鞘内高压罗哌卡因用于早产单胎和双胎剖宫产的剂量反应比较研究。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2023-104875
Miao Zhu, Ju-Jun Liu, Yan-Ping Shen, Zheng-Bin Pan, Chang-Cheng Lv, Wen-Din Chen, Xiaowei Qian
{"title":"鞘内高压罗哌卡因用于早产单胎和双胎剖宫产的剂量反应比较研究。","authors":"Miao Zhu, Ju-Jun Liu, Yan-Ping Shen, Zheng-Bin Pan, Chang-Cheng Lv, Wen-Din Chen, Xiaowei Qian","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-104875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previously, we demonstrated that patients with full-term singletons and preterm twins require similar dose of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine. However, these findings may be attributable to enrolled patients with preterm twin pregnancies. In this study, we aimed to determine the intrathecal dose requirements of hyperbaric ropivacaine for twins and singletons at equal gestational ages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 75 patients with preterm singletons and 75 patients with preterm twins scheduled for cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in this two-arm parallel, randomized, double-blind, dose-response study. Patients with singletons and twins were randomly assigned to receive one of five different doses of hyperbaric ropivacaine: 10, 12, 14, 16, or 18 mg. A probit regression model was used to determine the dose effective in 50% of patients (ED<sub>50</sub>) and dose effective in 90% of patients (ED<sub>90</sub>) values. The relative median potency was calculated to compare the ED<sub>50</sub> between patients with twins and singletons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intrathecal ropivacaine ED<sub>50</sub> and ED<sub>90</sub> (with 95% CI) in patients with preterm singletons were 9.9 (7.2 to 11.5) mg and 16.8 (14.5 to 22.9) mg, respectively. In patients with preterm twins, these values were 9.2 (95% CI 6.4 to 10.8) mg and 15.6 (95% CI 13.6 to 20.6) mg. Between patients with preterm twins and preterm singletons, the relative potency (ED<sub>50</sub> ratios) was 0.933 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During preterm gestation, intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine dose requirements for scheduled cesarean delivery were not different between patients with twins and singletons.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ChiCTR2100051382.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"764-769"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative dose-response study of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine for cesarean delivery in preterm singleton versus twin pregnancies.\",\"authors\":\"Miao Zhu, Ju-Jun Liu, Yan-Ping Shen, Zheng-Bin Pan, Chang-Cheng Lv, Wen-Din Chen, Xiaowei Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2023-104875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previously, we demonstrated that patients with full-term singletons and preterm twins require similar dose of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine. However, these findings may be attributable to enrolled patients with preterm twin pregnancies. In this study, we aimed to determine the intrathecal dose requirements of hyperbaric ropivacaine for twins and singletons at equal gestational ages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 75 patients with preterm singletons and 75 patients with preterm twins scheduled for cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in this two-arm parallel, randomized, double-blind, dose-response study. Patients with singletons and twins were randomly assigned to receive one of five different doses of hyperbaric ropivacaine: 10, 12, 14, 16, or 18 mg. A probit regression model was used to determine the dose effective in 50% of patients (ED<sub>50</sub>) and dose effective in 90% of patients (ED<sub>90</sub>) values. The relative median potency was calculated to compare the ED<sub>50</sub> between patients with twins and singletons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intrathecal ropivacaine ED<sub>50</sub> and ED<sub>90</sub> (with 95% CI) in patients with preterm singletons were 9.9 (7.2 to 11.5) mg and 16.8 (14.5 to 22.9) mg, respectively. In patients with preterm twins, these values were 9.2 (95% CI 6.4 to 10.8) mg and 15.6 (95% CI 13.6 to 20.6) mg. Between patients with preterm twins and preterm singletons, the relative potency (ED<sub>50</sub> ratios) was 0.933 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During preterm gestation, intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine dose requirements for scheduled cesarean delivery were not different between patients with twins and singletons.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ChiCTR2100051382.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"764-769\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104875\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104875","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:以前,我们证明足月单胎和早产双胎患者需要鞘内注射相似剂量的高压罗哌卡因。然而,这些发现可能归因于登记的双胎早产患者。在这项研究中,我们的目的是确定高压罗哌卡因对同胎龄双胞胎和单胎的鞘内剂量要求。方法:我们纳入了75名早产单胎患者和75名早产双胎患者,他们计划在腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉下进行剖宫产,这是一项双臂平行、随机、双盲、剂量反应研究。单胎和双胎患者被随机分配接受五种不同剂量的高压罗哌卡因之一:10、12、14、16或18 使用probit回归模型来确定50%患者的有效剂量(ED50)和90%患者的有效量(ED90)值。计算相对中位效力以比较双胎和单胎患者之间的ED50。结果:早产单胎患者鞘内罗哌卡因ED50和ED90(95%CI)分别为9.9(7.2至11.5) mg和16.8(14.5至22.9) mg。在早产双胞胎患者中,这些值为9.2(95%CI 6.4-10.8) mg和15.6(95%置信区间13.6至20.6) mg。在早产双胞胎和早产单胎患者之间,相对效力(ED50比率)为0.933(95%CI 0.72至1.15)。结论:在早产期间,双胞胎和单胎患者对计划剖宫产的鞘内高压罗哌卡因剂量要求没有差异。试验注册号:ChiCTR2100051382。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative dose-response study of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine for cesarean delivery in preterm singleton versus twin pregnancies.

Introduction: Previously, we demonstrated that patients with full-term singletons and preterm twins require similar dose of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine. However, these findings may be attributable to enrolled patients with preterm twin pregnancies. In this study, we aimed to determine the intrathecal dose requirements of hyperbaric ropivacaine for twins and singletons at equal gestational ages.

Methods: We enrolled 75 patients with preterm singletons and 75 patients with preterm twins scheduled for cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in this two-arm parallel, randomized, double-blind, dose-response study. Patients with singletons and twins were randomly assigned to receive one of five different doses of hyperbaric ropivacaine: 10, 12, 14, 16, or 18 mg. A probit regression model was used to determine the dose effective in 50% of patients (ED50) and dose effective in 90% of patients (ED90) values. The relative median potency was calculated to compare the ED50 between patients with twins and singletons.

Results: Intrathecal ropivacaine ED50 and ED90 (with 95% CI) in patients with preterm singletons were 9.9 (7.2 to 11.5) mg and 16.8 (14.5 to 22.9) mg, respectively. In patients with preterm twins, these values were 9.2 (95% CI 6.4 to 10.8) mg and 15.6 (95% CI 13.6 to 20.6) mg. Between patients with preterm twins and preterm singletons, the relative potency (ED50 ratios) was 0.933 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.15).

Conclusions: During preterm gestation, intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine dose requirements for scheduled cesarean delivery were not different between patients with twins and singletons.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR2100051382.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Axonal sensitivity and block dynamics. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections versus platelet-rich plasma as a treatment for cervical facetogenic pain: a randomized clinical trial. Structural changes in the nociceptive system induced by long-term conventional spinal cord stimulation in experimental painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Transversus abdominis plane block in minimally invasive colon surgery: a multicenter three-arm randomized controlled superiority and non-inferiority clinical trial. KDM4A facilitates neuropathic pain and microglial M1 polarization by regulating BDNF in a rat model of brachial plexus avulsion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1