攻击性人格的结构。

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1111/jopy.12895
David S. Chester, Michael L. Crowe, Courtland S. Hyatt, Joshua D. Miller
{"title":"攻击性人格的结构。","authors":"David S. Chester,&nbsp;Michael L. Crowe,&nbsp;Courtland S. Hyatt,&nbsp;Joshua D. Miller","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We sought to factor analyze a broad array of aggression measures to identify a comprehensive, coherent factor structure for this construct.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Measures and models of trait aggression have multiplied to the point of incoherence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>In Study 1, a diverse sample of 922 undergraduates completed a battery of items acquired from 42 self-report aggression questionnaires. In Study 2, we administered a curated item pool to another diverse sample of 1447 undergraduates, alongside criterion measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We curated an initial item pool of 734 items down to 289 items that exhibited sufficient variability, were not redundant with other items, and possessed strong loadings onto a central ‘trait aggression’ factor. These remaining items were best characterized by a six-factor structure, which captured relational, angry, violent, retaliatory, intimate partner, and alcohol forms of aggression. We estimated their hierarchical structure, correlations with their original aggression scales, Five Factor Model trait dimensions, impulsivity facets, and found them to be robust to gender composition and the inclusion of alcohol-naive and intimate-partner-naive participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This factor structure mostly supported widely-accepted models of aggressive personality that focus on its overt and relational forms and reactive functions, though proactive aggression only loosely emerged as a distinct entity. We retained the final items as the Comprehensive Aggression Scale (CAS).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":"92 5","pages":"1375-1393"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The structure of aggressive personality\",\"authors\":\"David S. Chester,&nbsp;Michael L. Crowe,&nbsp;Courtland S. Hyatt,&nbsp;Joshua D. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopy.12895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>We sought to factor analyze a broad array of aggression measures to identify a comprehensive, coherent factor structure for this construct.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Measures and models of trait aggression have multiplied to the point of incoherence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>In Study 1, a diverse sample of 922 undergraduates completed a battery of items acquired from 42 self-report aggression questionnaires. In Study 2, we administered a curated item pool to another diverse sample of 1447 undergraduates, alongside criterion measures.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We curated an initial item pool of 734 items down to 289 items that exhibited sufficient variability, were not redundant with other items, and possessed strong loadings onto a central ‘trait aggression’ factor. These remaining items were best characterized by a six-factor structure, which captured relational, angry, violent, retaliatory, intimate partner, and alcohol forms of aggression. We estimated their hierarchical structure, correlations with their original aggression scales, Five Factor Model trait dimensions, impulsivity facets, and found them to be robust to gender composition and the inclusion of alcohol-naive and intimate-partner-naive participants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This factor structure mostly supported widely-accepted models of aggressive personality that focus on its overt and relational forms and reactive functions, though proactive aggression only loosely emerged as a distinct entity. We retained the final items as the Comprehensive Aggression Scale (CAS).</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personality\",\"volume\":\"92 5\",\"pages\":\"1375-1393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopy.12895\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopy.12895","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们试图对一系列广泛的攻击性措施进行因子分析,以确定这一结构的全面、连贯的因子结构。背景:特征攻击的测量和模型已经成倍增加到了不连贯的地步。方法:在研究1中,922名本科生的不同样本完成了从42份自我报告的攻击性问卷中获得的一系列项目。在研究2中,我们对1447名本科生的另一个不同样本进行了一个精心策划的项目库,并进行了标准测量。结果:我们策划了一个由734个项目组成的初始项目库,减少到289个项目,这些项目表现出足够的可变性,与其他项目没有冗余,并且对一个核心的“特质攻击性”因素有很强的负载。剩下的这些项目最好的特点是六因素结构,它捕捉到了关系型、愤怒型、暴力型、报复型、亲密伴侣型和酒精型的攻击。我们估计了他们的等级结构、与原始攻击性量表的相关性、五因素模型特征维度、冲动方面,并发现他们对性别构成以及酒精天真和亲密伴侣天真参与者的参与都很稳健。结论:这种因素结构大多支持广泛接受的攻击性人格模型,这些模型侧重于其显性和关系形式以及反应功能,尽管主动攻击只是作为一个独特的实体松散地出现。我们保留了最后的项目作为综合侵略量表(CAS)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The structure of aggressive personality

Objective

We sought to factor analyze a broad array of aggression measures to identify a comprehensive, coherent factor structure for this construct.

Background

Measures and models of trait aggression have multiplied to the point of incoherence.

Method

In Study 1, a diverse sample of 922 undergraduates completed a battery of items acquired from 42 self-report aggression questionnaires. In Study 2, we administered a curated item pool to another diverse sample of 1447 undergraduates, alongside criterion measures.

Results

We curated an initial item pool of 734 items down to 289 items that exhibited sufficient variability, were not redundant with other items, and possessed strong loadings onto a central ‘trait aggression’ factor. These remaining items were best characterized by a six-factor structure, which captured relational, angry, violent, retaliatory, intimate partner, and alcohol forms of aggression. We estimated their hierarchical structure, correlations with their original aggression scales, Five Factor Model trait dimensions, impulsivity facets, and found them to be robust to gender composition and the inclusion of alcohol-naive and intimate-partner-naive participants.

Conclusions

This factor structure mostly supported widely-accepted models of aggressive personality that focus on its overt and relational forms and reactive functions, though proactive aggression only loosely emerged as a distinct entity. We retained the final items as the Comprehensive Aggression Scale (CAS).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
期刊最新文献
The (Un)Attractiveness of Dark Triad Personalities: Assessing Fictitious Characters for Short- and Long-Term Relationships. Understanding Parenting Stress in Adoptive Parents: A Longitudinal Multilevel Study of Parents' Self-Criticism, Child Negative Emotionality, and Child Age at Placement. Personality and Meat Consumption Among Romantic Partners in Daily Life Development of Self‐Reported Reward Responsiveness and Inhibitory Control and the Role of Clinical and Neural Predictors Negative Emotion (dys)regulation Predicts Distorted Time Perception: Preliminary Experimental Evidence and Implications for Psychopathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1