食物过敏和不耐受:对肠道刺激的反应由超声监测

Gülen Arslan , Svein Ødegaard , Said Elsayed , Erik Florvaag , Arnold Berstad
{"title":"食物过敏和不耐受:对肠道刺激的反应由超声监测","authors":"Gülen Arslan ,&nbsp;Svein Ødegaard ,&nbsp;Said Elsayed ,&nbsp;Erik Florvaag ,&nbsp;Arnold Berstad","doi":"10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00004-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Objective:</em> Objective assessment of adverse reactions to food is a long-felt want. We report our preliminary experience with a new endosonographic allergen provocation test. <em>Methods:</em> Twenty patients were examined, seven patients having food allergy and 13 having food intolerance. The duodenal mucosa was challenged with allergen extracts via a nasoduodenal tube. The responses were recorded using a miniprobe for endosonography through the tube. Thereafter, intestinal lavage was performed by giving 2 l PEG solution containing 50 μCi <sup>51</sup>CrEDTA. The gut lavage fluid and urine for 5 h were collected. <em>Results:</em> Increased mucosal thickness in response to provocation was recorded in 11 patients, but not more often or pronounced in the allergic than in the intolerance group. Interestingly, increased mucosal thickness associated with a new echogenic layer was seen in two patients and a sustained duodenal contraction, lasting 15–20 min associated with pain, in another two. Intestinal permeability and inflammatory mediators were not significantly different in the two groups. <em>Conclusion:</em> In patients with self-reported adverse reactions to food abnormal responses to duodenal provocation may be recognised by endosonography. However, neither endosonography nor intestinal permeability or faecal calprotectin responses were able to distinguish between food allergy and intolerance. Sustained duodenal contractions in response to food might be a cause of abdominal pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79592,"journal":{"name":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00004-6","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food allergy and intolerance: response to intestinal provocation monitored by endosonography\",\"authors\":\"Gülen Arslan ,&nbsp;Svein Ødegaard ,&nbsp;Said Elsayed ,&nbsp;Erik Florvaag ,&nbsp;Arnold Berstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00004-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Objective:</em> Objective assessment of adverse reactions to food is a long-felt want. We report our preliminary experience with a new endosonographic allergen provocation test. <em>Methods:</em> Twenty patients were examined, seven patients having food allergy and 13 having food intolerance. The duodenal mucosa was challenged with allergen extracts via a nasoduodenal tube. The responses were recorded using a miniprobe for endosonography through the tube. Thereafter, intestinal lavage was performed by giving 2 l PEG solution containing 50 μCi <sup>51</sup>CrEDTA. The gut lavage fluid and urine for 5 h were collected. <em>Results:</em> Increased mucosal thickness in response to provocation was recorded in 11 patients, but not more often or pronounced in the allergic than in the intolerance group. Interestingly, increased mucosal thickness associated with a new echogenic layer was seen in two patients and a sustained duodenal contraction, lasting 15–20 min associated with pain, in another two. Intestinal permeability and inflammatory mediators were not significantly different in the two groups. <em>Conclusion:</em> In patients with self-reported adverse reactions to food abnormal responses to duodenal provocation may be recognised by endosonography. However, neither endosonography nor intestinal permeability or faecal calprotectin responses were able to distinguish between food allergy and intolerance. Sustained duodenal contractions in response to food might be a cause of abdominal pain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 29-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00004-6\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929826602000046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929826602000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

目的:对食物的不良反应进行客观评估是人们长期以来的愿望。我们报告了一种新的内镜过敏原激发试验的初步经验。方法:对20例患者进行检查,其中7例为食物过敏,13例为食物不耐受。通过鼻十二指肠管用过敏原提取物攻击十二指肠粘膜。使用微型探针通过导管进行内窥镜检查,记录反应。然后,通过给予2 l含有50μCi 51CrEDTA的PEG溶液进行肠道灌洗。收集5小时的肠道灌洗液和尿液。结果:11名患者记录到对刺激的粘膜厚度增加,但在过敏组中并不比不耐受组更常见或更明显。有趣的是,在两名患者中发现了与新的回声层相关的粘膜厚度增加,在另外两名患者的十二指肠持续收缩,持续15-20分钟并伴有疼痛。两组的肠道通透性和炎症介质没有显著差异。结论:在自我报告食物不良反应的患者中,十二指肠刺激的异常反应可以通过内镜检查识别。然而,内镜检查、肠道通透性或粪便钙卫蛋白反应都无法区分食物过敏和不耐受。十二指肠对食物的持续收缩可能是腹痛的原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Food allergy and intolerance: response to intestinal provocation monitored by endosonography

Objective: Objective assessment of adverse reactions to food is a long-felt want. We report our preliminary experience with a new endosonographic allergen provocation test. Methods: Twenty patients were examined, seven patients having food allergy and 13 having food intolerance. The duodenal mucosa was challenged with allergen extracts via a nasoduodenal tube. The responses were recorded using a miniprobe for endosonography through the tube. Thereafter, intestinal lavage was performed by giving 2 l PEG solution containing 50 μCi 51CrEDTA. The gut lavage fluid and urine for 5 h were collected. Results: Increased mucosal thickness in response to provocation was recorded in 11 patients, but not more often or pronounced in the allergic than in the intolerance group. Interestingly, increased mucosal thickness associated with a new echogenic layer was seen in two patients and a sustained duodenal contraction, lasting 15–20 min associated with pain, in another two. Intestinal permeability and inflammatory mediators were not significantly different in the two groups. Conclusion: In patients with self-reported adverse reactions to food abnormal responses to duodenal provocation may be recognised by endosonography. However, neither endosonography nor intestinal permeability or faecal calprotectin responses were able to distinguish between food allergy and intolerance. Sustained duodenal contractions in response to food might be a cause of abdominal pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound assessment of the intima and media layers on the carotid arteries in peri- and postmenopausal women Subject Index Author Index Control system analysis of visually evoked blood flow regulation in humans under normocapnia and hypercapnia Effect of hypertension and candesartan on the blood flow velocity of the extraocular vessels in hypertensive patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1