评估美国俄亥俄州自行车路线服务和改进机会的调查工具

Kailai Wang , Gulsah Akar , Long Cheng , Kevin Lee , Meredyth Sanders
{"title":"评估美国俄亥俄州自行车路线服务和改进机会的调查工具","authors":"Kailai Wang ,&nbsp;Gulsah Akar ,&nbsp;Long Cheng ,&nbsp;Kevin Lee ,&nbsp;Meredyth Sanders","doi":"10.1016/j.multra.2022.100040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the past two decades, transportation engineers and urban planners have become increasingly interested in using performance measures to capture roadway infrastructure effects on bicyclists' comfort levels. In this study, a tool is developed for evaluating Ohio's local roads and identifying opportunities for improvement. This begins by assessing the available data sources required to develop a customized model for Ohio, United States. Stakeholder interviews and data assessment outcomes indicate that most local jurisdictions do not have access to all relevant data for a complete bicycle level of traffic stress (LTS) analysis. Therefore, we extend the original bicycle LTS framework by formulating effective methods to deal with missing data. The designed methods are based on Ohio's functional classification system, and existing data on speed limits, traffic volumes, and bicycle facility widths. Our approach enables agencies to conduct bicycle LTS analysis when critical data elements are missing (such as posted speed limits, traffic volumes, and bicycle facility widths). For example, compared to the assignments with completed Mid-Ohio region data, the proposed approach reaches a 90% match in bicycle LTS score assignments in urban areas when road traffic volumes are missing. Local communities in Ohio and beyond can adopt the proposed approach to achieve interim and temporary results when collecting accurate data is not feasible due to time and cost considerations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100933,"journal":{"name":"Multimodal Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586322000405/pdfft?md5=4a56d01426f18b297e35a6a055893895&pid=1-s2.0-S2772586322000405-main.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating tools for evaluating service and improvement opportunities on bicycle routes in Ohio, United States\",\"authors\":\"Kailai Wang ,&nbsp;Gulsah Akar ,&nbsp;Long Cheng ,&nbsp;Kevin Lee ,&nbsp;Meredyth Sanders\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.multra.2022.100040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Over the past two decades, transportation engineers and urban planners have become increasingly interested in using performance measures to capture roadway infrastructure effects on bicyclists' comfort levels. In this study, a tool is developed for evaluating Ohio's local roads and identifying opportunities for improvement. This begins by assessing the available data sources required to develop a customized model for Ohio, United States. Stakeholder interviews and data assessment outcomes indicate that most local jurisdictions do not have access to all relevant data for a complete bicycle level of traffic stress (LTS) analysis. Therefore, we extend the original bicycle LTS framework by formulating effective methods to deal with missing data. The designed methods are based on Ohio's functional classification system, and existing data on speed limits, traffic volumes, and bicycle facility widths. Our approach enables agencies to conduct bicycle LTS analysis when critical data elements are missing (such as posted speed limits, traffic volumes, and bicycle facility widths). For example, compared to the assignments with completed Mid-Ohio region data, the proposed approach reaches a 90% match in bicycle LTS score assignments in urban areas when road traffic volumes are missing. Local communities in Ohio and beyond can adopt the proposed approach to achieve interim and temporary results when collecting accurate data is not feasible due to time and cost considerations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multimodal Transportation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586322000405/pdfft?md5=4a56d01426f18b297e35a6a055893895&pid=1-s2.0-S2772586322000405-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multimodal Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586322000405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodal Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586322000405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

在过去的二十年里,交通工程师和城市规划者对使用性能指标来捕捉道路基础设施对骑自行车者舒适度的影响越来越感兴趣。在这项研究中,开发了一种工具来评估俄亥俄州的地方道路,并确定改进的机会。这首先要评估为美国俄亥俄州开发定制模型所需的可用数据源。利益相关者访谈和数据评估结果表明,大多数地方司法管辖区无法获得完整的自行车交通压力水平(LTS)分析的所有相关数据。因此,我们通过制定有效的方法来处理缺失的数据,扩展了原来的自行车LTS框架。设计的方法基于俄亥俄州的功能分类系统,以及关于限速、交通量和自行车设施宽度的现有数据。当关键数据元素(如公布的限速、交通量和自行车设施宽度)缺失时,我们的方法使机构能够进行自行车LTS分析。例如,与已完成俄亥俄州中部地区数据的分配相比,当道路交通量缺失时,所提出的方法在城市地区的自行车LTS分数分配中达到90%的匹配。俄亥俄州及其他地区的当地社区可以在由于时间和成本考虑而无法收集准确数据的情况下,采用拟议的方法来获得临时和临时结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating tools for evaluating service and improvement opportunities on bicycle routes in Ohio, United States

Over the past two decades, transportation engineers and urban planners have become increasingly interested in using performance measures to capture roadway infrastructure effects on bicyclists' comfort levels. In this study, a tool is developed for evaluating Ohio's local roads and identifying opportunities for improvement. This begins by assessing the available data sources required to develop a customized model for Ohio, United States. Stakeholder interviews and data assessment outcomes indicate that most local jurisdictions do not have access to all relevant data for a complete bicycle level of traffic stress (LTS) analysis. Therefore, we extend the original bicycle LTS framework by formulating effective methods to deal with missing data. The designed methods are based on Ohio's functional classification system, and existing data on speed limits, traffic volumes, and bicycle facility widths. Our approach enables agencies to conduct bicycle LTS analysis when critical data elements are missing (such as posted speed limits, traffic volumes, and bicycle facility widths). For example, compared to the assignments with completed Mid-Ohio region data, the proposed approach reaches a 90% match in bicycle LTS score assignments in urban areas when road traffic volumes are missing. Local communities in Ohio and beyond can adopt the proposed approach to achieve interim and temporary results when collecting accurate data is not feasible due to time and cost considerations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between urban traffic crashes and temporal/meteorological conditions: understanding and predicting the effects An assignment-based decomposition approach for the vehicle routing problem with backhauls An adapted savings algorithm for planning heterogeneous logistics with uncrewed aerial vehicles Catastrophic causes of truck drivers’ crashes on Brazilian highways: Mixed method analyses and crash prediction using machine learning Reinforcement learning in transportation research: Frontiers and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1