常染色体和X-STRs多步突变被认为是单步突变的频率有多高?

Sofia Antão-Sousa , Eduardo Conde-Sousa , Leonor Gusmão , António Amorim , Nádia Pinto
{"title":"常染色体和X-STRs多步突变被认为是单步突变的频率有多高?","authors":"Sofia Antão-Sousa ,&nbsp;Eduardo Conde-Sousa ,&nbsp;Leonor Gusmão ,&nbsp;António Amorim ,&nbsp;Nádia Pinto","doi":"10.1016/j.fsigss.2022.10.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Short tandem repeats (STRs) incur in length mutations that involve the loss or gain of repeats. STR mutation rates are usually estimated considering the rates of observed Mendelian incompatibilities in one generation familial configurations. When considering multistep mutations, for the autosomal and X-chromosomal modes of genetic transmission, underestimations are inevitable when using this approach (MIA), due to the occurrence of mutational events deceptively perceived as involving fewer steps. The rate of this occurrence depends on the mode of genetic transmission considered, the parental origin of the mutation, the type of familial configuration considered, and the genotypic background of the progenitor(s). MIA biases were weighted and compared for the diploid and haplodiploid modes of transmission, using familial genotypic configurations (parent(s)-child duos and trios) generated resorting to Python™ and real population databases from Norway, Somalia, and Spain for 10 Aut-STRs and Argentina, Eastern Asia, and Northern Europe for 12 X-STRs. One two- or one three-step mutation was simulated in each of the 1,000,000 familial configurations. The frequency with which mutations could be interpreted as involving fewer steps, when the most parsimonious reasoning is employed, was computed. Results showed that the magnitude and type of biases depend on the type of familial data and the genetic mode of transmission considered, being higher in duos than in trios, both in autosomes and the X chromosome. Indeed, whether X- or Aut-STRs are analyzed, trios generally provide better estimates and should be favored over duos. The pooling of the two types of data is not advised. The greater the number of steps involved in the mutation, the worst the estimates obtained. In X-chromosomal analyzes, trios with a paternal mutation presented the best estimates and mother-daughter duos the worst; mother-son duos showed similar estimates to trios when a maternal mutation was considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56262,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 165-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176822000658/pdfft?md5=326ae466e5ae64ed54632d7c64fea88a&pid=1-s2.0-S1875176822000658-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How frequently are Autosomal and X-STRs multistep mutations perceived as single-step?\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Antão-Sousa ,&nbsp;Eduardo Conde-Sousa ,&nbsp;Leonor Gusmão ,&nbsp;António Amorim ,&nbsp;Nádia Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsigss.2022.10.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Short tandem repeats (STRs) incur in length mutations that involve the loss or gain of repeats. STR mutation rates are usually estimated considering the rates of observed Mendelian incompatibilities in one generation familial configurations. When considering multistep mutations, for the autosomal and X-chromosomal modes of genetic transmission, underestimations are inevitable when using this approach (MIA), due to the occurrence of mutational events deceptively perceived as involving fewer steps. The rate of this occurrence depends on the mode of genetic transmission considered, the parental origin of the mutation, the type of familial configuration considered, and the genotypic background of the progenitor(s). MIA biases were weighted and compared for the diploid and haplodiploid modes of transmission, using familial genotypic configurations (parent(s)-child duos and trios) generated resorting to Python™ and real population databases from Norway, Somalia, and Spain for 10 Aut-STRs and Argentina, Eastern Asia, and Northern Europe for 12 X-STRs. One two- or one three-step mutation was simulated in each of the 1,000,000 familial configurations. The frequency with which mutations could be interpreted as involving fewer steps, when the most parsimonious reasoning is employed, was computed. Results showed that the magnitude and type of biases depend on the type of familial data and the genetic mode of transmission considered, being higher in duos than in trios, both in autosomes and the X chromosome. Indeed, whether X- or Aut-STRs are analyzed, trios generally provide better estimates and should be favored over duos. The pooling of the two types of data is not advised. The greater the number of steps involved in the mutation, the worst the estimates obtained. In X-chromosomal analyzes, trios with a paternal mutation presented the best estimates and mother-daughter duos the worst; mother-son duos showed similar estimates to trios when a maternal mutation was considered.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 165-166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176822000658/pdfft?md5=326ae466e5ae64ed54632d7c64fea88a&pid=1-s2.0-S1875176822000658-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176822000658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176822000658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

