透明度的重要性:宣布在学术写作中使用生成人工智能。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Scholarship Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1111/jnu.12938
Arthur Tang PhD, Kin-Kit Li PhD, Kin On Kwok PhD, Liujiao Cao MD, Stanley Luong PhD, Wilson Tam PhD
{"title":"透明度的重要性:宣布在学术写作中使用生成人工智能。","authors":"Arthur Tang PhD,&nbsp;Kin-Kit Li PhD,&nbsp;Kin On Kwok PhD,&nbsp;Liujiao Cao MD,&nbsp;Stanley Luong PhD,&nbsp;Wilson Tam PhD","doi":"10.1111/jnu.12938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into academic research writing has revolutionized the field, offering powerful tools like ChatGPT and Bard to aid researchers in content generation and idea enhancement. We explore the current state of transparency regarding generative AI use in nursing academic research journals, emphasizing the need for explicitly declaring the use of generative AI by authors in the manuscript. Out of 125 nursing studies journals, 37.6% required explicit statements about generative AI use in their authors' guidelines. No significant differences in impact factors or journal categories were found between journals with and without such requirement. A similar evaluation of medicine, general and internal journals showed a lower percentage (14.5%) including the information about generative AI usage. Declaring generative AI tool usage is crucial for maintaining the transparency and credibility in academic writing. Additionally, extending the requirement for AI usage declarations to journal reviewers can enhance the quality of peer review and combat predatory journals in the academic publishing landscape. Our study highlights the need for active participation from nursing researchers in discussions surrounding standardization of generative AI declaration in academic research writing.</p>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":"56 2","pages":"314-318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jnu.12938","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing\",\"authors\":\"Arthur Tang PhD,&nbsp;Kin-Kit Li PhD,&nbsp;Kin On Kwok PhD,&nbsp;Liujiao Cao MD,&nbsp;Stanley Luong PhD,&nbsp;Wilson Tam PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jnu.12938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into academic research writing has revolutionized the field, offering powerful tools like ChatGPT and Bard to aid researchers in content generation and idea enhancement. We explore the current state of transparency regarding generative AI use in nursing academic research journals, emphasizing the need for explicitly declaring the use of generative AI by authors in the manuscript. Out of 125 nursing studies journals, 37.6% required explicit statements about generative AI use in their authors' guidelines. No significant differences in impact factors or journal categories were found between journals with and without such requirement. A similar evaluation of medicine, general and internal journals showed a lower percentage (14.5%) including the information about generative AI usage. Declaring generative AI tool usage is crucial for maintaining the transparency and credibility in academic writing. Additionally, extending the requirement for AI usage declarations to journal reviewers can enhance the quality of peer review and combat predatory journals in the academic publishing landscape. Our study highlights the need for active participation from nursing researchers in discussions surrounding standardization of generative AI declaration in academic research writing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Scholarship\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"314-318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jnu.12938\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Scholarship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.12938\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.12938","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生成人工智能(AI)与学术研究写作的结合彻底改变了该领域,提供了ChatGPT和Bard等强大的工具来帮助研究人员生成内容和增强想法。我们探讨了护理学术研究期刊中生成性人工智能使用的透明度现状,强调有必要在手稿中明确声明作者使用生成人工智能。在125份护理研究期刊中,37.6%的期刊要求在作者指南中明确说明生成性人工智能的使用。有和没有这一要求的期刊在影响因素或期刊类别方面没有发现显著差异。对医学、普通期刊和内部期刊的类似评估显示,包括生成性人工智能使用信息的比例较低(14.5%)。宣布生成性人工智能工具的使用对于保持学术写作的透明度和可信度至关重要。此外,将人工智能使用声明的要求扩展到期刊评审员,可以提高同行评审的质量,并在学术出版领域打击掠夺性期刊。我们的研究强调,护理研究人员需要积极参与围绕学术研究写作中生成性人工智能声明标准化的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into academic research writing has revolutionized the field, offering powerful tools like ChatGPT and Bard to aid researchers in content generation and idea enhancement. We explore the current state of transparency regarding generative AI use in nursing academic research journals, emphasizing the need for explicitly declaring the use of generative AI by authors in the manuscript. Out of 125 nursing studies journals, 37.6% required explicit statements about generative AI use in their authors' guidelines. No significant differences in impact factors or journal categories were found between journals with and without such requirement. A similar evaluation of medicine, general and internal journals showed a lower percentage (14.5%) including the information about generative AI usage. Declaring generative AI tool usage is crucial for maintaining the transparency and credibility in academic writing. Additionally, extending the requirement for AI usage declarations to journal reviewers can enhance the quality of peer review and combat predatory journals in the academic publishing landscape. Our study highlights the need for active participation from nursing researchers in discussions surrounding standardization of generative AI declaration in academic research writing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
期刊最新文献
Applying natural language processing to understand symptoms among older adults home healthcare patients with urinary incontinence. The efficacy of behavioral sleep intervention on sleep problems among children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A randomized controlled trial. PICOT questions and search strategies formulation: A novel approach using artificial intelligence automation. Low-value and high-value care recommendations in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1