{"title":"介绍eNoC -一个简单的,基于excel的工具,用于改进对混合物的贡献者数量(NoC)的分配","authors":"Jim Thomson, David Moore, Tim Clayton","doi":"10.1016/j.fsigss.2022.09.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assigning NoC in a mixed STR profile is an important preliminary step in computing a likelihood ratio (LR). A common metric is maximum allele count (MAC) whereby the locus exhibiting the largest number of alleles is used to set the NOC. This metric can be supplemented by considering total allele count (TAC) and locus allele count (LAC). TAC is the total number of alleles across all loci and is compared with probability distributions generated <em>in silico</em>. LAC works similarly, save that the probability distributions are generated at the locus level. Herein, we present a comparative analysis of these three metrics using a dataset of 10,000 of each of 2–7 person simulated ground truth mixtures. These datasets were used to generate parameter distributions for each NoC. This analysis showed LAC to be the most accurate single metric in all circumstances tested. We have developmentally validated an excel-based tool to automate calculations for use by operational caseworkers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56262,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 42-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176822000166/pdfft?md5=f5583095331ee6f80a07ca1222804fba&pid=1-s2.0-S1875176822000166-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introducing eNoC – A simple, excel-based tool for improved assignment of the number of contributors (NoC) to a mixture\",\"authors\":\"Jim Thomson, David Moore, Tim Clayton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsigss.2022.09.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Assigning NoC in a mixed STR profile is an important preliminary step in computing a likelihood ratio (LR). A common metric is maximum allele count (MAC) whereby the locus exhibiting the largest number of alleles is used to set the NOC. This metric can be supplemented by considering total allele count (TAC) and locus allele count (LAC). TAC is the total number of alleles across all loci and is compared with probability distributions generated <em>in silico</em>. LAC works similarly, save that the probability distributions are generated at the locus level. Herein, we present a comparative analysis of these three metrics using a dataset of 10,000 of each of 2–7 person simulated ground truth mixtures. These datasets were used to generate parameter distributions for each NoC. This analysis showed LAC to be the most accurate single metric in all circumstances tested. We have developmentally validated an excel-based tool to automate calculations for use by operational caseworkers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 42-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176822000166/pdfft?md5=f5583095331ee6f80a07ca1222804fba&pid=1-s2.0-S1875176822000166-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176822000166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176822000166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Introducing eNoC – A simple, excel-based tool for improved assignment of the number of contributors (NoC) to a mixture
Assigning NoC in a mixed STR profile is an important preliminary step in computing a likelihood ratio (LR). A common metric is maximum allele count (MAC) whereby the locus exhibiting the largest number of alleles is used to set the NOC. This metric can be supplemented by considering total allele count (TAC) and locus allele count (LAC). TAC is the total number of alleles across all loci and is compared with probability distributions generated in silico. LAC works similarly, save that the probability distributions are generated at the locus level. Herein, we present a comparative analysis of these three metrics using a dataset of 10,000 of each of 2–7 person simulated ground truth mixtures. These datasets were used to generate parameter distributions for each NoC. This analysis showed LAC to be the most accurate single metric in all circumstances tested. We have developmentally validated an excel-based tool to automate calculations for use by operational caseworkers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Forensic Science International Genetics Supplement Series is the perfect publication vehicle for the proceedings of a scientific symposium, commissioned thematic issues, or for disseminating a selection of invited articles. The Forensic Science International Genetics Supplement Series is part of a duo of publications on forensic genetics, published by Elsevier on behalf of the International Society for Forensic Genetics.