与教师主导的性教育相比,同伴主导的学校性教育方法影响有限

{"title":"与教师主导的性教育相比,同伴主导的学校性教育方法影响有限","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ehbc.2005.03.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Do peer-led sex and relationship education programmes reduce unsafe sex and unwanted pregnancies compared with traditional teacher-led sex education in schools?</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Randomised controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>There were no significant differences between intervention and control schools in the proportion of pupils reporting unprotected first heterosexual intercourse by 16 years of age (difference in cumulative proportion: −0.8%, 95% CI −3.5 to 1.8; <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.53</mn></mrow></math></span>). At 18 months follow up, peer-led education improved pupils’ satisfaction with their sex education compared with teacher-led education (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math></span>). Peer-led education non-significantly reduced unwanted pregnancies (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.07</mn></mrow></math></span>). Following intervention, girls were less likely to report having had sexual intercourse by 16 years (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.0008</mn></mrow></math></span>), although the difference was not significant for boys (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.35</mn></mrow></math></span>) (see results table).</p></div><div><h3>Authors’ conclusions</h3><p>Peer-led sex education in schools only modestly improved sexual behaviour. Young people report that they learn most about sex outside school. Wider strategies of education such as media and service delivery need to be assessed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100513,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based Healthcare and Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehbc.2005.03.022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer-led approach to sex education in school has limited impact compared with teacher-led education\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ehbc.2005.03.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Do peer-led sex and relationship education programmes reduce unsafe sex and unwanted pregnancies compared with traditional teacher-led sex education in schools?</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Randomised controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>There were no significant differences between intervention and control schools in the proportion of pupils reporting unprotected first heterosexual intercourse by 16 years of age (difference in cumulative proportion: −0.8%, 95% CI −3.5 to 1.8; <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.53</mn></mrow></math></span>). At 18 months follow up, peer-led education improved pupils’ satisfaction with their sex education compared with teacher-led education (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math></span>). Peer-led education non-significantly reduced unwanted pregnancies (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.07</mn></mrow></math></span>). Following intervention, girls were less likely to report having had sexual intercourse by 16 years (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.0008</mn></mrow></math></span>), although the difference was not significant for boys (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.35</mn></mrow></math></span>) (see results table).</p></div><div><h3>Authors’ conclusions</h3><p>Peer-led sex education in schools only modestly improved sexual behaviour. Young people report that they learn most about sex outside school. Wider strategies of education such as media and service delivery need to be assessed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based Healthcare and Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehbc.2005.03.022\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based Healthcare and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744224905000768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based Healthcare and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744224905000768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题与传统的教师主导的学校性教育相比,同伴主导的性教育和关系教育计划是否减少了不安全的性行为和意外怀孕?研究设计随机对照试验。主要结果干预学校和对照学校报告16岁前无保护的首次异性性交的学生比例没有显著差异(累积比例差异:-0.8%,95%CI−3.5-1.8;p=0.53),与教师主导的教育相比,同伴主导的教育提高了学生对性教育的满意度(p=0.001)。同伴主导的教学没有显著减少意外怀孕(p=0.07)。干预后,女孩在16岁时报告性交的可能性较小(p=0.0008),尽管男孩的差异并不显著(p=0.035)(见结果表)。作者的结论同伴主导的学校性教育只是适度地改善了性行为。年轻人报告说,他们在校外学到的关于性的知识最多。需要评估更广泛的教育战略,如媒体和提供服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peer-led approach to sex education in school has limited impact compared with teacher-led education

Question

Do peer-led sex and relationship education programmes reduce unsafe sex and unwanted pregnancies compared with traditional teacher-led sex education in schools?

Study design

Randomised controlled trial.

Main results

There were no significant differences between intervention and control schools in the proportion of pupils reporting unprotected first heterosexual intercourse by 16 years of age (difference in cumulative proportion: −0.8%, 95% CI −3.5 to 1.8; p=0.53). At 18 months follow up, peer-led education improved pupils’ satisfaction with their sex education compared with teacher-led education (p=0.001). Peer-led education non-significantly reduced unwanted pregnancies (p=0.07). Following intervention, girls were less likely to report having had sexual intercourse by 16 years (p=0.0008), although the difference was not significant for boys (p=0.35) (see results table).

Authors’ conclusions

Peer-led sex education in schools only modestly improved sexual behaviour. Young people report that they learn most about sex outside school. Wider strategies of education such as media and service delivery need to be assessed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge management Health services for health promotion and disease prevention Healthcare public health in disasters and emergencies Perspectives on healthcare quality and safety Healthcare redesign and population health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1