{"title":"测试方法和应变计算对砾石压痕土工膜应变的影响","authors":"S.A. Bennett, R.W.I. Brachman","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The effects of test method and strain calculation method on strains from nominal 25 mm coarse gravel indentations are examined for a 1.5 mm thick HDPE geomembrane with full-scale </span>physical modeling<span><span>. Maximum principal strains were calculated using thin plate theory<span> that considers lateral displacement<span> effects and bending strain. Strains from index tests with no subgrade were found to be twice as large as those from performance tests with clay, while strains from index tests with rubber as the subgrade were only 40% of those with clay; neither index test is suitable for selecting protection layers to limit geomembrane strain. Strains from past index tests with idealized single-point loading need to be multiplied by a factor of at least 1.8 to reproduce the maximum strain from performance tests with coarse gravel. Limiting the average membrane strain to 0.25% was found to limit the maximum principal strain to less than 6%, but not to 3% as originally intended by the German standard. The maximum result of membrane plus bending strain of 3% was shown to be closer to a maximum principal strain of 4–6% because of large-displacement and three-dimensional effects. The </span></span></span>geotextile protection layers tested (nonwoven, needle-punched, 1500 and 1800 g/m</span></span><sup>2</sup>) were only able to limit the strain to 6% at a vertical pressure of 250 kPa and were unable to limit strain below 3%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"52 1","pages":"Pages 145-155"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test method and strain calculation effects on geomembrane strain from gravel indentations\",\"authors\":\"S.A. Bennett, R.W.I. Brachman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>The effects of test method and strain calculation method on strains from nominal 25 mm coarse gravel indentations are examined for a 1.5 mm thick HDPE geomembrane with full-scale </span>physical modeling<span><span>. Maximum principal strains were calculated using thin plate theory<span> that considers lateral displacement<span> effects and bending strain. Strains from index tests with no subgrade were found to be twice as large as those from performance tests with clay, while strains from index tests with rubber as the subgrade were only 40% of those with clay; neither index test is suitable for selecting protection layers to limit geomembrane strain. Strains from past index tests with idealized single-point loading need to be multiplied by a factor of at least 1.8 to reproduce the maximum strain from performance tests with coarse gravel. Limiting the average membrane strain to 0.25% was found to limit the maximum principal strain to less than 6%, but not to 3% as originally intended by the German standard. The maximum result of membrane plus bending strain of 3% was shown to be closer to a maximum principal strain of 4–6% because of large-displacement and three-dimensional effects. The </span></span></span>geotextile protection layers tested (nonwoven, needle-punched, 1500 and 1800 g/m</span></span><sup>2</sup>) were only able to limit the strain to 6% at a vertical pressure of 250 kPa and were unable to limit strain below 3%.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 145-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114423000857\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114423000857","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Test method and strain calculation effects on geomembrane strain from gravel indentations
The effects of test method and strain calculation method on strains from nominal 25 mm coarse gravel indentations are examined for a 1.5 mm thick HDPE geomembrane with full-scale physical modeling. Maximum principal strains were calculated using thin plate theory that considers lateral displacement effects and bending strain. Strains from index tests with no subgrade were found to be twice as large as those from performance tests with clay, while strains from index tests with rubber as the subgrade were only 40% of those with clay; neither index test is suitable for selecting protection layers to limit geomembrane strain. Strains from past index tests with idealized single-point loading need to be multiplied by a factor of at least 1.8 to reproduce the maximum strain from performance tests with coarse gravel. Limiting the average membrane strain to 0.25% was found to limit the maximum principal strain to less than 6%, but not to 3% as originally intended by the German standard. The maximum result of membrane plus bending strain of 3% was shown to be closer to a maximum principal strain of 4–6% because of large-displacement and three-dimensional effects. The geotextile protection layers tested (nonwoven, needle-punched, 1500 and 1800 g/m2) were only able to limit the strain to 6% at a vertical pressure of 250 kPa and were unable to limit strain below 3%.
期刊介绍:
The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident.
Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.