Maria Chiara Del Piccolo, Lucia Valmaggia, Claire Henderson, Tom J Spencer, David Lewis, Sharon Fitzell, Sara Edwards, Carys Evans, Stefania Tognin
{"title":"个体安置和支持,重点关注精神病临床高危青年的就业和教育:一项可行性研究。","authors":"Maria Chiara Del Piccolo, Lucia Valmaggia, Claire Henderson, Tom J Spencer, David Lewis, Sharon Fitzell, Sara Edwards, Carys Evans, Stefania Tognin","doi":"10.1037/prj0000585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing Individual Placement and Support (IPS) with a focus on educational and employment goals, within a clinical service for the early detection of individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Between June 2019 and April 2021, participants were recruited and received up to 6 (± 2) months support. <i>Primary outcome</i>: Enrolled participants, attended sessions, and disengagement rates were analyzed to assess feasibility.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>Enrollment in mainstream education or/and employment, hours spent working or/and studying, salary, level of functioning, and self-efficacy at baseline and follow-up were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one participants were recruited, 13 of whom were remotely recruited after the first COVID-19 lockdown. Dropout rates were relatively low (16.1%), and 26 participants (83.9%) completed the program. Each participant received on average nine sessions (<i>M</i> = 9.65; <i>SD</i> = 4.92). <i>Secondary outcomes</i>: At follow-up, 73.1% participants were employed, working on average more hours per week, <i>t</i>(25) = -2.725; <i>p</i> = .012, and were earning significantly more money, <i>t</i>(25) = -3.702; <i>p</i> = .001, compared to baseline. Gains in educational outcomes were less clear. Global Assessment of Functioning, <i>t</i> = 248.50; <i>p</i> = .001, and Social Occupational Functioning, <i>t</i>(25) = -3.273; <i>p</i> = .003, were significantly higher at 6-month follow-up compared to baseline. No differences were found in participants' self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>Findings indicate that research procedures are appropriate and that IPS implementation within a CHR clinical team is feasible. Secondary outcomes also suggest that IPS may be a beneficial intervention for young people at CHR. A longer follow-up might be needed to assess its impact on educational outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"56-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual placement and support focusing on employment and education for young people at clinical high risk of psychosis: A feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Chiara Del Piccolo, Lucia Valmaggia, Claire Henderson, Tom J Spencer, David Lewis, Sharon Fitzell, Sara Edwards, Carys Evans, Stefania Tognin\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/prj0000585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing Individual Placement and Support (IPS) with a focus on educational and employment goals, within a clinical service for the early detection of individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Between June 2019 and April 2021, participants were recruited and received up to 6 (± 2) months support. <i>Primary outcome</i>: Enrolled participants, attended sessions, and disengagement rates were analyzed to assess feasibility.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>Enrollment in mainstream education or/and employment, hours spent working or/and studying, salary, level of functioning, and self-efficacy at baseline and follow-up were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one participants were recruited, 13 of whom were remotely recruited after the first COVID-19 lockdown. Dropout rates were relatively low (16.1%), and 26 participants (83.9%) completed the program. Each participant received on average nine sessions (<i>M</i> = 9.65; <i>SD</i> = 4.92). <i>Secondary outcomes</i>: At follow-up, 73.1% participants were employed, working on average more hours per week, <i>t</i>(25) = -2.725; <i>p</i> = .012, and were earning significantly more money, <i>t</i>(25) = -3.702; <i>p</i> = .001, compared to baseline. Gains in educational outcomes were less clear. Global Assessment of Functioning, <i>t</i> = 248.50; <i>p</i> = .001, and Social Occupational Functioning, <i>t</i>(25) = -3.273; <i>p</i> = .003, were significantly higher at 6-month follow-up compared to baseline. No differences were found in participants' self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>Findings indicate that research procedures are appropriate and that IPS implementation within a CHR clinical team is feasible. Secondary outcomes also suggest that IPS may be a beneficial intervention for young people at CHR. A longer follow-up might be needed to assess its impact on educational outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"56-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000585\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000585","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Individual placement and support focusing on employment and education for young people at clinical high risk of psychosis: A feasibility study.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing Individual Placement and Support (IPS) with a focus on educational and employment goals, within a clinical service for the early detection of individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis.
Method: Between June 2019 and April 2021, participants were recruited and received up to 6 (± 2) months support. Primary outcome: Enrolled participants, attended sessions, and disengagement rates were analyzed to assess feasibility.
Secondary outcomes: Enrollment in mainstream education or/and employment, hours spent working or/and studying, salary, level of functioning, and self-efficacy at baseline and follow-up were compared.
Results: Thirty-one participants were recruited, 13 of whom were remotely recruited after the first COVID-19 lockdown. Dropout rates were relatively low (16.1%), and 26 participants (83.9%) completed the program. Each participant received on average nine sessions (M = 9.65; SD = 4.92). Secondary outcomes: At follow-up, 73.1% participants were employed, working on average more hours per week, t(25) = -2.725; p = .012, and were earning significantly more money, t(25) = -3.702; p = .001, compared to baseline. Gains in educational outcomes were less clear. Global Assessment of Functioning, t = 248.50; p = .001, and Social Occupational Functioning, t(25) = -3.273; p = .003, were significantly higher at 6-month follow-up compared to baseline. No differences were found in participants' self-efficacy.
Conclusions and implications for practice: Findings indicate that research procedures are appropriate and that IPS implementation within a CHR clinical team is feasible. Secondary outcomes also suggest that IPS may be a beneficial intervention for young people at CHR. A longer follow-up might be needed to assess its impact on educational outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is sponsored by the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, at Boston University"s Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences and by the US Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (USPRA) . The mission of the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is to promote the development of new knowledge related to psychiatric rehabilitation and recovery of persons with serious mental illnesses.