增长和衰退中的去中心化:一种灾难理论方法

Donald Baack, John B. Cullen
{"title":"增长和衰退中的去中心化:一种灾难理论方法","authors":"Donald Baack,&nbsp;John B. Cullen","doi":"10.1002/bs.3830390304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Catastrophe theory provided a framework to consider the centralization or decentralization of organizational decision-making. The specific concern was the relationship of centralization to the growth or decline in organizational size. Three bodies of literature contributed to the development of hypotheses. First, catastrophe theory suggested a general framework for studying organizational processes. Second, previous theoretical and empirical evidence regarding the relationships between centralization and size suggested the applicability of a cusp catastrophe model. Third, further implications for centralization were drawn from the literature dealing with evolutionary and revolutionary changes in organizational structure. Based on these reviews, catastrophe theory hypotheses were developed concerning the relationship of changes in size to evolutionary and revolutionary changes in the centralization or decentralization of organizational decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":75578,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral science","volume":"39 3","pages":"213-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bs.3830390304","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decentralization in growth and decline: A catastrophe theory approach\",\"authors\":\"Donald Baack,&nbsp;John B. Cullen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bs.3830390304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Catastrophe theory provided a framework to consider the centralization or decentralization of organizational decision-making. The specific concern was the relationship of centralization to the growth or decline in organizational size. Three bodies of literature contributed to the development of hypotheses. First, catastrophe theory suggested a general framework for studying organizational processes. Second, previous theoretical and empirical evidence regarding the relationships between centralization and size suggested the applicability of a cusp catastrophe model. Third, further implications for centralization were drawn from the literature dealing with evolutionary and revolutionary changes in organizational structure. Based on these reviews, catastrophe theory hypotheses were developed concerning the relationship of changes in size to evolutionary and revolutionary changes in the centralization or decentralization of organizational decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral science\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"213-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bs.3830390304\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bs.3830390304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bs.3830390304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

突变理论提供了一个考虑组织决策集中或分散的框架。具体关注的是集中化与组织规模增长或下降的关系。三个方面的文献对假说的发展做出了贡献。首先,突变理论提出了研究组织过程的一般框架。其次,先前关于集中度和规模之间关系的理论和经验证据表明了尖点突变模型的适用性。第三,从关于组织结构的进化和革命性变化的文献中可以进一步了解到中央集权的含义。基于这些综述,提出了关于规模变化与组织决策集中或分散的进化和革命性变化之间关系的突变理论假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decentralization in growth and decline: A catastrophe theory approach

Catastrophe theory provided a framework to consider the centralization or decentralization of organizational decision-making. The specific concern was the relationship of centralization to the growth or decline in organizational size. Three bodies of literature contributed to the development of hypotheses. First, catastrophe theory suggested a general framework for studying organizational processes. Second, previous theoretical and empirical evidence regarding the relationships between centralization and size suggested the applicability of a cusp catastrophe model. Third, further implications for centralization were drawn from the literature dealing with evolutionary and revolutionary changes in organizational structure. Based on these reviews, catastrophe theory hypotheses were developed concerning the relationship of changes in size to evolutionary and revolutionary changes in the centralization or decentralization of organizational decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
My role in the assessment program of the office of strategic services A look back at the systems society An application of nonlinear dynamics to the presidential nomination process About the authors Living systems theory as a paradigm for organizational behavior: Understanding humans, organizations, and social processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1