评估基因编辑在水产养殖中的应用指南

IF 8.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES Reviews in Aquaculture Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1111/raq.12866
Nicholas A. Robinson, Tone-Kari Knutsdatter Østbye, Anne H. Kettunen, Andrew Coates, Luke T. Barrett, Diego Robledo, Tim Dempster
{"title":"评估基因编辑在水产养殖中的应用指南","authors":"Nicholas A. Robinson,&nbsp;Tone-Kari Knutsdatter Østbye,&nbsp;Anne H. Kettunen,&nbsp;Andrew Coates,&nbsp;Luke T. Barrett,&nbsp;Diego Robledo,&nbsp;Tim Dempster","doi":"10.1111/raq.12866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aquaculture creates ‘aquatic foods’ such as fish, shellfish, and seaweeds that are critical for food security. Gene editing using CRISPR-Cas9 has the potential to transform aquaculture by improving animal welfare, nutritional attributes, and farming efficiency, with benefits for environmental sustainability. However, gene editing also poses risks of harm via side effects on other important traits or genetic introgression into wild populations. Public acceptance of gene edited aquatic species will rapidly erode if risk mitigation is ineffective or not applied. Here, we review the benefits and risks for gene editing in aquaculture. A general framework for risk–benefit analysis of gene editing in aquaculture is proposed, incorporating nine key considerations: genetic impacts, ecological impacts, disease risk mitigation, nature of edit, supply chain environmental footprint, animal welfare, human nutrition, ethical business implications and impacts on local communities. When applied on a case-by-case basis, the framework will help identify how gene editing of a farmed species can most enhance production and nutritional benefits while minimising harms to animal welfare, the environment, and society.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"16 2","pages":"775-784"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12866","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A guide to assess the use of gene editing in aquaculture\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas A. Robinson,&nbsp;Tone-Kari Knutsdatter Østbye,&nbsp;Anne H. Kettunen,&nbsp;Andrew Coates,&nbsp;Luke T. Barrett,&nbsp;Diego Robledo,&nbsp;Tim Dempster\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/raq.12866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Aquaculture creates ‘aquatic foods’ such as fish, shellfish, and seaweeds that are critical for food security. Gene editing using CRISPR-Cas9 has the potential to transform aquaculture by improving animal welfare, nutritional attributes, and farming efficiency, with benefits for environmental sustainability. However, gene editing also poses risks of harm via side effects on other important traits or genetic introgression into wild populations. Public acceptance of gene edited aquatic species will rapidly erode if risk mitigation is ineffective or not applied. Here, we review the benefits and risks for gene editing in aquaculture. A general framework for risk–benefit analysis of gene editing in aquaculture is proposed, incorporating nine key considerations: genetic impacts, ecological impacts, disease risk mitigation, nature of edit, supply chain environmental footprint, animal welfare, human nutrition, ethical business implications and impacts on local communities. When applied on a case-by-case basis, the framework will help identify how gene editing of a farmed species can most enhance production and nutritional benefits while minimising harms to animal welfare, the environment, and society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Aquaculture\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"775-784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12866\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Aquaculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.12866\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.12866","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水产养殖创造了鱼类、贝类和海藻等对粮食安全至关重要的“水生食品”。使用CRISPR-Cas9进行基因编辑有可能通过提高动物福利、营养特性和养殖效率来改变水产养殖,并有利于环境可持续性。然而,基因编辑也会对其他重要性状产生副作用或基因渗入野生种群,从而带来伤害的风险。如果风险缓解无效或不应用,公众对基因编辑水生物种的接受度将迅速下降。在这里,我们回顾了基因编辑在水产养殖中的益处和风险。提出了水产养殖中基因编辑风险效益分析的一般框架,包括九个关键考虑因素:遗传影响、生态影响、疾病风险缓解、编辑的性质、供应链环境足迹、动物福利、人类营养、道德商业影响和对当地社区的影响。当在个案基础上应用时,该框架将有助于确定养殖物种的基因编辑如何最大限度地提高生产和营养效益,同时最大限度地减少对动物福利、环境和社会的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A guide to assess the use of gene editing in aquaculture

Aquaculture creates ‘aquatic foods’ such as fish, shellfish, and seaweeds that are critical for food security. Gene editing using CRISPR-Cas9 has the potential to transform aquaculture by improving animal welfare, nutritional attributes, and farming efficiency, with benefits for environmental sustainability. However, gene editing also poses risks of harm via side effects on other important traits or genetic introgression into wild populations. Public acceptance of gene edited aquatic species will rapidly erode if risk mitigation is ineffective or not applied. Here, we review the benefits and risks for gene editing in aquaculture. A general framework for risk–benefit analysis of gene editing in aquaculture is proposed, incorporating nine key considerations: genetic impacts, ecological impacts, disease risk mitigation, nature of edit, supply chain environmental footprint, animal welfare, human nutrition, ethical business implications and impacts on local communities. When applied on a case-by-case basis, the framework will help identify how gene editing of a farmed species can most enhance production and nutritional benefits while minimising harms to animal welfare, the environment, and society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.80
自引率
5.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Aquaculture is a journal that aims to provide a platform for reviews on various aspects of aquaculture science, techniques, policies, and planning. The journal publishes fully peer-reviewed review articles on topics including global, regional, and national production and market trends in aquaculture, advancements in aquaculture practices and technology, interactions between aquaculture and the environment, indigenous and alien species in aquaculture, genetics and its relation to aquaculture, as well as aquaculture product quality and traceability. The journal is indexed and abstracted in several databases including AgBiotech News & Information (CABI), AgBiotechNet, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, Environment Index (EBSCO Publishing), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) among others.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Feasibility of Sustainable Aquaculture for Common Snook Centropomus undecimalis Genome Manipulation Advances in Selected Aquaculture Organisms The Importance of Addressing Evolutionary Mismatches in the Production Management of Aquaculture Species Water Quality Impact on Fish Behavior: A Review From an Aquaculture Perspective Shrimp Intestinal Microbiota Homeostasis: Dynamic Interplay Between the Microbiota and Host Immunity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1