泰国版护理者对慢性疾病自我护理的贡献的心理测量学评估

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.09.021
Nuntaporn Klinjun , Jom Suwanno , Kannika Srisomthrong , Juk Suwanno , Matthew Kelly
{"title":"泰国版护理者对慢性疾病自我护理的贡献的心理测量学评估","authors":"Nuntaporn Klinjun ,&nbsp;Jom Suwanno ,&nbsp;Kannika Srisomthrong ,&nbsp;Juk Suwanno ,&nbsp;Matthew Kelly","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.09.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care (CC-SC) of Chronic Illness Inventory version 2 (CC-SC-CII-v2) in stroke caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study following the COSMIN guidelines, evaluating validity and reliability of three separate scales, CC-SC Maintenance, CC-SC Monitoring, and CC-SC Management, as well as overall CC-SC-CII-v2. From September to December 2022, we enrolled 422 stroke caregivers from primary care centers in southern Thailand. Structural validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while concurrent validity was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation <em>r</em> coefficients between CC-SC-CII-v2 and the Caregiver Self-Efficacy in Contributing to Patient Self-Care Scale (CSE-CSC). Internal coherence reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficient, the composite reliability index, and the McDonald’s ω coefficient. Additionally, test-retest reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included mostly middle-aged women who cared for their parent. CFA supported the two-factor structure of the CC-SC Maintenance and Management scales and the one-factor structure of the CC-SC Monitoring scale. A simultaneous CFA on the combined set of items supported the more general model. The concurrent validity of CC-SC-CII-v2 with CSE-CSC was established (<em>r</em> ranging 0.47–0.65, all <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Reliability estimates supported adequate Cronbach’s α coefficient (ranging 0.83–0.89), composite reliability (ranging 0.84–0.85), McDonald’s ω coefficients (ranging 0.83–0.85), and ICCs (ranging 0.86–0.90) across the three scales.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Thai CC-SC-CII-v2 demonstrated strong psychometric properties among stroke caregivers. It can be a valuable instrument to investigate the role of caregivers in contributing to stroke patients’ self-care in diverse cultural contexts like Thailand.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A psychometrics evaluation of the Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory Version 2 in stroke caregivers\",\"authors\":\"Nuntaporn Klinjun ,&nbsp;Jom Suwanno ,&nbsp;Kannika Srisomthrong ,&nbsp;Juk Suwanno ,&nbsp;Matthew Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.09.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care (CC-SC) of Chronic Illness Inventory version 2 (CC-SC-CII-v2) in stroke caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study following the COSMIN guidelines, evaluating validity and reliability of three separate scales, CC-SC Maintenance, CC-SC Monitoring, and CC-SC Management, as well as overall CC-SC-CII-v2. From September to December 2022, we enrolled 422 stroke caregivers from primary care centers in southern Thailand. Structural validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while concurrent validity was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation <em>r</em> coefficients between CC-SC-CII-v2 and the Caregiver Self-Efficacy in Contributing to Patient Self-Care Scale (CSE-CSC). Internal coherence reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficient, the composite reliability index, and the McDonald’s ω coefficient. Additionally, test-retest reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included mostly middle-aged women who cared for their parent. CFA supported the two-factor structure of the CC-SC Maintenance and Management scales and the one-factor structure of the CC-SC Monitoring scale. A simultaneous CFA on the combined set of items supported the more general model. The concurrent validity of CC-SC-CII-v2 with CSE-CSC was established (<em>r</em> ranging 0.47–0.65, all <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Reliability estimates supported adequate Cronbach’s α coefficient (ranging 0.83–0.89), composite reliability (ranging 0.84–0.85), McDonald’s ω coefficients (ranging 0.83–0.85), and ICCs (ranging 0.86–0.90) across the three scales.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Thai CC-SC-CII-v2 demonstrated strong psychometric properties among stroke caregivers. It can be a valuable instrument to investigate the role of caregivers in contributing to stroke patients’ self-care in diverse cultural contexts like Thailand.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001138\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估泰国版慢性病护理人员自我护理贡献量表(CC-SC)第2版(CC-SC-CII-v2)在中风护理人员中的心理测量特征。方法我们根据COSMIN指南进行了一项多中心、横断面研究,评估了三种独立量表的有效性和可靠性,即CC-SC维护、CC-SC监测和CC-SC管理,以及总体CC-SC-CII-v2。2022年9月至12月,我们招募了422名来自泰国南部初级保健中心的中风护理人员。结构有效性通过验证性因素分析(CFA)进行评估,同时有效性使用CC-SC-CII-v2和护理人员对患者自我护理的自我效能量表(CSE-CSC)之间的Pearson相关系数进行评估。内部连贯可靠性使用Cronbachα系数、复合可靠性指数和McDonaldω系数进行评估。此外,用组内相关系数(ICCs)评估重测的可靠性。结果该研究主要包括照顾父母的中年妇女。CFA支持CC-SC维护和管理量表的双因素结构和CC-SC监测量表的单因素结构。对合并项目集同时进行CFA支持更通用的模型。建立了CC-SC-CII-v2与CSE-CSC的同时有效性(r范围为0.47–0.65,均P<;0.001)。在三个量表中,可靠性估计支持适当的Cronbachα系数(范围为0.83–0.89)、复合可靠性(范围为0.85)、McDonaldω系数(范围0.83–0.85)和ICCs(范围0.86–0.90)。结论泰国CC-SC-CII-v2在脑卒中护理人员中表现出较强的心理测量特性。这可能是一个有价值的工具,可以调查照顾者在泰国等不同文化背景下对中风患者自我护理的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A psychometrics evaluation of the Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory Version 2 in stroke caregivers

Objectives

To evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care (CC-SC) of Chronic Illness Inventory version 2 (CC-SC-CII-v2) in stroke caregivers.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study following the COSMIN guidelines, evaluating validity and reliability of three separate scales, CC-SC Maintenance, CC-SC Monitoring, and CC-SC Management, as well as overall CC-SC-CII-v2. From September to December 2022, we enrolled 422 stroke caregivers from primary care centers in southern Thailand. Structural validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while concurrent validity was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation r coefficients between CC-SC-CII-v2 and the Caregiver Self-Efficacy in Contributing to Patient Self-Care Scale (CSE-CSC). Internal coherence reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficient, the composite reliability index, and the McDonald’s ω coefficient. Additionally, test-retest reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results

The study included mostly middle-aged women who cared for their parent. CFA supported the two-factor structure of the CC-SC Maintenance and Management scales and the one-factor structure of the CC-SC Monitoring scale. A simultaneous CFA on the combined set of items supported the more general model. The concurrent validity of CC-SC-CII-v2 with CSE-CSC was established (r ranging 0.47–0.65, all P < 0.001). Reliability estimates supported adequate Cronbach’s α coefficient (ranging 0.83–0.89), composite reliability (ranging 0.84–0.85), McDonald’s ω coefficients (ranging 0.83–0.85), and ICCs (ranging 0.86–0.90) across the three scales.

Conclusions

The Thai CC-SC-CII-v2 demonstrated strong psychometric properties among stroke caregivers. It can be a valuable instrument to investigate the role of caregivers in contributing to stroke patients’ self-care in diverse cultural contexts like Thailand.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
408
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Scanning resources to build an international nursing knowledge network Effectiveness of nurse-led heart failure clinic: A systematic review Reliability and validity of the Italian Version of the Chase Nurse Manager Competencies Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1