在第一章第二章的拉丁语小说里间接的证据

Q3 Arts and Humanities Graeco-Latina Brunensia Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5817/glb2019-2-3
Bohdan Chernyukh
{"title":"在第一章第二章的拉丁语小说里间接的证据","authors":"Bohdan Chernyukh","doi":"10.5817/glb2019-2-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the means of expressing indirect (inferentive and reportative) evidentiality in Latin narrative prose of I–II A. D. on the material Petron’s Satyricon and Apuleius’ Metamorphoses. Morphological forms and syntactic constructions treated as evidential strategies are taken into account, since their main meanings are within the pattern of the grammatical categories (tense, mood etc.), and the information about the source and/or means of access to information is contextually motivated side effect. The result of the research reveals singling out eight strategies to express indirect evidentiality. Inferentive evidentiality is represented by five evidential strategies, while the reportative – by the three. Different use of evidential strategies in both works relates to context and personal choice of the authors.","PeriodicalId":38376,"journal":{"name":"Graeco-Latina Brunensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indirekte Evidentialität in der lateinischen erzählenden Prosa des I-II Jhdt.\",\"authors\":\"Bohdan Chernyukh\",\"doi\":\"10.5817/glb2019-2-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper examines the means of expressing indirect (inferentive and reportative) evidentiality in Latin narrative prose of I–II A. D. on the material Petron’s Satyricon and Apuleius’ Metamorphoses. Morphological forms and syntactic constructions treated as evidential strategies are taken into account, since their main meanings are within the pattern of the grammatical categories (tense, mood etc.), and the information about the source and/or means of access to information is contextually motivated side effect. The result of the research reveals singling out eight strategies to express indirect evidentiality. Inferentive evidentiality is represented by five evidential strategies, while the reportative – by the three. Different use of evidential strategies in both works relates to context and personal choice of the authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Graeco-Latina Brunensia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Graeco-Latina Brunensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5817/glb2019-2-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graeco-Latina Brunensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/glb2019-2-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以彼得隆的《萨特利康》和阿普列乌斯的《变形记》为材料,考察了公元1 - 2世纪拉丁文叙事散文中间接(推理和报告)证据的表达方式。作为证据策略的形态形式和句法结构被考虑在内,因为它们的主要意义在语法类别(时态、语气等)的模式内,而关于信息来源和/或获取信息的方式的信息是上下文驱动的副作用。研究结果揭示了八种表达间接证据的策略。推论证据策略由五种证据策略代表,而报告证据策略由三种证据策略代表。两部作品中证据策略的不同使用与语境和作者的个人选择有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Indirekte Evidentialität in der lateinischen erzählenden Prosa des I-II Jhdt.
The paper examines the means of expressing indirect (inferentive and reportative) evidentiality in Latin narrative prose of I–II A. D. on the material Petron’s Satyricon and Apuleius’ Metamorphoses. Morphological forms and syntactic constructions treated as evidential strategies are taken into account, since their main meanings are within the pattern of the grammatical categories (tense, mood etc.), and the information about the source and/or means of access to information is contextually motivated side effect. The result of the research reveals singling out eight strategies to express indirect evidentiality. Inferentive evidentiality is represented by five evidential strategies, while the reportative – by the three. Different use of evidential strategies in both works relates to context and personal choice of the authors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Graeco-Latina Brunensia
Graeco-Latina Brunensia Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Presencia, función y orden de constituyentes de algunas construcciones monovalentes en la Peregrinatio Egeriae "Polluit sanguis iste, non redemit" – Beobachtungen zum Motiv des Blutes in Firmicus Maternus, De errore profanarum religionum Vt cecinit poeta: the presence of Virgil in Rodrigo de Castro's De uniuersa mulierum medicina Griechisch ἦμαρ, ἡμέρα 'Tag' und der Spiritus asper The ambiguity of Plato's Menexenus: a school manifesto
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1