为空间辩护:学习空间对教与学的影响

Q4 Social Sciences Curriculum and Teaching Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.7459/CT/29.1.02
T. Byers, W. Imms, Elizabeth Hartnell-Young
{"title":"为空间辩护:学习空间对教与学的影响","authors":"T. Byers, W. Imms, Elizabeth Hartnell-Young","doi":"10.7459/CT/29.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An explanatory, mixed method study examined the impact of learning spaces on teachers’ pedagogy, student engagement and student learning outcomes in a technology-rich school setting. Its quasi-experimental design allowed examination of differences in these variables between two settings – ‘traditional’ classrooms, and ‘new generation learning spaces’ (NGLS). Results from quantitative analyses over a one-year period indicated that particular configurations of learning spaces did have a meas-urable effect on how students’ perceived their learning experiences and their engagement levels, with improvements often linked to NGLS. In addition, comparative analyses of experimental and control group standardised assessment data in subjects English and mathematics indicated a similar effect for the same participants. The study suggests that a sin-gle-subject, repeated measures design (SSRD) can be used to measure the outcomes effect of space on student learning outcomes. In this regard, this approach addresses a perceived lack of empirical data highlighted by recent reviews of research on this topic.","PeriodicalId":35186,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum and Teaching","volume":"29 1","pages":"5-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7459/CT/29.1.02","citationCount":"83","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making the Case for Space: The Effect of Learning Spaces on Teaching and Learning\",\"authors\":\"T. Byers, W. Imms, Elizabeth Hartnell-Young\",\"doi\":\"10.7459/CT/29.1.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An explanatory, mixed method study examined the impact of learning spaces on teachers’ pedagogy, student engagement and student learning outcomes in a technology-rich school setting. Its quasi-experimental design allowed examination of differences in these variables between two settings – ‘traditional’ classrooms, and ‘new generation learning spaces’ (NGLS). Results from quantitative analyses over a one-year period indicated that particular configurations of learning spaces did have a meas-urable effect on how students’ perceived their learning experiences and their engagement levels, with improvements often linked to NGLS. In addition, comparative analyses of experimental and control group standardised assessment data in subjects English and mathematics indicated a similar effect for the same participants. The study suggests that a sin-gle-subject, repeated measures design (SSRD) can be used to measure the outcomes effect of space on student learning outcomes. In this regard, this approach addresses a perceived lack of empirical data highlighted by recent reviews of research on this topic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum and Teaching\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"5-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7459/CT/29.1.02\",\"citationCount\":\"83\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum and Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7459/CT/29.1.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/CT/29.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 83

摘要

一项解释性混合方法研究考察了在技术丰富的学校环境中,学习空间对教师教学法、学生参与度和学生学习成果的影响。它的准实验设计允许检查两种设置-“传统”教室和“新一代学习空间”(NGLS)之间这些变量的差异。为期一年的定量分析结果表明,学习空间的特定配置确实对学生如何感知他们的学习经历和参与度产生了可测量的影响,这种改善通常与ngl有关。此外,对实验组和对照组在英语和数学科目上的标准化评估数据的比较分析表明,同样的参与者也有类似的效果。本研究建议采用单受试者重复测量设计(SSRD)来测量空间对学生学习成果的影响。在这方面,这种方法解决了最近关于这一主题的研究综述所强调的缺乏经验数据的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making the Case for Space: The Effect of Learning Spaces on Teaching and Learning
An explanatory, mixed method study examined the impact of learning spaces on teachers’ pedagogy, student engagement and student learning outcomes in a technology-rich school setting. Its quasi-experimental design allowed examination of differences in these variables between two settings – ‘traditional’ classrooms, and ‘new generation learning spaces’ (NGLS). Results from quantitative analyses over a one-year period indicated that particular configurations of learning spaces did have a meas-urable effect on how students’ perceived their learning experiences and their engagement levels, with improvements often linked to NGLS. In addition, comparative analyses of experimental and control group standardised assessment data in subjects English and mathematics indicated a similar effect for the same participants. The study suggests that a sin-gle-subject, repeated measures design (SSRD) can be used to measure the outcomes effect of space on student learning outcomes. In this regard, this approach addresses a perceived lack of empirical data highlighted by recent reviews of research on this topic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum and Teaching
Curriculum and Teaching Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Curriculum and Teaching, first published in 1985, is an established, refereed international journal publishing original research from throughout the world which deals with major up-to-date issues and trends in curriculum theory and practice. The journal uses a balanced and comparative perspective to consider curriculum design and development, evaluation, curriculum models, comparative studies in curriculum, innovation and policy, planning, and educational administration. The journal’s object is to advance the study and development of curriculum and teaching, with a view to improving teaching and pedagogy. Curriculum and Teaching provides an impartial forum for scholars throughout the world, working in the area of curriculum studies. Curriculum and Teaching is double blind peer reviewed. The journal has no publication fees.
期刊最新文献
Combined Teaching Strategies as an Attitude Changing Tool Towards Inclusive Education Quality Education in Schools Outcomes-Based Teaching and Learning Assessment Instrument for Teachers in Higher Education Curriculum Management in Higher Education: An Analysis Using the Four Frames Model Student Performance in Different Modes of Online and In-person Assessments and Impact on Academic Integrity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1