标准化的订单集并不能消除产后疼痛管理中的种族或民族不平等。

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Equity Pub Date : 2023-10-12 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2022.0180
Celeste A Green, Jasmine D Johnson, Christine McKenzie, Alison M Stuebe
{"title":"标准化的订单集并不能消除产后疼痛管理中的种族或民族不平等。","authors":"Celeste A Green, Jasmine D Johnson, Christine McKenzie, Alison M Stuebe","doi":"10.1089/heq.2022.0180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the extent to which a standardized pain management order set reduced racial and ethnic inequities in post-cesarean pain evaluation and management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study to quantify racial and ethnic differences in pain evaluation and management before (July 2014-June 2016) and after implementation of a standardized post-cesarean order set (March 2017-February 2018). Electronic medical records were queried for pain scores >7/10, number of pain assessments, and opioid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and acetaminophen doses. Outcomes were grouped into 0 to <24 and 24-48 h postpartum, and stratified by race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black [NHB], non-Hispanic White [NHW], Asian, and other), as documented in the electronic health record. Analyses included logistic regression for the categorical outcome of pain score >7 (severe pain), and linear regression, with propensity score adjustment. Main effect and interaction terms were used to calculate the difference-in-difference in pain process and outcome measures between the baseline and follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After order set implementation (<i>N</i>=888), severe pain remained more common among NHB patients (% pain scores >7 NHW vs. NHB 0 to <24 h: 22% vs. 33%, <i>p</i>=0.003; 24-48 h: 26% vs. 40%, <i>p</i><0.001). Among all patients, pain management processes changed after implementation of the order set, with overall fewer assessments, less Opioids, and more nonopioid analgesics. However, racial and ethnic inequities in a number of assessments and in treatment were unchanged (all <i>p</i> for interaction >0.05), with the exception of a modest increase in NSAID doses 24-48 h postpartum for Hispanic patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A standardized pain management order set reduced overall postpartum opioid use, but did not reduce racial and ethnic disparities in pain evaluation and management. Future work should investigate racial equity-focused education and interventions designed to eliminate disparities in pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"7 1","pages":"685-691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardized Order Sets Do Not Eliminate Racial or Ethnic Inequities in Postpartum Pain Management.\",\"authors\":\"Celeste A Green, Jasmine D Johnson, Christine McKenzie, Alison M Stuebe\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/heq.2022.0180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the extent to which a standardized pain management order set reduced racial and ethnic inequities in post-cesarean pain evaluation and management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study to quantify racial and ethnic differences in pain evaluation and management before (July 2014-June 2016) and after implementation of a standardized post-cesarean order set (March 2017-February 2018). Electronic medical records were queried for pain scores >7/10, number of pain assessments, and opioid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and acetaminophen doses. Outcomes were grouped into 0 to <24 and 24-48 h postpartum, and stratified by race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black [NHB], non-Hispanic White [NHW], Asian, and other), as documented in the electronic health record. Analyses included logistic regression for the categorical outcome of pain score >7 (severe pain), and linear regression, with propensity score adjustment. Main effect and interaction terms were used to calculate the difference-in-difference in pain process and outcome measures between the baseline and follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After order set implementation (<i>N</i>=888), severe pain remained more common among NHB patients (% pain scores >7 NHW vs. NHB 0 to <24 h: 22% vs. 33%, <i>p</i>=0.003; 24-48 h: 26% vs. 40%, <i>p</i><0.001). Among all patients, pain management processes changed after implementation of the order set, with overall fewer assessments, less Opioids, and more nonopioid analgesics. However, racial and ethnic inequities in a number of assessments and in treatment were unchanged (all <i>p</i> for interaction >0.05), with the exception of a modest increase in NSAID doses 24-48 h postpartum for Hispanic patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A standardized pain management order set reduced overall postpartum opioid use, but did not reduce racial and ethnic disparities in pain evaluation and management. Future work should investigate racial equity-focused education and interventions designed to eliminate disparities in pain management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Equity\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"685-691\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615045/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Equity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2022.0180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2022.0180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:量化标准化疼痛管理顺序集在多大程度上减少了剖宫产后疼痛评估和管理中的种族和民族不平等。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以量化实施标准化剖宫产术后(2017年3月至2018年2月)前后(2014年7月至2016年6月)疼痛评估和管理方面的种族和民族差异。查询电子医疗记录中疼痛评分>7/10、疼痛评估次数、阿片类药物、非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)和对乙酰氨基酚剂量。结果分为0至7(严重疼痛)和线性回归,并进行倾向评分调整。主要效应和相互作用项用于计算基线期和随访期之间疼痛过程和结果测量的差异。结果:在实施医嘱集(N=888)后,严重疼痛在NHB患者中仍然更常见(疼痛评分百分比>7 NHW vs.NHB 0至p=0.003;24-48 h: 26%对40%,交互作用的pp>0.05),NSAID剂量适度增加除外24-48 h西班牙裔患者产后。结论:标准化的疼痛管理顺序集减少了产后阿片类药物的总体使用,但没有减少疼痛评估和管理中的种族和民族差异。未来的工作应该调查以种族公平为重点的教育和干预措施,以消除疼痛管理方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standardized Order Sets Do Not Eliminate Racial or Ethnic Inequities in Postpartum Pain Management.

Objective: To quantify the extent to which a standardized pain management order set reduced racial and ethnic inequities in post-cesarean pain evaluation and management.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to quantify racial and ethnic differences in pain evaluation and management before (July 2014-June 2016) and after implementation of a standardized post-cesarean order set (March 2017-February 2018). Electronic medical records were queried for pain scores >7/10, number of pain assessments, and opioid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and acetaminophen doses. Outcomes were grouped into 0 to <24 and 24-48 h postpartum, and stratified by race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black [NHB], non-Hispanic White [NHW], Asian, and other), as documented in the electronic health record. Analyses included logistic regression for the categorical outcome of pain score >7 (severe pain), and linear regression, with propensity score adjustment. Main effect and interaction terms were used to calculate the difference-in-difference in pain process and outcome measures between the baseline and follow-up periods.

Results: After order set implementation (N=888), severe pain remained more common among NHB patients (% pain scores >7 NHW vs. NHB 0 to <24 h: 22% vs. 33%, p=0.003; 24-48 h: 26% vs. 40%, p<0.001). Among all patients, pain management processes changed after implementation of the order set, with overall fewer assessments, less Opioids, and more nonopioid analgesics. However, racial and ethnic inequities in a number of assessments and in treatment were unchanged (all p for interaction >0.05), with the exception of a modest increase in NSAID doses 24-48 h postpartum for Hispanic patients.

Conclusion: A standardized pain management order set reduced overall postpartum opioid use, but did not reduce racial and ethnic disparities in pain evaluation and management. Future work should investigate racial equity-focused education and interventions designed to eliminate disparities in pain management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Getting Ours? "Girlbossing" and the Ethics of Nurse Reimbursement Models. "She's a Family Member": How Community Health Workers Impact Perinatal Mothers' Stress Through Social-Emotional Support and Connections to Programs and Resources. Diversifying Doulas Initiative: Improving Maternal Health Outcomes in People of Color Through Doula Care. Improving Weight Bias Awareness Among Providers in the Sexual and Reproductive Health care Setting. Racial (In)Equity in South Los Angeles-Community Centered Experiences with COVID-19 Syndemics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1