姑息治疗和临终关怀环境下的眼部捐赠:EDiPPPP混合方法研究。

Tracy Long-Sutehall, Mike Bracher, Sarah Mollart, Jane Wale
{"title":"姑息治疗和临终关怀环境下的眼部捐赠:EDiPPPP混合方法研究。","authors":"Tracy Long-Sutehall, Mike Bracher, Sarah Mollart, Jane Wale","doi":"10.3310/KJWA6741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over 2 million people in the United Kingdom are living with sight loss with costs to the United Kingdom economy reported as £4.34 billion annually. Conditions that lead to sight loss and impaired vision can be treated if eye tissue is available for corneal transplantation, reconstructive surgery and research into eye diseases. Supply of eye tissue (only available via eye donation) is currently insufficient to meet demand; therefore, new routes are needed. Hospice and hospital-based Palliative Care Services have been reported as potential donation sources of this tissue.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To: (1) scope the size and clinical characteristics of the potential eye donation population from research sites; (2) map the donation climate of each research site; (3) identify factors that enable or challenge service providers to consider the option of eye donation from a local and national perspective; (4) identify service users' views regarding the option of eye donation and the propriety of discussing eye donation; and (5) develop and pilot an empirically based intervention designed to change behaviours in relation to eye donation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A 36-month mixed-methods, multicentre study undertaking three work packages.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Three hospice care and three hospital-based palliative care services situated in the North, Midlands and the South of England (one service of each type per region).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Work package 1 - 105 service providers. Work package 2 - 62 service users, and 156 service providers in the national survey. Work package 3 - 21 expert consultees (patient and public involvement, cross discipline).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Scoping review, retrospective note review, qualitative interviews/focus groups, participant observation, secondary analysis of primary data, national survey, transparent expert consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><b><i>Potential</i></b>: The retrospective notes review demonstrated that of 1199 deceased patients' notes, 553 (46%) patients met the criteria for eye donation (56%, <i>n</i> = 337 in hospice care service settings and 36%, <i>n</i> = 216 in hospital palliative care service). <b><i>Practice</i>:</b> Less than 4% of all cases agreed as eligible for donation had been approached or referred for eye donation. Eye donation is not currently an embedded practice at local and national levels. <b><i>Perceptions</i>:</b> Service providers were motivated to discuss eye donation but lacked opportunity and capability. Service users were willing and able to hold conversations about eye donation but were not aware of the option and had not had the option discussed with them. <b><i>Preferences:</i></b> Service users wanted to be offered the option of eye donation, and service providers wanted bespoke education and training related to eye donation. Evaluation of the developed intervention <i>STEPS - Support Toolkit for Eye donation in Palliative care Settings</i> will follow implementation of the full intervention (expected to begin in October 2022).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Due to the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical sites, partner organisations and national service providers, only two elements of the developed intervention have been pilot tested for proof of concept and the response rate to the national survey was low (8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant potential exists for eye donation from hospice care and hospital palliative care services; however, individual and organisational behaviour as well as information system-based changes are needed to maximise this potential.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Evaluation of the <i>STEPS - Support Toolkit for Eye donation in Palliative care Settings;</i> Research exploring the wider public knowledge and views regarding eye donation; research exploring the use of language by National Health Service Blood and Transplant-Tissue and Eye Services in their public-facing infographics, communications and campaigns (specifically the use of the term eye donation).</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered as ISRCTN14243635: Eye donation from palliative care and hospice care settings.</p><p><strong>Funding details: </strong>This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (17/49/42) and will be published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 11, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.</p>","PeriodicalId":73204,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eye donation from palliative and hospice care contexts: the EDiPPPP mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Tracy Long-Sutehall, Mike Bracher, Sarah Mollart, Jane Wale\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/KJWA6741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over 2 million people in the United Kingdom are living with sight loss with costs to the United Kingdom economy reported as £4.34 billion annually. Conditions that lead to sight loss and impaired vision can be treated if eye tissue is available for corneal transplantation, reconstructive surgery and research into eye diseases. Supply of eye tissue (only available via eye donation) is currently insufficient to meet demand; therefore, new routes are needed. Hospice and hospital-based Palliative Care Services have been reported as potential donation sources of this tissue.