{"title":"从克鲁格曼到行为凯恩斯","authors":"Ian M. McDonald","doi":"10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"John Cochrane appears to concede that Paul Krugman's critique does have some important pillars to be paid attention to. Krugman views Keynesian economics as the best framework for macroeconomics that advocates that it is inadequate aggregate demand that drives recessions, not confusion about relative prices, nor lapses in technical progress, nor voluntary shifts to leisure during times of low real wages.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":" 6","pages":"89-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Krugman to Behavioural Keynes\",\"authors\":\"Ian M. McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"John Cochrane appears to concede that Paul Krugman's critique does have some important pillars to be paid attention to. Krugman views Keynesian economics as the best framework for macroeconomics that advocates that it is inadequate aggregate demand that drives recessions, not confusion about relative prices, nor lapses in technical progress, nor voluntary shifts to leisure during times of low real wages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"volume\":\" 6\",\"pages\":\"89-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
John Cochrane appears to concede that Paul Krugman's critique does have some important pillars to be paid attention to. Krugman views Keynesian economics as the best framework for macroeconomics that advocates that it is inadequate aggregate demand that drives recessions, not confusion about relative prices, nor lapses in technical progress, nor voluntary shifts to leisure during times of low real wages.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
