美国石油和天然气公司的碳排放、水力压裂和公司价值

IF 12.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Strategy and The Environment Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1002/bse.3610
André Varella Mollick, Md Ismail Haidar
{"title":"美国石油和天然气公司的碳排放、水力压裂和公司价值","authors":"André Varella Mollick,&nbsp;Md Ismail Haidar","doi":"10.1002/bse.3610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examine in this paper how firm value (market-to-book ratio, MTB) of U.S. oil and gas sector firms from 2010 to 2020 responds to carbon emissions intensity measures. We investigate three measures comprising total carbon emissions relative to assets, to market value of equity, and to net property, plant, and equipment. Our dynamic panel data approach separates the 82 firms into 35 fracking and 47 non-fracking companies to address features underlying firm financing during the shale oil revolution. Concerned investors about the companies' large carbon emissions may have pulled out of the sector. These companies may also have overleveraged when expanding into new technologies of oil production or kept larger cash flow ratios. We report lower average carbon emissions for fracking firms, together with the larger size of fracking techniques: mean of assets of $46 billion for fracking versus $12 billion for non-fracking companies. Using fixed-effects and system generalized methods of moments (SGMM) models, we find that carbon emissions decrease MTB of fracking firms more than non-fracking firms. Our dynamic panel approach provides a more accurate measure of the real effect of carbon emissions that is very robust to Tobin's <i>q</i> as alternative measure of firm value.</p>","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"33 3","pages":"2462-2477"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon emissions, fracking, and firm value of U.S. oil and gas firms\",\"authors\":\"André Varella Mollick,&nbsp;Md Ismail Haidar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bse.3610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We examine in this paper how firm value (market-to-book ratio, MTB) of U.S. oil and gas sector firms from 2010 to 2020 responds to carbon emissions intensity measures. We investigate three measures comprising total carbon emissions relative to assets, to market value of equity, and to net property, plant, and equipment. Our dynamic panel data approach separates the 82 firms into 35 fracking and 47 non-fracking companies to address features underlying firm financing during the shale oil revolution. Concerned investors about the companies' large carbon emissions may have pulled out of the sector. These companies may also have overleveraged when expanding into new technologies of oil production or kept larger cash flow ratios. We report lower average carbon emissions for fracking firms, together with the larger size of fracking techniques: mean of assets of $46 billion for fracking versus $12 billion for non-fracking companies. Using fixed-effects and system generalized methods of moments (SGMM) models, we find that carbon emissions decrease MTB of fracking firms more than non-fracking firms. Our dynamic panel approach provides a more accurate measure of the real effect of carbon emissions that is very robust to Tobin's <i>q</i> as alternative measure of firm value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"2462-2477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.3610\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.3610","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们在本文中研究了2010年至2020年美国石油和天然气行业公司的公司价值(市净比,MTB)对碳排放强度指标的反应。我们调查了三个指标,包括相对于资产的总碳排放量、相对于股权市场价值以及相对于房地产、厂房和设备的净碳排放量。我们的动态面板数据方法将82家公司分为35家水力压裂公司和47家非水力压裂公司,以解决页岩油革命期间公司融资的基本特征。担心这些公司大量碳排放的投资者可能已经退出了该行业。这些公司在拓展新的石油生产技术或保持更大的现金流比率时,也可能杠杆率过高。我们报告称,水力压裂公司的平均碳排放量较低,同时水力压裂技术规模较大:水力压裂的平均资产为460亿美元,而非水力压裂公司为120亿美元。使用固定效应和系统广义矩方法(SGMM)模型,我们发现碳排放比非水力压裂企业更能降低水力压裂企业的MTB。我们的动态面板方法提供了一个更准确的碳排放实际影响的衡量标准,这与Tobin的q作为企业价值的替代衡量标准相比非常稳健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carbon emissions, fracking, and firm value of U.S. oil and gas firms

We examine in this paper how firm value (market-to-book ratio, MTB) of U.S. oil and gas sector firms from 2010 to 2020 responds to carbon emissions intensity measures. We investigate three measures comprising total carbon emissions relative to assets, to market value of equity, and to net property, plant, and equipment. Our dynamic panel data approach separates the 82 firms into 35 fracking and 47 non-fracking companies to address features underlying firm financing during the shale oil revolution. Concerned investors about the companies' large carbon emissions may have pulled out of the sector. These companies may also have overleveraged when expanding into new technologies of oil production or kept larger cash flow ratios. We report lower average carbon emissions for fracking firms, together with the larger size of fracking techniques: mean of assets of $46 billion for fracking versus $12 billion for non-fracking companies. Using fixed-effects and system generalized methods of moments (SGMM) models, we find that carbon emissions decrease MTB of fracking firms more than non-fracking firms. Our dynamic panel approach provides a more accurate measure of the real effect of carbon emissions that is very robust to Tobin's q as alternative measure of firm value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Sustainable strategies and circular economy ecosystems: A literature review and future research agenda Beyond technique: The role of the multidimensional nature of energy accounting in shaping a better world The role of online information sources in enhancing circular consumption behaviour: Fostering sustainable consumption patterns in the digital age Personality traits and circular business models: Fostering consumer engagement with circular economy Development of a framework for blockchain technology‐based net zero strategies in the agriculture supply chain: A TISM and Grey‐DEMATEL approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1