新冠肺炎措施对美国哮喘患者病情恶化率和医疗就诊的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Allergy and asthma proceedings Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.2500/aap.2023.44.230061
Helene Karcher, Matthias Schoenberger, Tejaswini Rayban, Caoimhe Kelly, Andrew Heaney, Alexander Mackay
{"title":"新冠肺炎措施对美国哮喘患者病情恶化率和医疗就诊的影响。","authors":"Helene Karcher, Matthias Schoenberger, Tejaswini Rayban, Caoimhe Kelly, Andrew Heaney, Alexander Mackay","doi":"10.2500/aap.2023.44.230061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare exacerbation rates and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in real-world patients in the United States who had moderate-to-severe asthma on medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β₂-agonist therapy at different stages before and after the pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> This noninterventional, retrospective study described demographics, exacerbations, HCRU, and medication use in patients from a US-wide healthcare claims database in 4 consecutive years anchored around March 15, 2020 (start date of the first emergency health measures against coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19], or the first lockdown, in the United States, termed \"restriction onset\" hereafter). Four cohorts of patients potentially eligible for moderate-to-severe asthma clinical trials at the beginning (index) of each of four 1-year periods (March 15, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, respectively) were built. Exacerbations, healthcare visits, and asthma medication use were counted in the 1-year period after the index for each cohort. <b>Results:</b> The prevalence of patients with one or more exacerbation per year decreased by 10.00% in the first year after the restriction onset compared with the year before and attenuated over time to 6.37% in the second year. The proportion of inpatient, emergency department, and physician's office visits remained stable over the time periods evaluated for all patients and those patients who experienced one or more exacerbations. Asthma treatment of patients who experienced one or more exacerbations also remained stable over the 4 years. <b>Conclusion:</b> The effect of COVID-19 public health measures on asthma exacerbation rates might have affected clinical trials being run during this period and should be considered in their analysis. Asthma clinical trials run under pandemic hygiene restrictions should consider lower exacerbation frequency in their study design, while treatment and healthcare visits seem unchanged.</p>","PeriodicalId":7646,"journal":{"name":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","volume":"44 6","pages":"422-428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629374/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of COVID-19 measures on exacerbation rates and healthcare visits in US asthma patients.\",\"authors\":\"Helene Karcher, Matthias Schoenberger, Tejaswini Rayban, Caoimhe Kelly, Andrew Heaney, Alexander Mackay\",\"doi\":\"10.2500/aap.2023.44.230061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare exacerbation rates and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in real-world patients in the United States who had moderate-to-severe asthma on medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β₂-agonist therapy at different stages before and after the pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> This noninterventional, retrospective study described demographics, exacerbations, HCRU, and medication use in patients from a US-wide healthcare claims database in 4 consecutive years anchored around March 15, 2020 (start date of the first emergency health measures against coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19], or the first lockdown, in the United States, termed \\\"restriction onset\\\" hereafter). Four cohorts of patients potentially eligible for moderate-to-severe asthma clinical trials at the beginning (index) of each of four 1-year periods (March 15, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, respectively) were built. Exacerbations, healthcare visits, and asthma medication use were counted in the 1-year period after the index for each cohort. <b>Results:</b> The prevalence of patients with one or more exacerbation per year decreased by 10.00% in the first year after the restriction onset compared with the year before and attenuated over time to 6.37% in the second year. The proportion of inpatient, emergency department, and physician's office visits remained stable over the time periods evaluated for all patients and those patients who experienced one or more exacerbations. Asthma treatment of patients who experienced one or more exacerbations also remained stable over the 4 years. <b>Conclusion:</b> The effect of COVID-19 public health measures on asthma exacerbation rates might have affected clinical trials being run during this period and should be considered in their analysis. Asthma clinical trials run under pandemic hygiene restrictions should consider lower exacerbation frequency in their study design, while treatment and healthcare visits seem unchanged.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy and asthma proceedings\",\"volume\":\"44 6\",\"pages\":\"422-428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629374/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy and asthma proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2023.44.230061\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2023.44.230061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:比较美国中重度哮喘患者使用中剂量或高剂量吸入皮质类固醇/长效β₂-新冠疫情前后不同阶段的激动剂治疗。方法:这项非干预性回顾性研究描述了3月15日左右美国范围内连续4年的医疗索赔数据库中患者的人口统计、病情恶化、HCRU和药物使用情况,2020年(2019年新冠肺炎第一次针对冠状病毒疾病的紧急卫生措施的开始日期,或美国第一次封锁,下文称为“限制性发作”)。在四个1年期(分别为2018年、2019年、2020年、2021年3月15日)的每一个期的开始(指数),建立了四个可能有资格进行中重度哮喘临床试验的患者队列。在每个队列的指数后的1年内,对病情加重、医疗就诊和哮喘药物使用进行统计。结果:与前一年相比,限制性发作后的第一年,每年有一次或多次恶化的患者的患病率下降了10.00%,并随着时间的推移在第二年下降到6.37%。在评估的所有患者和经历过一次或多次恶化的患者的时间段内,住院、急诊和医生办公室就诊的比例保持稳定。经历一次或多次哮喘发作的患者的哮喘治疗在4年内也保持稳定。结论:新冠肺炎公共卫生措施对哮喘恶化率的影响可能影响了在此期间进行的临床试验,应在分析中予以考虑。在大流行卫生限制下进行的哮喘临床试验应在研究设计中考虑降低恶化频率,而治疗和医疗访问似乎没有变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of COVID-19 measures on exacerbation rates and healthcare visits in US asthma patients.

Objective: To compare exacerbation rates and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in real-world patients in the United States who had moderate-to-severe asthma on medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β₂-agonist therapy at different stages before and after the pandemic. Methods: This noninterventional, retrospective study described demographics, exacerbations, HCRU, and medication use in patients from a US-wide healthcare claims database in 4 consecutive years anchored around March 15, 2020 (start date of the first emergency health measures against coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19], or the first lockdown, in the United States, termed "restriction onset" hereafter). Four cohorts of patients potentially eligible for moderate-to-severe asthma clinical trials at the beginning (index) of each of four 1-year periods (March 15, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, respectively) were built. Exacerbations, healthcare visits, and asthma medication use were counted in the 1-year period after the index for each cohort. Results: The prevalence of patients with one or more exacerbation per year decreased by 10.00% in the first year after the restriction onset compared with the year before and attenuated over time to 6.37% in the second year. The proportion of inpatient, emergency department, and physician's office visits remained stable over the time periods evaluated for all patients and those patients who experienced one or more exacerbations. Asthma treatment of patients who experienced one or more exacerbations also remained stable over the 4 years. Conclusion: The effect of COVID-19 public health measures on asthma exacerbation rates might have affected clinical trials being run during this period and should be considered in their analysis. Asthma clinical trials run under pandemic hygiene restrictions should consider lower exacerbation frequency in their study design, while treatment and healthcare visits seem unchanged.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy & Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists. The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma. Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Management of hereditary angioedema attacks by patients on long-term prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy only. Real-world surveillance of standardized quality (SQ) house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy tablets for 3 years in Japan. A case of a rash after tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis and meningococcal vaccination. Eating increases disease activity in pediatric patients with symptomatic dermographism. A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the bidirectional association between asthma and gastroesophageal reflux disease in children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1