Lewis a-b-组织-血液组抗原表型可预测南非黑人群体中严重的新冠肺炎。

IF 3.4 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Glycobiology Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1093/glycob/cwad090
Cliff A Magwira, Ndivho P Nndwamato, Gloria Selabe, Mapaseka L Seheri
{"title":"Lewis a-b-组织-血液组抗原表型可预测南非黑人群体中严重的新冠肺炎。","authors":"Cliff A Magwira, Ndivho P Nndwamato, Gloria Selabe, Mapaseka L Seheri","doi":"10.1093/glycob/cwad090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several risk factors have been associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections and severity of COVID-19 disease it causes. This study investigated whether variations in histo-blood group antigen (HBGA) expression can predispose individuals to SARS-CoV-2 infections and severity of the disease. Nasopharyngeal swabs, randomly selected from SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals, were tested for Lewis and H-type 1 HBGA phenotypes by ELISA using monoclonal antibodies specific to Lewis a, Lewis b and H type 1 antigens. The most common Lewis HBGA phenotype among all study participants was Lewis a-b+ (46%), followed by Lewis a-b- (24%), Lewis a+b- and Lewis a+b+ (15% each), while 55% of the study participants were H-type 1. Although SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals had a lower likelihood of having a Lewis a-b- phenotype compared to their SARS-CoV-2 positives counterparts (OR: 0.53, 95% C.I: 0.255-1.113), it did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.055). The frequency of Lewis a+b+, Lewis a+B-, Lewis a-b+, H type 1 positive and H type 1 negative were consistent between SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals. When stratified according to severity of the disease, individuals with Lewis a+b- phenotype had a higher likelihood of developing mild COVID-19 symptoms (OR: 3.27, 95% CI; 0.9604-11.1), but was not statistically significant (P = 0.055), while Lewis a-b- phenotype was predictive of severe COVID-19 symptoms (OR: 4.3, 95% CI: 1.274-14.81), P = 0.016. In conclusion, individuals with Lewis a-b- phenotype were less likely to be infected by SARS-CoV-2, but when infected, they were at risk of severe COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":12766,"journal":{"name":"Glycobiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lewis a-b- histo-blood group antigen phenotype is predictive of severe COVID-19 in the black South African population group.\",\"authors\":\"Cliff A Magwira, Ndivho P Nndwamato, Gloria Selabe, Mapaseka L Seheri\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/glycob/cwad090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Several risk factors have been associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections and severity of COVID-19 disease it causes. This study investigated whether variations in histo-blood group antigen (HBGA) expression can predispose individuals to SARS-CoV-2 infections and severity of the disease. Nasopharyngeal swabs, randomly selected from SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals, were tested for Lewis and H-type 1 HBGA phenotypes by ELISA using monoclonal antibodies specific to Lewis a, Lewis b and H type 1 antigens. The most common Lewis HBGA phenotype among all study participants was Lewis a-b+ (46%), followed by Lewis a-b- (24%), Lewis a+b- and Lewis a+b+ (15% each), while 55% of the study participants were H-type 1. Although SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals had a lower likelihood of having a Lewis a-b- phenotype compared to their SARS-CoV-2 positives counterparts (OR: 0.53, 95% C.I: 0.255-1.113), it did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.055). The frequency of Lewis a+b+, Lewis a+B-, Lewis a-b+, H type 1 positive and H type 1 negative were consistent between SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals. When stratified according to severity of the disease, individuals with Lewis a+b- phenotype had a higher likelihood of developing mild COVID-19 symptoms (OR: 3.27, 95% CI; 0.9604-11.1), but was not statistically significant (P = 0.055), while Lewis a-b- phenotype was predictive of severe COVID-19 symptoms (OR: 4.3, 95% CI: 1.274-14.81), P = 0.016. In conclusion, individuals with Lewis a-b- phenotype were less likely to be infected by SARS-CoV-2, but when infected, they were at risk of severe COVID-19.