使用塑料地质蜂窝模块作为天然草皮根区的替代砾石层

Thomas Young, Ruth Mann, Christian Spring
{"title":"使用塑料地质蜂窝模块作为天然草皮根区的替代砾石层","authors":"Thomas Young,&nbsp;Ruth Mann,&nbsp;Christian Spring","doi":"10.1002/its2.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A trial was conducted to assess the suitability of a novel plastic geocellular drainage layer (Permavoid) as a replacement for a conventional gravel layer in a high-quality sports pitch. The trial was conducted during the 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 United Kingdom football (soccer) seasons. Perennial ryegrass (<i>Lolium perenne</i> L.) was grown under five different rootzone depth treatments (50, 100, 200, and 300 mm over Permavoid and 300 mm over gravel as a control representing current practices). These were repeated for two contrasting rootzone types. The trial area was subjected to artificial football-style wear throughout each playing season, with irrigation and nutritional inputs as would be normal for a high-quality football pitch. Infiltration rates, rootzone moisture content, turf cover and tractional strength for the 200- to 300-mm rootzone over Permavoid and 300 mm over gravel were the same throughout the trial. The replacement of the gravel drainage layer with Permavoid had no negative effect on the rootzone's hydraulic characteristics or turfgrass growth over the 2-yr study period. In addition, it may be possible to use shallower rootzone depths in some circumstances, reducing the volume of material needed for construction. Shallower rootzones (50–100 mm) experienced greater fluctuations in rootzone moisture content, which was likely to be directly related to rootzone depth. Rootzone type had a minor effect, with finer rootzones holding onto more moisture and allowing slightly stronger turf. Therefore, when managing shallower and/or coarser rootzones, maintenance programs need to reflect the moisture and nutrient retention characteristics of these growing media.</p>","PeriodicalId":100722,"journal":{"name":"International Turfgrass Society Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/its2.99","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of plastic geocellular modules as a replacement gravel layer for natural turf rootzones\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Young,&nbsp;Ruth Mann,&nbsp;Christian Spring\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/its2.99\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A trial was conducted to assess the suitability of a novel plastic geocellular drainage layer (Permavoid) as a replacement for a conventional gravel layer in a high-quality sports pitch. The trial was conducted during the 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 United Kingdom football (soccer) seasons. Perennial ryegrass (<i>Lolium perenne</i> L.) was grown under five different rootzone depth treatments (50, 100, 200, and 300 mm over Permavoid and 300 mm over gravel as a control representing current practices). These were repeated for two contrasting rootzone types. The trial area was subjected to artificial football-style wear throughout each playing season, with irrigation and nutritional inputs as would be normal for a high-quality football pitch. Infiltration rates, rootzone moisture content, turf cover and tractional strength for the 200- to 300-mm rootzone over Permavoid and 300 mm over gravel were the same throughout the trial. The replacement of the gravel drainage layer with Permavoid had no negative effect on the rootzone's hydraulic characteristics or turfgrass growth over the 2-yr study period. In addition, it may be possible to use shallower rootzone depths in some circumstances, reducing the volume of material needed for construction. Shallower rootzones (50–100 mm) experienced greater fluctuations in rootzone moisture content, which was likely to be directly related to rootzone depth. Rootzone type had a minor effect, with finer rootzones holding onto more moisture and allowing slightly stronger turf. Therefore, when managing shallower and/or coarser rootzones, maintenance programs need to reflect the moisture and nutrient retention characteristics of these growing media.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Turfgrass Society Research Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/its2.99\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Turfgrass Society Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/its2.99\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Turfgrass Society Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/its2.99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进行了一项试验,以评估新型塑料地质蜂窝排水层(Permavide)在高质量运动场中替代传统砾石层的适用性。该试验在2014-2015年和2015-2016年英国足球赛季期间进行。多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne L.)在五种不同的根区深度处理下生长(代表当前实践的对照,在Permavide上50、100、200和300 mm,在砾石上300 mm)。对两种不同的根区类型重复这些操作。试验区在每个赛季都要进行人工足球风格的穿着,并提供灌溉和营养投入,这对于高质量的足球场来说是正常的。在整个试验过程中,永久孔隙上200至300mm根区和砾石上300mm根区的渗透率、根区含水量、草皮覆盖率和牵引强度是相同的。在2年的研究期间,用永久孔隙代替砾石排水层对根区的水力特性或草坪草生长没有负面影响。此外,在某些情况下,可以使用较浅的根区深度,从而减少施工所需的材料体积。较浅的根区(50–100 mm)根区含水量波动较大,这可能与根区深度直接相关。根区类型的影响很小,较细的根区可以保持更多的水分,使草皮稍微结实一些。因此,在管理较浅和/或较粗的根区时,维护计划需要反映这些生长介质的水分和养分保持特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of plastic geocellular modules as a replacement gravel layer for natural turf rootzones

A trial was conducted to assess the suitability of a novel plastic geocellular drainage layer (Permavoid) as a replacement for a conventional gravel layer in a high-quality sports pitch. The trial was conducted during the 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 United Kingdom football (soccer) seasons. Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) was grown under five different rootzone depth treatments (50, 100, 200, and 300 mm over Permavoid and 300 mm over gravel as a control representing current practices). These were repeated for two contrasting rootzone types. The trial area was subjected to artificial football-style wear throughout each playing season, with irrigation and nutritional inputs as would be normal for a high-quality football pitch. Infiltration rates, rootzone moisture content, turf cover and tractional strength for the 200- to 300-mm rootzone over Permavoid and 300 mm over gravel were the same throughout the trial. The replacement of the gravel drainage layer with Permavoid had no negative effect on the rootzone's hydraulic characteristics or turfgrass growth over the 2-yr study period. In addition, it may be possible to use shallower rootzone depths in some circumstances, reducing the volume of material needed for construction. Shallower rootzones (50–100 mm) experienced greater fluctuations in rootzone moisture content, which was likely to be directly related to rootzone depth. Rootzone type had a minor effect, with finer rootzones holding onto more moisture and allowing slightly stronger turf. Therefore, when managing shallower and/or coarser rootzones, maintenance programs need to reflect the moisture and nutrient retention characteristics of these growing media.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poa annua control in golf course putting green collars via fraise mowing Cover Image, Volume 14, Issue 1 14th International Turfgrass Research Conference: Development and Sustainability 14th International Turfgrass Research Conference: Development and Sustainability International Turfgrass Society Research Journal, Volume 14 (2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1