短串联重复序列(STR)引起长度突变,涉及重复序列的丢失或获得。STR突变率通常是根据在一代家族结构中观察到的孟德尔不相容性的比率来估计的。当考虑多步突变时,对于常染色体和X染色体遗传传播模式,在使用这种方法(MIA)时,由于突变事件的发生被欺骗性地认为涉及较少的步骤,因此低估是不可避免的。这种发生率取决于所考虑的遗传传播模式、突变的父母来源、所考虑的家族结构类型以及祖细胞的基因型背景。使用Python生成的家族基因型配置(父母-子女二组和三组),对二倍体和单倍体传播模式的MIA偏差进行加权和比较™ 以及来自挪威、索马里和西班牙的10个Aut STR的真实人口数据库,以及阿根廷、东亚和北欧的12个X-STR的实际人口数据库。在1000000个家族结构中,每一个都模拟了一个两步或一个三步突变。当采用最简约的推理时,突变可以被解释为涉及较少步骤的频率被计算出来。结果表明,偏差的大小和类型取决于所考虑的家族数据类型和遗传传播模式,在常染色体和X染色体中,双染色体组的偏差高于三染色体组。事实上,无论是分析X或Aut STR,三人组通常都能提供更好的估计,应该比二人组更受青睐。不建议将这两种类型的数据合并。突变涉及的步骤越多,得到的估计值就越差。在X染色体分析中,父系突变的三胞胎的估计值最好,母女二胞胎的预测值最差;当考虑到母体突变时,母子二人组显示出与三人组相似的估计值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How frequently are Autosomal and X-STRs multistep mutations perceived as single-step?

Short tandem repeats (STRs) incur in length mutations that involve the loss or gain of repeats. STR mutation rates are usually estimated considering the rates of observed Mendelian incompatibilities in one generation familial configurations. When considering multistep mutations, for the autosomal and X-chromosomal modes of genetic transmission, underestimations are inevitable when using this approach (MIA), due to the occurrence of mutational events deceptively perceived as involving fewer steps. The rate of this occurrence depends on the mode of genetic transmission considered, the parental origin of the mutation, the type of familial configuration considered, and the genotypic background of the progenitor(s). MIA biases were weighted and compared for the diploid and haplodiploid modes of transmission, using familial genotypic configurations (parent(s)-child duos and trios) generated resorting to Python™ and real population databases from Norway, Somalia, and Spain for 10 Aut-STRs and Argentina, Eastern Asia, and Northern Europe for 12 X-STRs. One two- or one three-step mutation was simulated in each of the 1,000,000 familial configurations. The frequency with which mutations could be interpreted as involving fewer steps, when the most parsimonious reasoning is employed, was computed. Results showed that the magnitude and type of biases depend on the type of familial data and the genetic mode of transmission considered, being higher in duos than in trios, both in autosomes and the X chromosome. Indeed, whether X- or Aut-STRs are analyzed, trios generally provide better estimates and should be favored over duos. The pooling of the two types of data is not advised. The greater the number of steps involved in the mutation, the worst the estimates obtained. In X-chromosomal analyzes, trios with a paternal mutation presented the best estimates and mother-daughter duos the worst; mother-son duos showed similar estimates to trios when a maternal mutation was considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series
Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
122
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic Science International Genetics Supplement Series is the perfect publication vehicle for the proceedings of a scientific symposium, commissioned thematic issues, or for disseminating a selection of invited articles. The Forensic Science International Genetics Supplement Series is part of a duo of publications on forensic genetics, published by Elsevier on behalf of the International Society for Forensic Genetics.
期刊最新文献
The collapse of an Italian cemetery into the sea: Forensic approach to human remains identification Examination of pretreatment methods for DNA extraction from nails Evaluating probabilistic genotyping for low-pass DNA sequencing The ForAPP: Forensic Ancestry Prediction Pipeline for the interpretation of ancestry informative markers Whole-genome sequencing of degraded DNA for investigative genetic genealogy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1