2006-2016年墨西哥在Seguro普及下的宫颈癌症治疗差距。

Health systems and reform Pub Date : 2023-12-31 Epub Date: 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1080/23288604.2023.2272371
Sean P McClellan, Karla Unger-Saldaña, Priscilla Espinosa-Tamez, Erick Suazo-Zepeda, Michael B Potter, Salim Abraham Barquet-Muñoz, Leticia Torres-Ibarra, Hector Lamadrid-Figueroa, Martín Lajous
{"title":"2006-2016年墨西哥在Seguro普及下的宫颈癌症治疗差距。","authors":"Sean P McClellan, Karla Unger-Saldaña, Priscilla Espinosa-Tamez, Erick Suazo-Zepeda, Michael B Potter, Salim Abraham Barquet-Muñoz, Leticia Torres-Ibarra, Hector Lamadrid-Figueroa, Martín Lajous","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2023.2272371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From 2005 to 2019, the Mexican government financed cervical cancer treatment for individuals without social security insurance through <i>Seguro Popular</i>'s Fund for Protection against Catastrophic Health Expenses. To better understand the impact of this program on access to treatment, we estimated the cervical cancer treatment gap (the proportion of patients with cervical cancer in this population who did not receive treatment). To calculate the expected number of incident cervical cancer cases we used national surveys with information on insurance affiliation and incidence estimates from the Global Burden of Disease study. We used a national claims database to determine the number of cases whose treatment was financed by <i>Seguro Popular</i>. From 2006 to 2016, the national cervical cancer treatment gap changed from 0.61 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.62) to 0.45 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.48), with an average yearly reduction of -0.012 (95% CI -0.024 to -0.001). The gap was greater in states with higher levels of marginalization and in the youngest and oldest age groups. Although the cervical cancer treatment gap among individuals eligible for <i>Seguro Popular</i> decreased after the introduction of public financing for treatment, it remained high. <i>Seguro Popular</i> was eliminated in 2019; however, individuals without social security have continued to receive cancer care financed by the government in the same healthcare facilities. These results suggest that barriers to care persisted after the introduction of public financing for treatment. These barriers must be reduced to improve cervical cancer care in Mexico, particularly in states with high levels of marginalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":73218,"journal":{"name":"Health systems and reform","volume":"9 1","pages":"2272371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cervical Cancer Treatment Gap in Mexico Under <i>Seguro Popular</i>, 2006-2016.\",\"authors\":\"Sean P McClellan, Karla Unger-Saldaña, Priscilla Espinosa-Tamez, Erick Suazo-Zepeda, Michael B Potter, Salim Abraham Barquet-Muñoz, Leticia Torres-Ibarra, Hector Lamadrid-Figueroa, Martín Lajous\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23288604.2023.2272371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>From 2005 to 2019, the Mexican government financed cervical cancer treatment for individuals without social security insurance through <i>Seguro Popular</i>'s Fund for Protection against Catastrophic Health Expenses. To better understand the impact of this program on access to treatment, we estimated the cervical cancer treatment gap (the proportion of patients with cervical cancer in this population who did not receive treatment). To calculate the expected number of incident cervical cancer cases we used national surveys with information on insurance affiliation and incidence estimates from the Global Burden of Disease study. We used a national claims database to determine the number of cases whose treatment was financed by <i>Seguro Popular</i>. From 2006 to 2016, the national cervical cancer treatment gap changed from 0.61 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.62) to 0.45 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.48), with an average yearly reduction of -0.012 (95% CI -0.024 to -0.001). The gap was greater in states with higher levels of marginalization and in the youngest and oldest age groups. Although the cervical cancer treatment gap among individuals eligible for <i>Seguro Popular</i> decreased after the introduction of public financing for treatment, it remained high. <i>Seguro Popular</i> was eliminated in 2019; however, individuals without social security have continued to receive cancer care financed by the government in the same healthcare facilities. These results suggest that barriers to care persisted after the introduction of public financing for treatment. These barriers must be reduced to improve cervical cancer care in Mexico, particularly in states with high levels of marginalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health systems and reform\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"2272371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health systems and reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2023.2272371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems and reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2023.2272371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2005年至2019年,墨西哥政府通过Seguro Popular的灾难性健康费用保护基金为没有社会保障保险的个人提供宫颈癌症治疗资金。为了更好地了解该计划对获得治疗的影响,我们估计了癌症治疗差距(该人群中未接受治疗的癌症宫颈癌患者的比例)。为了计算预期的宫颈癌症病例数,我们使用了全国性调查,其中包括全球疾病负担研究的保险关系和发病率估计信息。我们使用国家索赔数据库来确定Seguro Popular资助治疗的病例数量。2006年至2016年,全国癌症治疗差距从0.61(95%CI 0.59至0.62)变为0.45(95%CI 0.43至0.48),平均每年减少-0.012(95%CI-0.024至-0.001)。边缘化程度较高的州以及最年轻和最年长的年龄组的差距更大。尽管在引入公共治疗资金后,符合Seguro Popular条件的个人之间的癌症治疗差距有所缩小,但仍然很高。Seguro Popular在2019年被淘汰;然而,没有社会保障的个人继续在同一医疗机构接受由政府资助的癌症治疗。这些结果表明,在引入治疗公共融资后,护理障碍依然存在。必须减少这些障碍,以改善墨西哥的癌症治疗,特别是在边缘化程度高的州。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Cervical Cancer Treatment Gap in Mexico Under Seguro Popular, 2006-2016.

From 2005 to 2019, the Mexican government financed cervical cancer treatment for individuals without social security insurance through Seguro Popular's Fund for Protection against Catastrophic Health Expenses. To better understand the impact of this program on access to treatment, we estimated the cervical cancer treatment gap (the proportion of patients with cervical cancer in this population who did not receive treatment). To calculate the expected number of incident cervical cancer cases we used national surveys with information on insurance affiliation and incidence estimates from the Global Burden of Disease study. We used a national claims database to determine the number of cases whose treatment was financed by Seguro Popular. From 2006 to 2016, the national cervical cancer treatment gap changed from 0.61 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.62) to 0.45 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.48), with an average yearly reduction of -0.012 (95% CI -0.024 to -0.001). The gap was greater in states with higher levels of marginalization and in the youngest and oldest age groups. Although the cervical cancer treatment gap among individuals eligible for Seguro Popular decreased after the introduction of public financing for treatment, it remained high. Seguro Popular was eliminated in 2019; however, individuals without social security have continued to receive cancer care financed by the government in the same healthcare facilities. These results suggest that barriers to care persisted after the introduction of public financing for treatment. These barriers must be reduced to improve cervical cancer care in Mexico, particularly in states with high levels of marginalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Public Financial Management Save Life? Evidence from a Quantitative Review of PFM and Health Outcomes in Sub-Saharan African Countries. COVID-19 Deaths in Long-Term Care Facilities in the US: An Urgent Call for Equitable and Integrated Health Systems and an All-Hazards Approach to the Next Crisis. Resilience of Primary Health Care in Ukraine: Challenges of the Pandemic and War. The Impact of Centralized Procurement on Treatment Patterns for Myocardial Infarction and More Principled Utilization of Coronary Stents. Data Integration of Health Financing Systems as a Critical Enabler for Objective-Oriented Health System Reform: A Scoping Review from India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1