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To: (1) scope the size and clinical characteristics of the potential eye donation population from research sites; (2) map the donation climate of each research site; (3) identify factors that enable or challenge service providers to consider the option of eye donation from a local and national perspective; (4) identify service users' views regarding the option of eye donation and the propriety of discussing eye donation; and (5) develop and pilot an empirically based intervention designed to change behaviours in relation to eye donation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A 36-month mixed-methods, multicentre study undertaking three work packages.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Three hospice care and three hospital-based palliative care services situated in the North, Midlands and the South of England (one service of each type per region).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Work package 1 - 105 service providers. Work package 2 - 62 service users, and 156 service providers in the national survey. Work package 3 - 21 expert consultees (patient and public involvement, cross discipline).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Scoping review, retrospective note review, qualitative interviews/focus groups, participant observation, secondary analysis of primary data, national survey, transparent expert consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><b><i>Potential</i></b>: The retrospective notes review demonstrated that of 1199 deceased patients' notes, 553 (46%) patients met the criteria for eye donation (56%, <i>n</i> = 337 in hospice care service settings and 36%, <i>n</i> = 216 in hospital palliative care service). <b><i>Practice</i>:</b> Less than 4% of all cases agreed as eligible for donation had been approached or referred for eye donation. Eye donation is not currently an embedded practice at local and national levels. <b><i>Perceptions</i>:</b> Service providers were motivated to discuss eye donation but lacked opportunity and capability. Service users were willing and able to hold conversations about eye donation but were not aware of the option and had not had the option discussed with them. <b><i>Preferences:</i></b> Service users wanted to be offered the option of eye donation, and service providers wanted bespoke education and training related to eye donation. Evaluation of the developed intervention <i>STEPS - Support Toolkit for Eye donation in Palliative care Settings</i> will follow implementation of the full intervention (expected to begin in October 2022).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Due to the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical sites, partner organisations and national service providers, only two elements of the developed intervention have been pilot tested for proof of concept and the response rate to the national survey was low (8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant potential exists for eye donation from hospice care and hospital palliative care services; however, individual and organisational behaviour as well as information system-based changes are needed to maximise this potential.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Evaluation of the <i>STEPS - Support Toolkit for Eye donation in Palliative care Settings;</i> Research exploring the wider public knowledge and views regarding eye donation; research exploring the use of language by National Health Service Blood and Transplant-Tissue and Eye Services in their public-facing infographics, communications and campaigns (specifically the use of the term eye donation).</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered as ISRCTN14243635: Eye donation from palliative care and hospice care settings.</p><p><strong>Funding details: </strong>This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (17/49/42) and will be published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 11, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and social care delivery research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and social care delivery research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/KJWA6741\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/KJWA6741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:英国有200多万人患有失明,据报道,英国每年的经济损失为43.4亿英镑。如果眼睛组织可用于角膜移植、重建手术和眼病研究,那么导致视力下降和视力受损的情况可以得到治疗。眼部组织的供应(只能通过眼部捐赠获得)目前不足以满足需求;因此,需要新的路线。据报道,临终关怀和基于医院的姑息治疗服务是这种组织的潜在捐赠来源。目的:(1)确定研究地点潜在供眼人群的规模和临床特征;(2) 绘制每个研究地点的捐赠气候图;(3) 确定使服务提供商能够或挑战服务提供商从地方和国家角度考虑眼睛捐赠选项的因素;(4) 识别服务用户对眼睛捐赠的选择和讨论眼睛捐赠的适当性的看法;以及(5)开发和试行一种基于经验的干预措施,旨在改变与眼睛捐赠有关的行为。设计:一项为期36个月的混合方法、多中心研究,包含三个工作包。设置:位于英格兰北部、中部和南部的三个临终关怀和三个基于医院的姑息治疗服务(每个地区每种类型一项服务)。参与者:工作包1-105服务提供商。工作包2-在全国调查中有62个服务用户和156个服务提供商。工作包3-21名专家咨询对象(患者和公众参与,跨学科)。数据来源:范围界定审查、回顾性说明审查、定性访谈/焦点小组、参与者观察、主要数据的二次分析、全国调查、透明的专家咨询。结果:潜力:回顾性笔记审查表明,在1199名已故患者的笔记中,553名(46%)患者符合眼部捐献标准(56%,n=337在临终关怀服务机构,36%,n=216在医院姑息治疗服务机构)。实践:在所有同意符合捐赠条件的病例中,只有不到4%的病例被要求或转介进行眼部捐赠。目前,眼科捐赠并不是地方和国家层面的一种根深蒂固的做法。看法:服务提供者有动机讨论眼睛捐赠,但缺乏机会和能力。服务用户愿意并能够就眼睛捐赠进行对话,但他们不知道这个选项,也没有与他们讨论过这个选项。偏好:服务用户希望获得眼睛捐赠的选择,服务提供商希望获得与眼睛捐赠相关的定制教育和培训。在全面干预实施后(预计将于2022年10月开始),将对开发的干预措施STEPS-姑息治疗环境中眼睛捐赠支持工具包进行评估。限制:由于新冠肺炎大流行对临床场所、合作组织和国家服务提供商的重大影响,所开发的干预措施中只有两个要素经过了概念验证的试点测试,对全国调查的响应率较低(8%);然而,需要个人和组织行为以及基于信息系统的变革来最大限度地发挥这种潜力。未来的工作:评估STEPS——姑息治疗环境中眼睛捐赠的支持工具包;研究探索更广泛的公众知识和对眼睛捐赠的看法;探索国家卫生服务局血液和移植组织及眼科服务部门在面向公众的信息图、沟通和宣传活动中使用语言的研究(特别是眼睛捐赠一词的使用)。试验注册:该试验注册为ISRCTN14243635:姑息治疗和临终关怀机构的眼睛捐赠。资金细节:该项目由国家卫生与护理研究所(NIHR)卫生与社会护理提供研究计划资助(17/49/42),并将在《卫生与社会保健提供研究》上全文发表;第11卷第20期。有关更多项目信息,请访问NIHR期刊图书馆网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eye donation from palliative and hospice care contexts: the EDiPPPP mixed-methods study.

