{"title":"视频尿动力学案例研究:一个独特的经验教训","authors":"Lynn Ng Yun Shu, Wang Fenfen, Ng Lay Guat","doi":"10.7257/1053-816X.2018.38.1.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"&NA; The following case discusses a 62‐year‐old female patient who presented to a local emergency department with severe abdominal pain and acute urinary retention secondary to bladder stones. She was diagnosed with a cystocele and uterine prolapse. Video urodynamic studies (VUDS) were undertaken for further evaluation, but due to the altered anatomical landmarks, the left ureter was inadvertently initially cannulated, then corrected.","PeriodicalId":85039,"journal":{"name":"Journal of urological nursing","volume":"38 1","pages":"36–41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case Study in Video Urodynamics: A Unique Lesson Learned\",\"authors\":\"Lynn Ng Yun Shu, Wang Fenfen, Ng Lay Guat\",\"doi\":\"10.7257/1053-816X.2018.38.1.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"&NA; The following case discusses a 62‐year‐old female patient who presented to a local emergency department with severe abdominal pain and acute urinary retention secondary to bladder stones. She was diagnosed with a cystocele and uterine prolapse. Video urodynamic studies (VUDS) were undertaken for further evaluation, but due to the altered anatomical landmarks, the left ureter was inadvertently initially cannulated, then corrected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of urological nursing\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"36–41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of urological nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7257/1053-816X.2018.38.1.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of urological nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7257/1053-816X.2018.38.1.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Case Study in Video Urodynamics: A Unique Lesson Learned
&NA; The following case discusses a 62‐year‐old female patient who presented to a local emergency department with severe abdominal pain and acute urinary retention secondary to bladder stones. She was diagnosed with a cystocele and uterine prolapse. Video urodynamic studies (VUDS) were undertaken for further evaluation, but due to the altered anatomical landmarks, the left ureter was inadvertently initially cannulated, then corrected.