欧洲青光眼协会青光眼护理研究重点。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY British Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1136/bjo-2023-323648
Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Noleen McCorry, Andrew J Tatham, Stelios Georgoulas, Panayiota Founti, Cedric Schweitzer, Frances Meier-Gibbons, Philippe Denis, Anja Tuulonen, Gauti Johannesson, José María Martínez de la Casa, Verena Prokosch, Dimitrios A Giannoulis, Luis Abegão Pinto, David Garway-Heath, Fotis Topouzis
{"title":"欧洲青光眼协会青光眼护理研究重点。","authors":"Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Noleen McCorry, Andrew J Tatham, Stelios Georgoulas, Panayiota Founti, Cedric Schweitzer, Frances Meier-Gibbons, Philippe Denis, Anja Tuulonen, Gauti Johannesson, José María Martínez de la Casa, Verena Prokosch, Dimitrios A Giannoulis, Luis Abegão Pinto, David Garway-Heath, Fotis Topouzis","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2023-323648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The goal of health research is to improve patients care and outcomes. Thus, it is essential that research addresses questions that are important to patients and clinicians. The aim of this study was to develop a list of priorities for glaucoma research involving stakeholders from different countries in Europe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a three-phase method, including a two-round electronic Delphi survey and a workshop. The clinician and patient electronic surveys were conducted in parallel and independently. For phase I, the survey was distributed to patients from 27 European countries in 6 different languages, and to European Glaucoma Society members, ophthalmologists with expertise in glaucoma care, asking to name up to five research priorities. During phase II, participants were asked to rank the questions identified in phase I using a Likert scale. Phase III was a 1 day workshop with patients and clinicians. The purpose was to make decisions about the 10 most important research priorities using the top 20 priorities identified by patients and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In phase I, 308 patients and 150 clinicians were involved. In phase II, the highest-ranking priority for both patients and clinicians was 'treatments to restore vision'. In phase III, eight patients and four clinicians were involved. The top three priorities were 'treatments to stop sight loss', 'treatments to restore vision' and 'improved detection of worsening glaucoma'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have developed a list of priorities for glaucoma research involving clinicians and patients from different European countries that will help guide research efforts and investment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European Glaucoma Society research priorities for glaucoma care.\",\"authors\":\"Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Noleen McCorry, Andrew J Tatham, Stelios Georgoulas, Panayiota Founti, Cedric Schweitzer, Frances Meier-Gibbons, Philippe Denis, Anja Tuulonen, Gauti Johannesson, José María Martínez de la Casa, Verena Prokosch, Dimitrios A Giannoulis, Luis Abegão Pinto, David Garway-Heath, Fotis Topouzis\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bjo-2023-323648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The goal of health research is to improve patients care and outcomes. Thus, it is essential that research addresses questions that are important to patients and clinicians. The aim of this study was to develop a list of priorities for glaucoma research involving stakeholders from different countries in Europe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a three-phase method, including a two-round electronic Delphi survey and a workshop. The clinician and patient electronic surveys were conducted in parallel and independently. For phase I, the survey was distributed to patients from 27 European countries in 6 different languages, and to European Glaucoma Society members, ophthalmologists with expertise in glaucoma care, asking to name up to five research priorities. During phase II, participants were asked to rank the questions identified in phase I using a Likert scale. Phase III was a 1 day workshop with patients and clinicians. The purpose was to make decisions about the 10 most important research priorities using the top 20 priorities identified by patients and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In phase I, 308 patients and 150 clinicians were involved. In phase II, the highest-ranking priority for both patients and clinicians was 'treatments to restore vision'. In phase III, eight patients and four clinicians were involved. The top three priorities were 'treatments to stop sight loss', 'treatments to restore vision' and 'improved detection of worsening glaucoma'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have developed a list of priorities for glaucoma research involving clinicians and patients from different European countries that will help guide research efforts and investment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287634/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-323648\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-323648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:健康研究的目标是改善患者的护理和结果。因此,研究必须解决对患者和临床医生很重要的问题。本研究的目的是制定一份青光眼研究的优先事项清单,涉及欧洲不同国家的利益相关者。方法:我们使用了三阶段方法,包括两轮电子德尔菲调查和研讨会。临床医生和患者的电子调查是平行和独立进行的。在第一阶段,该调查以6种不同的语言分发给了来自27个欧洲国家的患者,以及欧洲青光眼协会成员,即在青光眼护理方面具有专业知识的眼科医生,要求说出多达五个研究重点。在第二阶段,参与者被要求使用Likert量表对第一阶段确定的问题进行排名。第三阶段是1 与患者和临床医生的日间研讨会。目的是利用患者和临床医生确定的前20个优先事项,就10个最重要的研究优先事项做出决定。结果:在第一阶段,308名患者和150名临床医生参与其中。在第二阶段,患者和临床医生的最高优先事项是“恢复视力的治疗”。在第三阶段,8名患者和4名临床医生参与其中。前三个优先事项是“停止视力丧失的治疗”、“恢复视力的治疗”和“改善青光眼恶化的检测”。结论:我们制定了一份青光眼研究的优先事项清单,涉及来自不同欧洲国家的临床医生和患者,这将有助于指导研究工作和投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
European Glaucoma Society research priorities for glaucoma care.

Background/aims: The goal of health research is to improve patients care and outcomes. Thus, it is essential that research addresses questions that are important to patients and clinicians. The aim of this study was to develop a list of priorities for glaucoma research involving stakeholders from different countries in Europe.

Methods: We used a three-phase method, including a two-round electronic Delphi survey and a workshop. The clinician and patient electronic surveys were conducted in parallel and independently. For phase I, the survey was distributed to patients from 27 European countries in 6 different languages, and to European Glaucoma Society members, ophthalmologists with expertise in glaucoma care, asking to name up to five research priorities. During phase II, participants were asked to rank the questions identified in phase I using a Likert scale. Phase III was a 1 day workshop with patients and clinicians. The purpose was to make decisions about the 10 most important research priorities using the top 20 priorities identified by patients and clinicians.

Results: In phase I, 308 patients and 150 clinicians were involved. In phase II, the highest-ranking priority for both patients and clinicians was 'treatments to restore vision'. In phase III, eight patients and four clinicians were involved. The top three priorities were 'treatments to stop sight loss', 'treatments to restore vision' and 'improved detection of worsening glaucoma'.

Conclusion: We have developed a list of priorities for glaucoma research involving clinicians and patients from different European countries that will help guide research efforts and investment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
期刊最新文献
Impact of microorganism virulence on endophthalmitis outcomes Progressive inner retinal neurodegeneration in non-proliferative macular telangiectasia type 2 Effect of intravenous methylprednisolone on serum antibody levels in thyroid eye disease The aqueous humour dynamics in primary angle closure disease: a computational study Retinal curvature in Chinese children with myopia measured by ultra-widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1