Background: Over 2 million people in the United Kingdom are living with sight loss with costs to the United Kingdom economy reported as £4.34 billion annually. Conditions that lead to sight loss and impaired vision can be treated if eye tissue is available for corneal transplantation, reconstructive surgery and research into eye diseases. Supply of eye tissue (only available via eye donation) is currently insufficient to meet demand; therefore, new routes are needed. Hospice and hospital-based Palliative Care Services have been reported as potential donation sources of this tissue.

Objectives: To: (1) scope the size and clinical characteristics of the potential eye donation population from research sites; (2) map the donation climate of each research site; (3) identify factors that enable or challenge service providers to consider the option of eye donation from a local and national perspective; (4) identify service users' views regarding the option of eye donation and the propriety of discussing eye donation; and (5) develop and pilot an empirically based intervention designed to change behaviours in relation to eye donation.

Design: A 36-month mixed-methods, multicentre study undertaking three work packages.

Settings: Three hospice care and three hospital-based palliative care services situated in the North, Midlands and the South of England (one service of each type per region).

Participants: Work package 1 - 105 service providers. Work package 2 - 62 service users, and 156 service providers in the national survey. Work package 3 - 21 expert consultees (patient and public involvement, cross discipline).

Data sources: Scoping review, retrospective note review, qualitative interviews/focus groups, participant observation, secondary analysis of primary data, national survey, transparent expert consultation.

Results: Potential: The retrospective notes review demonstrated that of 1199 deceased patients' notes, 553 (46%) patients met the criteria for eye donation (56%, n = 337 in hospice care service settings and 36%, n = 216 in hospital palliative care service). Practice: Less than 4% of all cases agreed as eligible for donation had been approached or referred for eye donation. Eye donation is not currently an embedded practice at local and national levels. Perceptions: Service providers were motivated to discuss eye donation but lacked opportunity and capability. Service users were willing and able to hold conversations about eye donation but were not aware of the option and had not had the option discussed with them. Preferences: Service users wanted to be offered the option of eye donation, and service providers wanted bespoke education and training related to eye donation. Evaluation of the developed intervention STEPS - Support Toolkit for Eye donation in Palliative care Settings will follow implementation of the full intervention (expected to begin in October 2022).

Limitations: Due to the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical sites, partner organisations and national service providers, only two elements of the developed intervention have been pilot tested for proof of concept and the response rate to the national survey was low (8%).

Conclusions: Significant potential exists for eye donation from hospice care and hospital palliative care services; however, individual and organisational behaviour as well as information system-based changes are needed to maximise this potential.

Future work: Evaluation of the STEPS - Support Toolkit for Eye donation in Palliative care Settings; Research exploring the wider public knowledge and views regarding eye donation; research exploring the use of language by National Health Service Blood and Transplant-Tissue and Eye Services in their public-facing infographics, communications and campaigns (specifically the use of the term eye donation).

Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN14243635: Eye donation from palliative care and hospice care settings.

Funding details: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (17/49/42) and will be published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 11, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Causes and solutions to workplace psychological ill-health for nurses, midwives and paramedics: the Care Under Pressure 2 realist review. Relationship between staff and quality of care in care homes: StaRQ mixed methods study. Practices of falls risk assessment and prevention in acute hospital settings: a realist investigation. Safer and more efficient vital signs monitoring protocols to identify the deteriorating patients in the general hospital ward: an observational study. Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1