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Glycobiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Glycobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwad090\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glycobiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwad090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几个风险因素与SARS-CoV-2感染及其引发的新冠肺炎疾病的严重程度有关。这项研究调查了组织血型抗原(HBGA)表达的变化是否会使个体易患严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染和疾病的严重程度。从严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型阳性和严重急性呼吸系冠状病毒2型阴性个体中随机选择鼻咽拭子,使用特异于Lewis a、Lewis b和H型1抗原的单克隆抗体,通过ELISA检测Lewis和H型HBGA表型。在所有研究参与者中,最常见的Lewis HBGA表型是Lewis a-b+(46%),其次是Lewis a-b-(24%)、Lewis a+b-和Lewis a+b+(各15%),而55%的研究参与者是H型1。尽管与严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型阳性个体相比,严重急性呼吸系冠状病毒2型阴性个体具有Lewis a-b-表型的可能性较低(OR:0.53,95%C.I:0.255-1.113),但没有达到统计学意义(P=0.055),1型H阳性和1型H阴性在严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型阳性和2型阴性个体之间是一致的。当根据疾病严重程度进行分层时,具有Lewis a+b-表型的个体出现轻度新冠肺炎症状的可能性更高(OR:3.27,95%CI;0.9604-11.1),但无统计学意义(P=0.055),而Lewis a-b-表型可预测严重的新冠肺炎症状(OR:4.3,95%CI:1.274-14.81),P=0.016。总之,具有Lewis a-b表型的个体感染SARS-CoV-2的可能性较低,但当被感染时,他们有患严重新冠肺炎的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lewis a-b- histo-blood group antigen phenotype is predictive of severe COVID-19 in the black South African population group.

Several risk factors have been associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections and severity of COVID-19 disease it causes. This study investigated whether variations in histo-blood group antigen (HBGA) expression can predispose individuals to SARS-CoV-2 infections and severity of the disease. Nasopharyngeal swabs, randomly selected from SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals, were tested for Lewis and H-type 1 HBGA phenotypes by ELISA using monoclonal antibodies specific to Lewis a, Lewis b and H type 1 antigens. The most common Lewis HBGA phenotype among all study participants was Lewis a-b+ (46%), followed by Lewis a-b- (24%), Lewis a+b- and Lewis a+b+ (15% each), while 55% of the study participants were H-type 1. Although SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals had a lower likelihood of having a Lewis a-b- phenotype compared to their SARS-CoV-2 positives counterparts (OR: 0.53, 95% C.I: 0.255-1.113), it did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.055). The frequency of Lewis a+b+, Lewis a+B-, Lewis a-b+, H type 1 positive and H type 1 negative were consistent between SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals. When stratified according to severity of the disease, individuals with Lewis a+b- phenotype had a higher likelihood of developing mild COVID-19 symptoms (OR: 3.27, 95% CI; 0.9604-11.1), but was not statistically significant (P = 0.055), while Lewis a-b- phenotype was predictive of severe COVID-19 symptoms (OR: 4.3, 95% CI: 1.274-14.81), P = 0.016. In conclusion, individuals with Lewis a-b- phenotype were less likely to be infected by SARS-CoV-2, but when infected, they were at risk of severe COVID-19.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Glycobiology
Glycobiology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Established as the leading journal in the field, Glycobiology provides a unique forum dedicated to research into the biological functions of glycans, including glycoproteins, glycolipids, proteoglycans and free oligosaccharides, and on proteins that specifically interact with glycans (including lectins, glycosyltransferases, and glycosidases). Glycobiology is essential reading for researchers in biomedicine, basic science, and the biotechnology industries. By providing a single forum, the journal aims to improve communication between glycobiologists working in different disciplines and to increase the overall visibility of the field.
期刊最新文献
A self-immolative Kdn-glycoside substrate enables high-throughput screening for inhibitors of Kdnases. Galectin-3 disrupts tight junctions of airway epithelial cell monolayers by inducing expression and release of matrix metalloproteinases upon influenza a infection. The 1st International Symposium on GPI and its Deficiency: Bridging Basic Research to Medical Frontiers in PNH and IGD. Why Nature Evolved GPI-anchored proteins: Unique Structure Characteristics Enable Versatile Cell Surface Functions. The diversity of glycan chains in jellyfish mucin of three Cubozoan species: the contrast in molecular evolution rates of the peptide chain and Glycans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1