Lowell E. Gentry, John M. Green, Corey A. Mitchell, Luis F. Andino, Michelle K. Rolf, D. Schaefer, Emerson D. Nafziger
{"title":"在玉米-大豆轮作中,谷类-黑麦覆盖作物的分肥施氮减少了硝酸盐负荷。","authors":"Lowell E. Gentry, John M. Green, Corey A. Mitchell, Luis F. Andino, Michelle K. Rolf, D. Schaefer, Emerson D. Nafziger","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.20530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Splitting fertilizer nitrogen (N) applications and using cover crops are management strategies to reduce nitrate in tile drainage water. We investigated split fertilizer N applications to corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) on crop yields and tile nitrate loss in both corn and soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L.) in rotation from 2016 through 2019. We evaluated the inclusion of cover crops in a split-N treatment. Fertilizer N treatments included 100% in the fall; 50% in the fall + 25% at planting + 25% at side-dress; 100% as spring preplant; 75% as spring preplant (reduced N rate); 50% as spring preplant + 50% at side-dress; and 50% as spring preplant + 50% at side-dress with a cover crop. We did not find significant differences between split and single full rate N application treatments for corn yields or tile nitrate loss; however, the reduced N rate treatment significantly decreased corn yield by 10%. Cumulative tile nitrate losses (over four seasons) ranged from 115 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for all of the N in the fall to 65 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for 50% as spring preplant + 50% at side-dress with a cover crop, a decrease of 43%. Tile nitrate loss responded similarly to (corn) N treatments under both corn and soybean, with 64% of the loss under corn and 36% under soybean. Our results suggest that decreasing the fertilizer N rate may impact corn yield more than nitrate loss, while split fertilizer N application with a cover crop has potential to reduce tile nitrate loss without decreasing crop yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeq2.20530","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Split fertilizer nitrogen application with a cereal rye cover crop reduces tile nitrate loads in a corn–soybean rotation\",\"authors\":\"Lowell E. Gentry, John M. Green, Corey A. Mitchell, Luis F. Andino, Michelle K. Rolf, D. Schaefer, Emerson D. Nafziger\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeq2.20530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Splitting fertilizer nitrogen (N) applications and using cover crops are management strategies to reduce nitrate in tile drainage water. We investigated split fertilizer N applications to corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) on crop yields and tile nitrate loss in both corn and soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L.) in rotation from 2016 through 2019. We evaluated the inclusion of cover crops in a split-N treatment. Fertilizer N treatments included 100% in the fall; 50% in the fall + 25% at planting + 25% at side-dress; 100% as spring preplant; 75% as spring preplant (reduced N rate); 50% as spring preplant + 50% at side-dress; and 50% as spring preplant + 50% at side-dress with a cover crop. We did not find significant differences between split and single full rate N application treatments for corn yields or tile nitrate loss; however, the reduced N rate treatment significantly decreased corn yield by 10%. Cumulative tile nitrate losses (over four seasons) ranged from 115 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for all of the N in the fall to 65 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for 50% as spring preplant + 50% at side-dress with a cover crop, a decrease of 43%. Tile nitrate loss responded similarly to (corn) N treatments under both corn and soybean, with 64% of the loss under corn and 36% under soybean. Our results suggest that decreasing the fertilizer N rate may impact corn yield more than nitrate loss, while split fertilizer N application with a cover crop has potential to reduce tile nitrate loss without decreasing crop yield.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeq2.20530\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.20530\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.20530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
肥料氮(N)和覆盖作物的分施是在保持作物产量的同时减少排水中硝酸盐的管理策略。我们的目的是研究2016年至2019年玉米-大豆(Glycine max L.)轮作中玉米(Zea mays L.)分施氮肥对作物产量和硝酸盐损失的影响。此外,我们评估了覆盖作物对作物产量和硝酸盐损失的影响。三十六块砖排水地块用于容纳六次肥料氮处理、三次重复和两个轮作阶段。肥料氮处理如下:秋季为100%;秋季50%,种植25%,侧装25%;在春季预处理中为100%;春季预处理75%;50%用于春季预备装,50%用于侧装;50%在春季预处理中,50%在有遮盖物的侧裙中。在玉米产量或硝酸盐损失方面,我们没有发现分施氮处理与其单施配套处理之间的显著差异;但减施氮肥处理显著降低了玉米产量。瓷砖硝酸盐的累积损失范围从秋季的115 kg ha-1(100%)到春季预科的65 kg ha-2(50%),以及覆盖作物的侧装的50%,这意味着瓷砖硝酸盐减少了43%。总的来说,这项研究表明,玉米-大豆轮作中的硝酸盐负荷受天气模式(温度和降水)、施肥时间和速率以及前一作物的相互作用控制。这篇文章受版权保护。保留所有权利。
Split fertilizer nitrogen application with a cereal rye cover crop reduces tile nitrate loads in a corn–soybean rotation
Splitting fertilizer nitrogen (N) applications and using cover crops are management strategies to reduce nitrate in tile drainage water. We investigated split fertilizer N applications to corn (Zea mays L.) on crop yields and tile nitrate loss in both corn and soybean (Glycine max L.) in rotation from 2016 through 2019. We evaluated the inclusion of cover crops in a split-N treatment. Fertilizer N treatments included 100% in the fall; 50% in the fall + 25% at planting + 25% at side-dress; 100% as spring preplant; 75% as spring preplant (reduced N rate); 50% as spring preplant + 50% at side-dress; and 50% as spring preplant + 50% at side-dress with a cover crop. We did not find significant differences between split and single full rate N application treatments for corn yields or tile nitrate loss; however, the reduced N rate treatment significantly decreased corn yield by 10%. Cumulative tile nitrate losses (over four seasons) ranged from 115 kg ha−1 for all of the N in the fall to 65 kg ha−1 for 50% as spring preplant + 50% at side-dress with a cover crop, a decrease of 43%. Tile nitrate loss responded similarly to (corn) N treatments under both corn and soybean, with 64% of the loss under corn and 36% under soybean. Our results suggest that decreasing the fertilizer N rate may impact corn yield more than nitrate loss, while split fertilizer N application with a cover crop has potential to reduce tile nitrate loss without decreasing crop yield.