopic sinus surgery. Material and methods: Forty patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery were randomly and evenly sorted into: group “A”, which received hypertonic saline nasal irrigation, and group “B”, which received isotonic nasal irrigation The outcomes were assessed for mucociliary clearance (MCT), Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score for crusts and mucosal edema, while nasal obstruction, nasal discharge and facial pain were analyzed by SNOT22, whereby their severity was assessed by means of visual analog score. The patients were followed up for 3 weeks. Results: There was a significant difference in improvement in both groups. Group “A” MCT value on day 7 was P = 0.023, day 14 P = 0.002, and day 21 P = 0.009: for mucosal edema P = 0.009, P = 0.001, P = 0.025; and, for crusts P = 0.015, P = 0.010, P = 0.011: and, for nasal obstruction P = 0.006, P = 0.0001, P = 0.0001 respectively; and for nasal discharge and facial pain P = 0.010, P = 0.047, and P = 0.0062, P = 0.028 for days 14, and 21, respectively. Conclusion: Better results in MCT, nasal mucosal edema, crusts, nasal obstruction, discharge, and facial pain/pressure were achieved with the usage of hypertonic saline nasal irrigation.\n\n","PeriodicalId":52362,"journal":{"name":"Polish Otorhinolaryngology Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study between the uses of hypertonic saline versus isotonic saline nasal Irrigation following endoscopic sinus surgery\",\"authors\":\"M. Dawood, Zaidon Sufyan Mohammed\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0015.7904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Various nasal saline solutions have been widely used following endoscopic sinus surgery. Irrigation solutions minimize synechia formation, improve mucosal healing and enhance the removal of infective debris and crusts. Aim: This study aims to compare the efficacy of hypertonic and isotonic saline solutions in nasal irrigation following, endoscopic sinus surgery. Material and methods: Forty patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery were randomly and evenly sorted into: group “A”, which received hypertonic saline nasal irrigation, and group “B”, which received isotonic nasal irrigation The outcomes were assessed for mucociliary clearance (MCT), Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score for crusts and mucosal edema, while nasal obstruction, nasal discharge and facial pain were analyzed by SNOT22, whereby their severity was assessed by means of visual analog score. The patients were followed up for 3 weeks. Results: There was a significant difference in improvement in both groups. Group “A” MCT value on day 7 was P = 0.023, day 14 P = 0.002, and day 21 P = 0.009: for mucosal edema P = 0.009, P = 0.001, P = 0.025; and, for crusts P = 0.015, P = 0.010, P = 0.011: and, for nasal obstruction P = 0.006, P = 0.0001, P = 0.0001 respectively; and for nasal discharge and facial pain P = 0.010, P = 0.047, and P = 0.0062, P = 0.028 for days 14, and 21, respectively. Conclusion: Better results in MCT, nasal mucosal edema, crusts, nasal obstruction, discharge, and facial pain/pressure were achieved with the usage of hypertonic saline nasal irrigation.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":52362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Otorhinolaryngology Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Otorhinolaryngology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.7904\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Otorhinolaryngology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.7904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
鼻内窥镜鼻窦手术后广泛使用各种鼻盐水溶液。冲洗溶液可以减少粘连的形成,改善粘膜愈合,并增强感染性碎片和结痂的清除。目的:比较高渗盐水和等渗盐水在内镜鼻窦手术后鼻腔冲洗中的效果。材料与方法:将40例鼻窦内窥镜手术患者随机均匀分为:A组接受高渗生理盐水鼻冲洗,B组接受等渗鼻冲洗。对两组患者进行粘膜睫状体清除率(mucociliary clearance, MCT)、结痂和粘膜水肿的lundd - kennedy内镜评分,鼻塞、流鼻涕和面部疼痛采用SNOT22分析,并用视觉模拟评分评估其严重程度。随访3周。结果:两组患者改善程度差异有统计学意义。A组第7天MCT值P = 0.023,第14天P = 0.002,第21天P = 0.009:粘膜水肿P = 0.009, P = 0.001, P = 0.025;结痂P = 0.015, P = 0.010, P = 0.011;鼻塞P = 0.006, P = 0.0001, P = 0.0001;第14天、第21天鼻溢液和面部疼痛P = 0.010、P = 0.047、P = 0.0062、P = 0.028。结论:高渗盐水鼻冲洗对MCT、鼻黏膜水肿、结痂、鼻塞、鼻分泌物、面部疼痛/压力均有较好的治疗效果。
Comparative study between the uses of hypertonic saline versus isotonic saline nasal Irrigation following endoscopic sinus surgery
Introduction: Various nasal saline solutions have been widely used following endoscopic sinus surgery. Irrigation solutions minimize synechia formation, improve mucosal healing and enhance the removal of infective debris and crusts. Aim: This study aims to compare the efficacy of hypertonic and isotonic saline solutions in nasal irrigation following, endoscopic sinus surgery. Material and methods: Forty patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery were randomly and evenly sorted into: group “A”, which received hypertonic saline nasal irrigation, and group “B”, which received isotonic nasal irrigation The outcomes were assessed for mucociliary clearance (MCT), Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score for crusts and mucosal edema, while nasal obstruction, nasal discharge and facial pain were analyzed by SNOT22, whereby their severity was assessed by means of visual analog score. The patients were followed up for 3 weeks. Results: There was a significant difference in improvement in both groups. Group “A” MCT value on day 7 was P = 0.023, day 14 P = 0.002, and day 21 P = 0.009: for mucosal edema P = 0.009, P = 0.001, P = 0.025; and, for crusts P = 0.015, P = 0.010, P = 0.011: and, for nasal obstruction P = 0.006, P = 0.0001, P = 0.0001 respectively; and for nasal discharge and facial pain P = 0.010, P = 0.047, and P = 0.0062, P = 0.028 for days 14, and 21, respectively. Conclusion: Better results in MCT, nasal mucosal edema, crusts, nasal obstruction, discharge, and facial pain/pressure were achieved with the usage of hypertonic saline nasal irrigation.