{"title":"中学义务教育历史教学的男女同校视角","authors":"Isidora Sáez-Rosenkranz, Elvira Barriga-Ubed, Ilaria Bellatti","doi":"10.6018/reifop.22.2.370201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"El presente artículo tiene como objetivo analizar la perspectiva coeducativa de tres unidades didácticas de innovación docente dirigidas a diferentes niveles de la Educación Secundaria en el ámbito de la enseñanza de las ciencias sociales (Atenas; Amores y Revolución). Para ello hemos realizado dos procedimientos de análisis, uno asociado a los materiales en sí y el otro, a su puesta en práctica. El análisis de los materiales se ha realizado mediante el análisis del contenido, mientras la aplicación ha sido realizada a partir del análisis de notas de campo extraídas a través de observación no participante. De estos análisis es posible establecer que tanto las unidades, como su aplicación, abordan la perspectiva coeducativa, aunque su explotación en la práctica educativa queda condicionada por la acción docente. En este sentido, sería necesario profundizar en la formación inicial y continua del profesorado.\n The objective of this article is to analyze the coeducational perspective of three teaching innovation proposals: Athens, the origin of democracy, The loves of my life and Women and Industrial Revolution. The three proposals are oriented to different levels of Secondary Compulsory Education in the field of social sciences teaching. To do so, we have carried out two analysis procedures, one associated with the materials themselves and the other, with their implementation. The analysis of the materials has been done through content analysis, while the application has been made from the analysis of field notes extracted through non-participant observation. From this analysis, it is possible to state that both, the units and their implementation, put into practice several dimensions of coeducational perspective, although its exploitation in educational practice is conditioned by teaching action. In this sense, it would be necessary to the didactic designs as well as in initial and continuous teacher’s training programs.","PeriodicalId":36972,"journal":{"name":"Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formacion del Profesorado","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coeducation as a perspective for History teaching in Secondary Compulsory Education\",\"authors\":\"Isidora Sáez-Rosenkranz, Elvira Barriga-Ubed, Ilaria Bellatti\",\"doi\":\"10.6018/reifop.22.2.370201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"El presente artículo tiene como objetivo analizar la perspectiva coeducativa de tres unidades didácticas de innovación docente dirigidas a diferentes niveles de la Educación Secundaria en el ámbito de la enseñanza de las ciencias sociales (Atenas; Amores y Revolución). Para ello hemos realizado dos procedimientos de análisis, uno asociado a los materiales en sí y el otro, a su puesta en práctica. El análisis de los materiales se ha realizado mediante el análisis del contenido, mientras la aplicación ha sido realizada a partir del análisis de notas de campo extraídas a través de observación no participante. De estos análisis es posible establecer que tanto las unidades, como su aplicación, abordan la perspectiva coeducativa, aunque su explotación en la práctica educativa queda condicionada por la acción docente. En este sentido, sería necesario profundizar en la formación inicial y continua del profesorado.\\n The objective of this article is to analyze the coeducational perspective of three teaching innovation proposals: Athens, the origin of democracy, The loves of my life and Women and Industrial Revolution. The three proposals are oriented to different levels of Secondary Compulsory Education in the field of social sciences teaching. To do so, we have carried out two analysis procedures, one associated with the materials themselves and the other, with their implementation. The analysis of the materials has been done through content analysis, while the application has been made from the analysis of field notes extracted through non-participant observation. From this analysis, it is possible to state that both, the units and their implementation, put into practice several dimensions of coeducational perspective, although its exploitation in educational practice is conditioned by teaching action. In this sense, it would be necessary to the didactic designs as well as in initial and continuous teacher’s training programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formacion del Profesorado\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formacion del Profesorado\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.22.2.370201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formacion del Profesorado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.22.2.370201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Coeducation as a perspective for History teaching in Secondary Compulsory Education
El presente artículo tiene como objetivo analizar la perspectiva coeducativa de tres unidades didácticas de innovación docente dirigidas a diferentes niveles de la Educación Secundaria en el ámbito de la enseñanza de las ciencias sociales (Atenas; Amores y Revolución). Para ello hemos realizado dos procedimientos de análisis, uno asociado a los materiales en sí y el otro, a su puesta en práctica. El análisis de los materiales se ha realizado mediante el análisis del contenido, mientras la aplicación ha sido realizada a partir del análisis de notas de campo extraídas a través de observación no participante. De estos análisis es posible establecer que tanto las unidades, como su aplicación, abordan la perspectiva coeducativa, aunque su explotación en la práctica educativa queda condicionada por la acción docente. En este sentido, sería necesario profundizar en la formación inicial y continua del profesorado.
The objective of this article is to analyze the coeducational perspective of three teaching innovation proposals: Athens, the origin of democracy, The loves of my life and Women and Industrial Revolution. The three proposals are oriented to different levels of Secondary Compulsory Education in the field of social sciences teaching. To do so, we have carried out two analysis procedures, one associated with the materials themselves and the other, with their implementation. The analysis of the materials has been done through content analysis, while the application has been made from the analysis of field notes extracted through non-participant observation. From this analysis, it is possible to state that both, the units and their implementation, put into practice several dimensions of coeducational perspective, although its exploitation in educational practice is conditioned by teaching action. In this sense, it would be necessary to the didactic designs as well as in initial and continuous teacher’s training programs.