减少住院患者不适当物理治疗咨询的干预措施:一项质量改进举措。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000407
Moksha Patel, Tiffany A Gardner, Christopher White, Angela Keniston, Becky Maassen, Emily Gottenborg
{"title":"减少住院患者不适当物理治疗咨询的干预措施:一项质量改进举措。","authors":"Moksha Patel, Tiffany A Gardner, Christopher White, Angela Keniston, Becky Maassen, Emily Gottenborg","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Physical therapy (PT) in inpatient settings is a limited and valuable resource. Inappropriate PT consultation is costly and can lead to delays in care and discharge planning. Baseline data at an academic hospital revealed that approximately one in four PT consults were inappropriate (n = 29,230) across all services, as defined by an activity measure post-acute care \"6-Clicks\" basic mobility score of >22. Our interdisciplinary quality improvement team used the Six Sigma methodology to address this problem. We performed a root-cause analysis that identified high-impact root causes and implemented two targeted interventions: (1) A modified electronic health record PT order with clinical-decision support, and (2) nursing role change to assume PT-ordering responsibility. The rate of inappropriate PT consults decreased from 23.9% to <10% postintervention across all inpatient units, with the nursing role change reaching statistical significance (p < .0019). Our multifaceted intervention contributed to a significant reduction in unnecessary PT consults, expediting evaluation of patients qualifying for skilled inpatient therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 6","pages":"332-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to Reduce Inappropriate Physical Therapy Consultation in the Inpatient Setting: A Quality Improvement Initiative.\",\"authors\":\"Moksha Patel, Tiffany A Gardner, Christopher White, Angela Keniston, Becky Maassen, Emily Gottenborg\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Physical therapy (PT) in inpatient settings is a limited and valuable resource. Inappropriate PT consultation is costly and can lead to delays in care and discharge planning. Baseline data at an academic hospital revealed that approximately one in four PT consults were inappropriate (n = 29,230) across all services, as defined by an activity measure post-acute care \\\"6-Clicks\\\" basic mobility score of >22. Our interdisciplinary quality improvement team used the Six Sigma methodology to address this problem. We performed a root-cause analysis that identified high-impact root causes and implemented two targeted interventions: (1) A modified electronic health record PT order with clinical-decision support, and (2) nursing role change to assume PT-ordering responsibility. The rate of inappropriate PT consults decreased from 23.9% to <10% postintervention across all inpatient units, with the nursing role change reaching statistical significance (p < .0019). Our multifaceted intervention contributed to a significant reduction in unnecessary PT consults, expediting evaluation of patients qualifying for skilled inpatient therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"332-339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000407\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:住院环境中的物理治疗(PT)是一种有限且有价值的资源。不适当的PT咨询费用高昂,可能导致护理和出院计划的延误。一家学术医院的基线数据显示,根据急性护理后活动测量“6次点击”的基本行动能力得分>22的定义,在所有服务中,大约四分之一的PT咨询是不合适的(n=29230)。我们的跨学科质量改进团队使用六西格玛方法来解决这个问题。我们进行了根本原因分析,确定了影响较大的根本原因,并实施了两项有针对性的干预措施:(1)在临床决策支持下修改了电子健康记录PT命令,以及(2)改变护理角色以承担PT命令责任。PT咨询不当率从23.9%下降到
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interventions to Reduce Inappropriate Physical Therapy Consultation in the Inpatient Setting: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Abstract: Physical therapy (PT) in inpatient settings is a limited and valuable resource. Inappropriate PT consultation is costly and can lead to delays in care and discharge planning. Baseline data at an academic hospital revealed that approximately one in four PT consults were inappropriate (n = 29,230) across all services, as defined by an activity measure post-acute care "6-Clicks" basic mobility score of >22. Our interdisciplinary quality improvement team used the Six Sigma methodology to address this problem. We performed a root-cause analysis that identified high-impact root causes and implemented two targeted interventions: (1) A modified electronic health record PT order with clinical-decision support, and (2) nursing role change to assume PT-ordering responsibility. The rate of inappropriate PT consults decreased from 23.9% to <10% postintervention across all inpatient units, with the nursing role change reaching statistical significance (p < .0019). Our multifaceted intervention contributed to a significant reduction in unnecessary PT consults, expediting evaluation of patients qualifying for skilled inpatient therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Workplace Violence Reporting in a Multisite Hospital Setting: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Preoperative Optimization of Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Single Institution Cohort. Personalizing Quality Improvement: Addressing Anticoagulation Gaps in Atrial Fibrillation. Implementation of an Evidence-Based Treatment Protocol and Order Set for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome. Improving Time to Antibiotics for Long-Bone Open Fractures: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1