Karim S Ladha, Kathak Vachhani, Gretchen Gabriel, Rasheeda Darville, Karl Everett, Jodi M Gatley, Refik Saskin, Dorothy Wong, Praveen Ganty, Rita Katznelson, Alexander Huang, Joseph Fiorellino, Diana Tamir, Maxwell Slepian, Joel Katz, Hance Clarke
{"title":"过渡期疼痛服务对术后阿片类药物轨迹的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Karim S Ladha, Kathak Vachhani, Gretchen Gabriel, Rasheeda Darville, Karl Everett, Jodi M Gatley, Refik Saskin, Dorothy Wong, Praveen Ganty, Rita Katznelson, Alexander Huang, Joseph Fiorellino, Diana Tamir, Maxwell Slepian, Joel Katz, Hance Clarke","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-104709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It has been well described that a small but significant proportion of patients continue to use opioids months after surgical discharge. We sought to evaluate postdischarge opioid use of patients who were seen by a Transitional Pain Service compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative data of individuals who underwent surgery in Ontario, Canada from 2014 to 2018. Matched cohort pairs were created by matching Transitional Pain Service patients to patients of other academic hospitals in Ontario who were not enrolled in a Transitional Pain Service. Segmented regression was performed to assess changes in monthly mean daily opioid dosage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 209 Transitional Pain Service patients were matched to 209 patients who underwent surgery at other academic centers. Over the 12 months after surgery, the mean daily dose decreased by an estimated 3.53 morphine milligram equivalents (95% CI 2.67 to 4.39, p<0.001) per month for the Transitional Pain Service group, compared with a decline of only 1.05 morphine milligram equivalents (95% CI 0.43 to 1.66, p<0.001) for the controls. The difference-in-difference change in opioid use for the Transitional Pain Service group versus the control group was -2.48 morphine milligram equivalents per month (95% CI -3.54 to -1.43, p=0.003).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients enrolled in the Transitional Pain Service were able to achieve opioid dose reduction faster than in the control cohorts. The difficulty in finding an appropriate control group for this retrospective study highlights the need for future randomized controlled trials to determine efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"650-655"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a Transitional Pain Service on postoperative opioid trajectories: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Karim S Ladha, Kathak Vachhani, Gretchen Gabriel, Rasheeda Darville, Karl Everett, Jodi M Gatley, Refik Saskin, Dorothy Wong, Praveen Ganty, Rita Katznelson, Alexander Huang, Joseph Fiorellino, Diana Tamir, Maxwell Slepian, Joel Katz, Hance Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2023-104709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It has been well described that a small but significant proportion of patients continue to use opioids months after surgical discharge. We sought to evaluate postdischarge opioid use of patients who were seen by a Transitional Pain Service compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative data of individuals who underwent surgery in Ontario, Canada from 2014 to 2018. Matched cohort pairs were created by matching Transitional Pain Service patients to patients of other academic hospitals in Ontario who were not enrolled in a Transitional Pain Service. Segmented regression was performed to assess changes in monthly mean daily opioid dosage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 209 Transitional Pain Service patients were matched to 209 patients who underwent surgery at other academic centers. Over the 12 months after surgery, the mean daily dose decreased by an estimated 3.53 morphine milligram equivalents (95% CI 2.67 to 4.39, p<0.001) per month for the Transitional Pain Service group, compared with a decline of only 1.05 morphine milligram equivalents (95% CI 0.43 to 1.66, p<0.001) for the controls. The difference-in-difference change in opioid use for the Transitional Pain Service group versus the control group was -2.48 morphine milligram equivalents per month (95% CI -3.54 to -1.43, p=0.003).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients enrolled in the Transitional Pain Service were able to achieve opioid dose reduction faster than in the control cohorts. The difficulty in finding an appropriate control group for this retrospective study highlights the need for future randomized controlled trials to determine efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"650-655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104709\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104709","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言:众所周知,一小部分但很大比例的患者在手术出院数月后继续使用阿片类药物。我们试图与对照组相比,评估接受过渡疼痛服务的患者出院后阿片类药物的使用情况。方法:我们使用2014年至2018年在加拿大安大略省接受手术的个人的管理数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。匹配的队列配对是通过将过渡期疼痛服务的患者与安大略省其他学术医院的未参加过渡期疼痛治疗的患者进行匹配而创建的。进行分段回归以评估月平均每日阿片类药物剂量的变化。结果:共有209名过渡期疼痛服务患者与209名在其他学术中心接受手术的患者相匹配。在手术后的12个月里,平均每日剂量估计减少了3.53毫克吗啡当量(95% CI 2.67至4.39,p讨论:参加过渡期疼痛服务的患者能够比对照组更快地减少阿片类药物剂量。这项回顾性研究很难找到合适的对照组,这突出了未来需要进行随机对照试验来确定疗效。
Impact of a Transitional Pain Service on postoperative opioid trajectories: a retrospective cohort study.
Introduction: It has been well described that a small but significant proportion of patients continue to use opioids months after surgical discharge. We sought to evaluate postdischarge opioid use of patients who were seen by a Transitional Pain Service compared with controls.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative data of individuals who underwent surgery in Ontario, Canada from 2014 to 2018. Matched cohort pairs were created by matching Transitional Pain Service patients to patients of other academic hospitals in Ontario who were not enrolled in a Transitional Pain Service. Segmented regression was performed to assess changes in monthly mean daily opioid dosage.
Results: A total of 209 Transitional Pain Service patients were matched to 209 patients who underwent surgery at other academic centers. Over the 12 months after surgery, the mean daily dose decreased by an estimated 3.53 morphine milligram equivalents (95% CI 2.67 to 4.39, p<0.001) per month for the Transitional Pain Service group, compared with a decline of only 1.05 morphine milligram equivalents (95% CI 0.43 to 1.66, p<0.001) for the controls. The difference-in-difference change in opioid use for the Transitional Pain Service group versus the control group was -2.48 morphine milligram equivalents per month (95% CI -3.54 to -1.43, p=0.003).
Discussion: Patients enrolled in the Transitional Pain Service were able to achieve opioid dose reduction faster than in the control cohorts. The difficulty in finding an appropriate control group for this retrospective study highlights the need for future randomized controlled trials to determine efficacy.
期刊介绍:
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications.
Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).