核心成果集以及我们为什么应该接受它们。

Satheesh Elangovan
{"title":"核心成果集以及我们为什么应该接受它们。","authors":"Satheesh Elangovan","doi":"10.11607/prd.2023.6.e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical research aims to enhance the quality of life of our patients and improve the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. To assess the efficacy and effectiveness of an intervention, clinical researchers employ a variety of outcome measures, which fall under true, surrogate, or composite outcomes categories. Concerning outcome measures, two questions arise: (1) How relevant are these outcomes to our stakeholders (patients, providers, and policymakers)? (2) How accurately do these measures assess the change in the quality of life of our patients after an intervention? The solution to the first question lies in the development of core outcome sets (COS) based on input from stakeholders. To appropriately address the latter question, it is of paramount importance to incorporate dental patient-reported outcome measures (dPROMs) in clinical trials. Therefore, developing COS that include dPROMs for a particular intervention is critical for addressing the above questions and elevating the level of clinical research in the dental field.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"43 6","pages":"652-653"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Core Outcome Sets and Why We Should Embrace Them.\",\"authors\":\"Satheesh Elangovan\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/prd.2023.6.e\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical research aims to enhance the quality of life of our patients and improve the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. To assess the efficacy and effectiveness of an intervention, clinical researchers employ a variety of outcome measures, which fall under true, surrogate, or composite outcomes categories. Concerning outcome measures, two questions arise: (1) How relevant are these outcomes to our stakeholders (patients, providers, and policymakers)? (2) How accurately do these measures assess the change in the quality of life of our patients after an intervention? The solution to the first question lies in the development of core outcome sets (COS) based on input from stakeholders. To appropriately address the latter question, it is of paramount importance to incorporate dental patient-reported outcome measures (dPROMs) in clinical trials. Therefore, developing COS that include dPROMs for a particular intervention is critical for addressing the above questions and elevating the level of clinical research in the dental field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry\",\"volume\":\"43 6\",\"pages\":\"652-653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2023.6.e\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2023.6.e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床研究旨在提高患者的生活质量,改善治疗干预措施的成本效益。为了评估干预措施的疗效和有效性,临床研究人员采用了各种结果测量方法,包括真实结果、替代结果或综合结果等类别。关于结果测量,有两个问题:(1) 这些结果与我们的利益相关者(患者、医疗服务提供者和决策者)有多大关系?(2) 这些测量结果如何准确评估干预后患者生活质量的变化?第一个问题的解决方案在于根据利益相关者的意见制定核心结果集(COS)。1 因此,开发包含特定干预措施的 dPROMs 的核心结果集对于解决上述问题和提高口腔医学领域的临床研究水平至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Core Outcome Sets and Why We Should Embrace Them.

Clinical research aims to enhance the quality of life of our patients and improve the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. To assess the efficacy and effectiveness of an intervention, clinical researchers employ a variety of outcome measures, which fall under true, surrogate, or composite outcomes categories. Concerning outcome measures, two questions arise: (1) How relevant are these outcomes to our stakeholders (patients, providers, and policymakers)? (2) How accurately do these measures assess the change in the quality of life of our patients after an intervention? The solution to the first question lies in the development of core outcome sets (COS) based on input from stakeholders. To appropriately address the latter question, it is of paramount importance to incorporate dental patient-reported outcome measures (dPROMs) in clinical trials. Therefore, developing COS that include dPROMs for a particular intervention is critical for addressing the above questions and elevating the level of clinical research in the dental field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Cement- Versus Screw-Retained Implant Positioning in the Esthetic Zone on Emergence Angle: A Proof-of-Principle Study. The Management of Gingival Fenestration: A Series of Three Cases. Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Patient Communication: Current Possibilities. Autonomous Dental Implant Robotic System Utilization for Implant Placement and Transcrestal Sinus Elevation Using Osseodensification: A Case Report. Alveolar Ridge Preservation Procedures Performed with Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft: Clinical and Histologic Outcomes in a Case Series: Part II.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1