{"title":"英语现在进行时的情态潜力","authors":"E. Prażmo","doi":"10.5817/BSE2018-1-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following Verhagen’s suggestion that “one cannot be an optimal semanticist without also doing syntax and discourse analysis” (Verhagen 1995: 104), we attempt to analyse the English present progressive from the semantic point of view. First, we investigate the intertwined connection between tense and aspect. Then, after Goldsmith and Woisetschlaeger (1982) we examine the structural and the phenomenological interpretations of events expressed in present tenses. We claim that present progressive is highly polysemous with a core meaning expressing the immediacy in temporal reality, a number of peripheral but stable senses and numerous “meaning potentials” (Norén and Linell 2007) which are substantiated only in specific contexts. Having established a general view of its meanings, we analyze unconventional uses of the present progressive i.e. its occurrence with verbs traditionally perceived as static. We suggest that modal meanings in such unconventional pairings of verb and aspect emerge as a result of a blending process (Fauconnier and Turner 2002, 2003).","PeriodicalId":35227,"journal":{"name":"Brno Studies in English","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The modal potential in the English present progressive\",\"authors\":\"E. Prażmo\",\"doi\":\"10.5817/BSE2018-1-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following Verhagen’s suggestion that “one cannot be an optimal semanticist without also doing syntax and discourse analysis” (Verhagen 1995: 104), we attempt to analyse the English present progressive from the semantic point of view. First, we investigate the intertwined connection between tense and aspect. Then, after Goldsmith and Woisetschlaeger (1982) we examine the structural and the phenomenological interpretations of events expressed in present tenses. We claim that present progressive is highly polysemous with a core meaning expressing the immediacy in temporal reality, a number of peripheral but stable senses and numerous “meaning potentials” (Norén and Linell 2007) which are substantiated only in specific contexts. Having established a general view of its meanings, we analyze unconventional uses of the present progressive i.e. its occurrence with verbs traditionally perceived as static. We suggest that modal meanings in such unconventional pairings of verb and aspect emerge as a result of a blending process (Fauconnier and Turner 2002, 2003).\",\"PeriodicalId\":35227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brno Studies in English\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brno Studies in English\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2018-1-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brno Studies in English","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2018-1-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
根据Verhagen提出的“不做句法和语篇分析就不可能成为最优的语义学家”(Verhagen 1995: 104),我们试图从语义的角度分析英语现在进行时。首先,我们研究了时态和时态之间相互交织的联系。然后,在Goldsmith和Woisetschlaeger(1982)之后,我们研究了用现在时态表达的事件的结构和现象学解释。我们认为,现在进行式具有高度的多义性,其核心意义表达了时间现实中的直接性,许多外围但稳定的感觉和许多“意义潜力”(norsamn and Linell 2007),这些意义潜力仅在特定的语境中得到证实。在对现在进行时的意义有了大致的认识之后,我们分析了现在进行时的非常规用法,即它与传统上被认为是静态的动词一起出现。我们认为,在这种非常规的动词和体对中,情态意义是混合过程的结果(Fauconnier和Turner 2002,2003)。
The modal potential in the English present progressive
Following Verhagen’s suggestion that “one cannot be an optimal semanticist without also doing syntax and discourse analysis” (Verhagen 1995: 104), we attempt to analyse the English present progressive from the semantic point of view. First, we investigate the intertwined connection between tense and aspect. Then, after Goldsmith and Woisetschlaeger (1982) we examine the structural and the phenomenological interpretations of events expressed in present tenses. We claim that present progressive is highly polysemous with a core meaning expressing the immediacy in temporal reality, a number of peripheral but stable senses and numerous “meaning potentials” (Norén and Linell 2007) which are substantiated only in specific contexts. Having established a general view of its meanings, we analyze unconventional uses of the present progressive i.e. its occurrence with verbs traditionally perceived as static. We suggest that modal meanings in such unconventional pairings of verb and aspect emerge as a result of a blending process (Fauconnier and Turner 2002, 2003).