清洁能源技术供应链的技术经济、环境和社会衡量

Jill A. Engel-Cox, Hope M. Wikoff, Samantha B. Reese
{"title":"清洁能源技术供应链的技术经济、环境和社会衡量","authors":"Jill A. Engel-Cox,&nbsp;Hope M. Wikoff,&nbsp;Samantha B. Reese","doi":"10.1002/amp2.10131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In addition to the criteria of reliability and cost, clean energy technologies, such as wind, solar, and batteries, need to strive to a higher standard of environmental and societal benefit along their entire supply chain. This means additional performance metrics for these technologies should be considered, such as embodied energy, embodied carbon, recycled content and recyclability, environmental impact of material sourcing, impact on land and ecosystems, materials recovery at end of life, and production through quality nonexploitive jobs with community benefit. Many commercial and emerging energy technologies have not yet been explicitly evaluated based on these environmental and social performance metrics, which presents multiple opportunities for researchers and analysts. In this paper, we review the importance and current limitations of techno-economic and life-cycle assessment models for research design and manufacturing decisions. We explore emerging manufacturing modeling options that could improve environmental and social performance and how they could be used to help guide research. Even with the deployment of low-carbon energy-generation technologies, the future of a successful clean energy transition requires collaboration between researchers, advanced manufacturers, independent standards and tracking organizations, local communities, and national governments, to ensure the financial, environmental, and social sustainability of the entire supply and manufacturing process of energy technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":87290,"journal":{"name":"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/amp2.10131","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-economic, environmental, and social measurement of clean energy technology supply chains\",\"authors\":\"Jill A. Engel-Cox,&nbsp;Hope M. Wikoff,&nbsp;Samantha B. Reese\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/amp2.10131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In addition to the criteria of reliability and cost, clean energy technologies, such as wind, solar, and batteries, need to strive to a higher standard of environmental and societal benefit along their entire supply chain. This means additional performance metrics for these technologies should be considered, such as embodied energy, embodied carbon, recycled content and recyclability, environmental impact of material sourcing, impact on land and ecosystems, materials recovery at end of life, and production through quality nonexploitive jobs with community benefit. Many commercial and emerging energy technologies have not yet been explicitly evaluated based on these environmental and social performance metrics, which presents multiple opportunities for researchers and analysts. In this paper, we review the importance and current limitations of techno-economic and life-cycle assessment models for research design and manufacturing decisions. We explore emerging manufacturing modeling options that could improve environmental and social performance and how they could be used to help guide research. Even with the deployment of low-carbon energy-generation technologies, the future of a successful clean energy transition requires collaboration between researchers, advanced manufacturers, independent standards and tracking organizations, local communities, and national governments, to ensure the financial, environmental, and social sustainability of the entire supply and manufacturing process of energy technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/amp2.10131\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/amp2.10131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/amp2.10131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

除了可靠性和成本标准外,风能、太阳能和电池等清洁能源技术还需要在整个供应链中努力实现更高标准的环境和社会效益。这意味着应该考虑这些技术的额外性能指标,如内含能量、内含碳、可回收含量和可回收性、材料来源对环境的影响、对土地和生态系统的影响、寿命结束时的材料回收,以及通过具有社区效益的高质量非消耗性工作进行生产。许多商业和新兴能源技术尚未根据这些环境和社会绩效指标进行明确评估,这为研究人员和分析师提供了多种机会。在本文中,我们回顾了技术经济和生命周期评估模型在研究设计和制造决策中的重要性和当前的局限性。我们探索了可以改善环境和社会绩效的新兴制造建模选项,以及如何利用它们来帮助指导研究。即使部署了低碳能源发电技术,清洁能源成功转型的未来也需要研究人员、先进制造商、独立标准和跟踪组织、地方社区和国家政府之间的合作,以确保财政、环境、,以及能源技术的整个供应和制造过程的社会可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Techno-economic, environmental, and social measurement of clean energy technology supply chains

In addition to the criteria of reliability and cost, clean energy technologies, such as wind, solar, and batteries, need to strive to a higher standard of environmental and societal benefit along their entire supply chain. This means additional performance metrics for these technologies should be considered, such as embodied energy, embodied carbon, recycled content and recyclability, environmental impact of material sourcing, impact on land and ecosystems, materials recovery at end of life, and production through quality nonexploitive jobs with community benefit. Many commercial and emerging energy technologies have not yet been explicitly evaluated based on these environmental and social performance metrics, which presents multiple opportunities for researchers and analysts. In this paper, we review the importance and current limitations of techno-economic and life-cycle assessment models for research design and manufacturing decisions. We explore emerging manufacturing modeling options that could improve environmental and social performance and how they could be used to help guide research. Even with the deployment of low-carbon energy-generation technologies, the future of a successful clean energy transition requires collaboration between researchers, advanced manufacturers, independent standards and tracking organizations, local communities, and national governments, to ensure the financial, environmental, and social sustainability of the entire supply and manufacturing process of energy technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Two scale-down tools for the optimization of perfusion bioreactors for the manufacture of biopharmaceuticals CFD modeling and numerical simulation of an industrial adsorption process Enhancing decanter centrifuge process design with data-driven material parameters in multi-compartment modeling Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1