使用六氢大麻酚大麻产品的个人调查研究:使用模式和感知效果。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1089/can.2023.0143
Morgan L Ferretti, L Riley Gournay, Mia G Bingaman, Ellen W Leen-Feldner
{"title":"使用六氢大麻酚大麻产品的个人调查研究:使用模式和感知效果。","authors":"Morgan L Ferretti, L Riley Gournay, Mia G Bingaman, Ellen W Leen-Feldner","doi":"10.1089/can.2023.0143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Across the cannabis market, multiple cannabinoids have seen rapid growth. Considering the differing effects between specific cannabinoids, it is critical to assess effects on an individual level. Hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) is one intoxicating cannabinoid that became more accessible due to regulatory shifts. The purpose of the current study was to provide descriptive data regarding HHC use patterns and perceived effects within a sample of participants who endorsed recent HHC use. <b>Methods:</b> One hundred nine individuals self-reported use of an HHC-cannabis product at least once within 6 months and completed an HHC use questionnaire via <i>Prolific,</i> an online crowdsourcing platform. <b>Results:</b> Findings suggest recent HHC users are using HHC relatively frequently (∼10 days during the past month) for various indications, including anxiety and pain. HHC was perceived to yield more good than bad effects, including relaxation and euphoria. Approximately 17% of the sample reported adverse effects, and ∼20% of those who stopped using HHC experienced some withdrawal symptoms. Few meaningful sex differences in subjective effect ratings were observed. <b>Discussion:</b> The current study provides critical preliminary data about consumer use patterns and perceived effects related to HHC. Such data are needed to further research on the potential therapeutic as well as detrimental effects of HHC and to better inform the consumers, health professionals, and regulators about a cannabinoid that is widely available the market.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"e1385-e1394"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey Study of Individuals Using Hexahydrocannabinol Cannabis Products: Use Patterns and Perceived Effects.\",\"authors\":\"Morgan L Ferretti, L Riley Gournay, Mia G Bingaman, Ellen W Leen-Feldner\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/can.2023.0143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Across the cannabis market, multiple cannabinoids have seen rapid growth. Considering the differing effects between specific cannabinoids, it is critical to assess effects on an individual level. Hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) is one intoxicating cannabinoid that became more accessible due to regulatory shifts. The purpose of the current study was to provide descriptive data regarding HHC use patterns and perceived effects within a sample of participants who endorsed recent HHC use. <b>Methods:</b> One hundred nine individuals self-reported use of an HHC-cannabis product at least once within 6 months and completed an HHC use questionnaire via <i>Prolific,</i> an online crowdsourcing platform. <b>Results:</b> Findings suggest recent HHC users are using HHC relatively frequently (∼10 days during the past month) for various indications, including anxiety and pain. HHC was perceived to yield more good than bad effects, including relaxation and euphoria. Approximately 17% of the sample reported adverse effects, and ∼20% of those who stopped using HHC experienced some withdrawal symptoms. Few meaningful sex differences in subjective effect ratings were observed. <b>Discussion:</b> The current study provides critical preliminary data about consumer use patterns and perceived effects related to HHC. Such data are needed to further research on the potential therapeutic as well as detrimental effects of HHC and to better inform the consumers, health professionals, and regulators about a cannabinoid that is widely available the market.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1385-e1394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2023.0143\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2023.0143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在整个大麻市场上,多种大麻素都出现了快速增长。考虑到特定大麻素之间的不同影响,评估个体水平的影响至关重要。六氢大麻酚(HHC)是一种令人陶醉的大麻素,由于监管变化,它变得更容易获得。本研究的目的是在支持最近使用HHC的参与者样本中提供有关HHC使用模式和感知效果的描述性数据。方法:109人自我报告在6个月内至少使用过一次HHC大麻产品,并通过在线众包平台Prolific完成了HHC使用问卷。结果:研究结果表明,最近的HHC使用者相对频繁地使用HHC(在过去的一个月里持续了10天),用于各种适应症,包括焦虑和疼痛。HHC被认为产生的好处多于坏处,包括放松和欣快感。大约17%的样本报告了不良反应,约20%停止使用HHC的患者出现了一些戒断症状。在主观效果评分中几乎没有观察到有意义的性别差异。讨论:目前的研究提供了关于消费者使用模式和与HHC相关的感知效果的关键初步数据。需要这些数据来进一步研究HHC的潜在治疗和有害影响,并更好地向消费者、卫生专业人员和监管机构了解市场上广泛存在的大麻素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Survey Study of Individuals Using Hexahydrocannabinol Cannabis Products: Use Patterns and Perceived Effects.

Introduction: Across the cannabis market, multiple cannabinoids have seen rapid growth. Considering the differing effects between specific cannabinoids, it is critical to assess effects on an individual level. Hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) is one intoxicating cannabinoid that became more accessible due to regulatory shifts. The purpose of the current study was to provide descriptive data regarding HHC use patterns and perceived effects within a sample of participants who endorsed recent HHC use. Methods: One hundred nine individuals self-reported use of an HHC-cannabis product at least once within 6 months and completed an HHC use questionnaire via Prolific, an online crowdsourcing platform. Results: Findings suggest recent HHC users are using HHC relatively frequently (∼10 days during the past month) for various indications, including anxiety and pain. HHC was perceived to yield more good than bad effects, including relaxation and euphoria. Approximately 17% of the sample reported adverse effects, and ∼20% of those who stopped using HHC experienced some withdrawal symptoms. Few meaningful sex differences in subjective effect ratings were observed. Discussion: The current study provides critical preliminary data about consumer use patterns and perceived effects related to HHC. Such data are needed to further research on the potential therapeutic as well as detrimental effects of HHC and to better inform the consumers, health professionals, and regulators about a cannabinoid that is widely available the market.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
164
期刊最新文献
Drug Interactions in People on Cannabidiol: Is There Cause for Concern? Federal Courts Will No Longer Need to Follow the DEA's Interpretation of Cannabis-Related Law. Minor Cannabinoid Profile of Unregulated Cannabidiol Products. Technology-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Decreasing Cannabis Use in People with Psychosis: A Systematic Review Update. Biological Response after 14-Day Cannabidiol and Propylene Glycol Inhalation in Sprague-Dawley Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1