测试方法和应变计算对砾石压痕土工膜应变的影响

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geotextiles and Geomembranes Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.09.009
S.A. Bennett, R.W.I. Brachman
{"title":"测试方法和应变计算对砾石压痕土工膜应变的影响","authors":"S.A. Bennett,&nbsp;R.W.I. Brachman","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The effects of test method and strain calculation method on strains from nominal 25 mm coarse gravel indentations are examined for a 1.5 mm thick HDPE geomembrane with full-scale </span>physical modeling<span><span>. Maximum principal strains were calculated using thin plate theory<span> that considers lateral displacement<span> effects and bending strain. Strains from index tests with no subgrade were found to be twice as large as those from performance tests with clay, while strains from index tests with rubber as the subgrade were only 40% of those with clay; neither index test is suitable for selecting protection layers to limit geomembrane strain. Strains from past index tests with idealized single-point loading need to be multiplied by a factor of at least 1.8 to reproduce the maximum strain from performance tests with coarse gravel. Limiting the average membrane strain to 0.25% was found to limit the maximum principal strain to less than 6%, but not to 3% as originally intended by the German standard. The maximum result of membrane plus bending strain of 3% was shown to be closer to a maximum principal strain of 4–6% because of large-displacement and three-dimensional effects. The </span></span></span>geotextile protection layers tested (nonwoven, needle-punched, 1500 and 1800 g/m</span></span><sup>2</sup>) were only able to limit the strain to 6% at a vertical pressure of 250 kPa and were unable to limit strain below 3%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"52 1","pages":"Pages 145-155"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test method and strain calculation effects on geomembrane strain from gravel indentations\",\"authors\":\"S.A. Bennett,&nbsp;R.W.I. Brachman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>The effects of test method and strain calculation method on strains from nominal 25 mm coarse gravel indentations are examined for a 1.5 mm thick HDPE geomembrane with full-scale </span>physical modeling<span><span>. Maximum principal strains were calculated using thin plate theory<span> that considers lateral displacement<span> effects and bending strain. Strains from index tests with no subgrade were found to be twice as large as those from performance tests with clay, while strains from index tests with rubber as the subgrade were only 40% of those with clay; neither index test is suitable for selecting protection layers to limit geomembrane strain. Strains from past index tests with idealized single-point loading need to be multiplied by a factor of at least 1.8 to reproduce the maximum strain from performance tests with coarse gravel. Limiting the average membrane strain to 0.25% was found to limit the maximum principal strain to less than 6%, but not to 3% as originally intended by the German standard. The maximum result of membrane plus bending strain of 3% was shown to be closer to a maximum principal strain of 4–6% because of large-displacement and three-dimensional effects. The </span></span></span>geotextile protection layers tested (nonwoven, needle-punched, 1500 and 1800 g/m</span></span><sup>2</sup>) were only able to limit the strain to 6% at a vertical pressure of 250 kPa and were unable to limit strain below 3%.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 145-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114423000857\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114423000857","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对1.5 mm厚HDPE土工膜进行了全尺寸物理建模,研究了试验方法和应变计算方法对公称25 mm粗砾石压痕应变的影响。采用考虑横向位移效应和弯曲应变的薄板理论计算最大主应变。不加路基的指标试验应变是加粘土性能试验应变的2倍,而加橡胶路基的指标试验应变仅为加粘土性能试验应变的40%;两种指标试验都不适合选择保护层来限制土工膜应变。从过去的指标试验中得到的应变,在理想的单点加载条件下,需要乘以至少1.8的系数,以再现粗砾石性能试验的最大应变。研究发现,将平均膜应变限制在0.25%可以将最大主应变限制在6%以下,而不是德国标准最初预期的3%。由于大位移和三维效应,膜加弯曲应变为3%的最大结果更接近于最大主应变的4-6%。测试的土工布保护层(非织造、针刺、1500和1800 g/m2)在250 kPa的垂直压力下只能将应变限制在6%,无法将应变限制在3%以下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Test method and strain calculation effects on geomembrane strain from gravel indentations

The effects of test method and strain calculation method on strains from nominal 25 mm coarse gravel indentations are examined for a 1.5 mm thick HDPE geomembrane with full-scale physical modeling. Maximum principal strains were calculated using thin plate theory that considers lateral displacement effects and bending strain. Strains from index tests with no subgrade were found to be twice as large as those from performance tests with clay, while strains from index tests with rubber as the subgrade were only 40% of those with clay; neither index test is suitable for selecting protection layers to limit geomembrane strain. Strains from past index tests with idealized single-point loading need to be multiplied by a factor of at least 1.8 to reproduce the maximum strain from performance tests with coarse gravel. Limiting the average membrane strain to 0.25% was found to limit the maximum principal strain to less than 6%, but not to 3% as originally intended by the German standard. The maximum result of membrane plus bending strain of 3% was shown to be closer to a maximum principal strain of 4–6% because of large-displacement and three-dimensional effects. The geotextile protection layers tested (nonwoven, needle-punched, 1500 and 1800 g/m2) were only able to limit the strain to 6% at a vertical pressure of 250 kPa and were unable to limit strain below 3%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Geotextiles and Geomembranes 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
21.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident. Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Experimental study on vacuum preloading combined with intermittent airbag pressurization for treating dredged sludge Corrigendum to “Seismic response and mitigation measures for T shape retaining wall in liquefiable site” [Geotext. Geomembranes. 53(1), (2025) 331–349] Seismic response and mitigation measures for T shape retaining wall in liquefiable site Stress-strain responses of EPS geofoam upon cyclic simple shearing: Experimental investigations and constitutive modeling A large-size model test study on the consolidation effect of construction waste slurry under self-weight and bottom vacuum preloading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1