儿童视力障碍对教育中阅读和识字的影响的系统综述。

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Optometry Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2023.100495
Lynne Loh, Mallika Prem-Senthil, Paul A. Constable
{"title":"儿童视力障碍对教育中阅读和识字的影响的系统综述。","authors":"Lynne Loh,&nbsp;Mallika Prem-Senthil,&nbsp;Paul A. Constable","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This systematic review evaluates current literature on the impact vision impairment has on reading and literacy levels within education.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Six databases were searched with inclusion criteria of trials or studies involving children who are blind or vision impaired, and impact on academic or school performance – including reading and literacy. 1262 articles were identified, with 61 papers undergoing full screening. Quality appraisal was performed using Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) and seven articles deemed eligible for inclusion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Included articles achieved a quality score of over 70 % using the CASP checklists. Direct comparison of articles was not possible due to methodological differences in assessing reading and literacy levels. All seven studies investigated aspects of reading speed, with additional measures of reading performance, such as reading reserve, comprehension, and reading accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Underlying trends highlighted students with a vision impairment do not perform at same level as their normally sighted peers with respect to reading performance - in terms of speed, but not ability. Additionally, early intervention to enhance literacy skills may help improve educational outcomes. Future direction should be aimed at identifying specific obstacles to learning these students face and providing interventions to improve academic outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 100495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000432/pdfft?md5=0114f1956d63993d9643cb47e7624d1b&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000432-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of the impact of childhood vision impairment on reading and literacy in education\",\"authors\":\"Lynne Loh,&nbsp;Mallika Prem-Senthil,&nbsp;Paul A. Constable\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This systematic review evaluates current literature on the impact vision impairment has on reading and literacy levels within education.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Six databases were searched with inclusion criteria of trials or studies involving children who are blind or vision impaired, and impact on academic or school performance – including reading and literacy. 1262 articles were identified, with 61 papers undergoing full screening. Quality appraisal was performed using Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) and seven articles deemed eligible for inclusion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Included articles achieved a quality score of over 70 % using the CASP checklists. Direct comparison of articles was not possible due to methodological differences in assessing reading and literacy levels. All seven studies investigated aspects of reading speed, with additional measures of reading performance, such as reading reserve, comprehension, and reading accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Underlying trends highlighted students with a vision impairment do not perform at same level as their normally sighted peers with respect to reading performance - in terms of speed, but not ability. Additionally, early intervention to enhance literacy skills may help improve educational outcomes. Future direction should be aimed at identifying specific obstacles to learning these students face and providing interventions to improve academic outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000432/pdfft?md5=0114f1956d63993d9643cb47e7624d1b&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000432-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000432\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述评估了当前关于视力障碍对教育中阅读和识字水平影响的文献。方法:在六个数据库中搜索涉及盲人或视力受损儿童的试验或研究的纳入标准,以及对学业或学校表现的影响,包括阅读和识字。1262篇文章被鉴定,其中61篇论文正在进行全面筛选。使用关键评估技能计划(CASP)和七篇被认为符合入选条件的文章进行质量评估。结果:使用CASP检查表,收录文章的质量得分超过70%。由于评估阅读和识字水平的方法差异,无法直接比较文章。所有七项研究都调查了阅读速度的各个方面,并对阅读表现进行了额外的测量,如阅读储备、理解和阅读准确性。讨论:潜在趋势强调,视力受损的学生在阅读表现方面与视力正常的同龄人表现不一样——在速度方面,但在能力方面。此外,提高识字技能的早期干预可能有助于改善教育成果。未来的方向应该是确定这些学生在学习方面面临的具体障碍,并提供干预措施来提高学业成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of the impact of childhood vision impairment on reading and literacy in education

Purpose

This systematic review evaluates current literature on the impact vision impairment has on reading and literacy levels within education.

Methods

Six databases were searched with inclusion criteria of trials or studies involving children who are blind or vision impaired, and impact on academic or school performance – including reading and literacy. 1262 articles were identified, with 61 papers undergoing full screening. Quality appraisal was performed using Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) and seven articles deemed eligible for inclusion.

Results

Included articles achieved a quality score of over 70 % using the CASP checklists. Direct comparison of articles was not possible due to methodological differences in assessing reading and literacy levels. All seven studies investigated aspects of reading speed, with additional measures of reading performance, such as reading reserve, comprehension, and reading accuracy.

Discussion

Underlying trends highlighted students with a vision impairment do not perform at same level as their normally sighted peers with respect to reading performance - in terms of speed, but not ability. Additionally, early intervention to enhance literacy skills may help improve educational outcomes. Future direction should be aimed at identifying specific obstacles to learning these students face and providing interventions to improve academic outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Blue light stimulation of the optic nerve head reduces melatonin levels in rabbit posterior segment Effect of a vergence-accommodation conflict induced during a 30-minute Virtual Reality game on vergence-accommodation parameters and related symptoms Visual performance of a new trifocal intraocular lens design evaluated with a clinical adaptative optics visual simulator Analysis of patient referrals from primary care to ophthalmology. The role of the optometrist Corneal higher-order aberrations in different types of irregular cornea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1