{"title":"低DNA浓度下的概率SNP基因分型","authors":"M.B. Nielsen , M.M. Andersen , P.S. Eriksen , H.S. Mogensen , N. Morling","doi":"10.1016/j.fsigss.2022.10.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present a statistical method for biallelic SNP genotyping that reduces the risk of wrong SNP calls and gives fewer no-calls. The method uses a symmetric multinomial logistic regression model with an intuitive graphical interpretation. Its probabilistic nature gives the user control over the accepted risk through the estimated genotype probabilities. We compared the performance of our method with the HID SNP Genotyper v.4.3.1 plug-in (HSG) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the additional criteria of the University of Copenhagen (UCPH) through a series of six DNA dilutions from 500 pg to 16 pg DNA. The HSG method made wrong calls from 62.5 pg DNA and below, while the UCPH method made wrong calls at 16 pg DNA. Our method allowed SNP genotyping of 16 pg DNA without making wrong calls. Depending on the DNA dilution, our method also reduced the number of no-calls by 70–96 % compared to UCPH method and 59–69 % compared to the HSG method. Our method can be used for any biallelic genotyping.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56262,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 151-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176822000531/pdfft?md5=0948fa2867aaf0a0ea2e3ee33bc6866d&pid=1-s2.0-S1875176822000531-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic SNP genotyping at low DNA concentrations\",\"authors\":\"M.B. Nielsen , M.M. Andersen , P.S. Eriksen , H.S. Mogensen , N. Morling\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsigss.2022.10.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We present a statistical method for biallelic SNP genotyping that reduces the risk of wrong SNP calls and gives fewer no-calls. The method uses a symmetric multinomial logistic regression model with an intuitive graphical interpretation. Its probabilistic nature gives the user control over the accepted risk through the estimated genotype probabilities. We compared the performance of our method with the HID SNP Genotyper v.4.3.1 plug-in (HSG) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the additional criteria of the University of Copenhagen (UCPH) through a series of six DNA dilutions from 500 pg to 16 pg DNA. The HSG method made wrong calls from 62.5 pg DNA and below, while the UCPH method made wrong calls at 16 pg DNA. Our method allowed SNP genotyping of 16 pg DNA without making wrong calls. Depending on the DNA dilution, our method also reduced the number of no-calls by 70–96 % compared to UCPH method and 59–69 % compared to the HSG method. Our method can be used for any biallelic genotyping.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 151-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176822000531/pdfft?md5=0948fa2867aaf0a0ea2e3ee33bc6866d&pid=1-s2.0-S1875176822000531-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176822000531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176822000531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
我们提出了一种双等位基因SNP基因分型的统计方法,该方法降低了错误SNP调用的风险,并减少了无调用的次数。该方法使用具有直观图形解释的对称多项式逻辑回归模型。它的概率性质使用户能够通过估计的基因型概率来控制可接受的风险。我们将我们的方法的性能与HID SNP Genotyper v.4.3.1插件(HSG)(赛默飞世尔科学公司)和哥本哈根大学(UCPH)的附加标准进行了比较,通过从500pg到16pg的一系列六种DNA稀释。HSG方法从62.5 pg及以下的DNA中发出错误的调用,而UCPH方法在16 pg DNA中发出了错误的调用。我们的方法允许对16pg DNA进行SNP基因分型,而不会做出错误的判断。根据DNA稀释度,与UCPH方法相比,我们的方法还将无呼叫次数减少了70-96%,与HSG方法相比,减少了59-69%。我们的方法可用于任何双等位基因分型。
Probabilistic SNP genotyping at low DNA concentrations
We present a statistical method for biallelic SNP genotyping that reduces the risk of wrong SNP calls and gives fewer no-calls. The method uses a symmetric multinomial logistic regression model with an intuitive graphical interpretation. Its probabilistic nature gives the user control over the accepted risk through the estimated genotype probabilities. We compared the performance of our method with the HID SNP Genotyper v.4.3.1 plug-in (HSG) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the additional criteria of the University of Copenhagen (UCPH) through a series of six DNA dilutions from 500 pg to 16 pg DNA. The HSG method made wrong calls from 62.5 pg DNA and below, while the UCPH method made wrong calls at 16 pg DNA. Our method allowed SNP genotyping of 16 pg DNA without making wrong calls. Depending on the DNA dilution, our method also reduced the number of no-calls by 70–96 % compared to UCPH method and 59–69 % compared to the HSG method. Our method can be used for any biallelic genotyping.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Forensic Science International Genetics Supplement Series is the perfect publication vehicle for the proceedings of a scientific symposium, commissioned thematic issues, or for disseminating a selection of invited articles. The Forensic Science International Genetics Supplement Series is part of a duo of publications on forensic genetics, published by Elsevier on behalf of the International Society for Forensic Genetics.