波斯语版UCLA老年态度量表(UCLA- gas)的心理测量特性。

N. Zanjari, Yadollah Abolfathi Momtaz, Tayebe Abdollahi
{"title":"波斯语版UCLA老年态度量表(UCLA- gas)的心理测量特性。","authors":"N. Zanjari, Yadollah Abolfathi Momtaz, Tayebe Abdollahi","doi":"10.2174/1874609815666220419104512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\nThe attitudes toward older patients are considered the main factor in providing health services.\n\n\nBACKGROUND\nThere is a lack of a proper short scale to measure attitudes toward older patients among healthcare professionals.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThe present study was to assess the psychometric properties of the UCLA Geriatric Attitude scale (UCLA-GAS) among a sample of Iranian healthcare professionals.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe method of this study was cross-sectional for psychometric evaluation. The sample included 232 healthcare professionals in Mazandaran city. Study participants were selected by cluster random sampling technique. Psychometric evaluation of the UCLA-GAS assessed through content and construct validity. Content validity was evaluated based on the content validity index (CVI) and construct validity investigated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Also, convergent validity was assessed using the Kogan's Attitudes Toward Older People Scale (KAOPS) questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate internal consistency reliability and stability was assessed using test-retest.\n\n\nRESULTS\nRegarding the content validity, CVI and modified Kappa statistic for all items were >0.79 and shows all items where relevant to the UCLA-GAS in the Iranian context. The three dimensions of the UCLA-GAS extracted from factor analysis were labeled: 1- medical/economic burden (6 items) 2- appreciate attitude (5 items), 3- resource allocation (3 items). CFA revealed that the UCLA-GAS structure model was a validated model (CMIN = 2.312, GFI = 0.913, CFI = 0.902, RMSEA = 0.075). The scale had a significant and positive correlation with KAOPS questionnaire. Also, The Cronbach's alpha of the scale was 0.78 and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), for total instrument was reported as 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87-0.98) and demonstrated good reliability of the instrument.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe result shows the UCLA-GAS is a valid and reliable scale for measuring attitude toward older patient among healthcare professionals. This study recommends using Iranian UCLA-GAS in future research and policy-making.","PeriodicalId":11008,"journal":{"name":"Current aging science","volume":"530 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the UCLA geriatrics attitudes scale (UCLA-GAS).\",\"authors\":\"N. Zanjari, Yadollah Abolfathi Momtaz, Tayebe Abdollahi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874609815666220419104512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIMS\\nThe attitudes toward older patients are considered the main factor in providing health services.\\n\\n\\nBACKGROUND\\nThere is a lack of a proper short scale to measure attitudes toward older patients among healthcare professionals.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE\\nThe present study was to assess the psychometric properties of the UCLA Geriatric Attitude scale (UCLA-GAS) among a sample of Iranian healthcare professionals.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThe method of this study was cross-sectional for psychometric evaluation. The sample included 232 healthcare professionals in Mazandaran city. Study participants were selected by cluster random sampling technique. Psychometric evaluation of the UCLA-GAS assessed through content and construct validity. Content validity was evaluated based on the content validity index (CVI) and construct validity investigated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Also, convergent validity was assessed using the Kogan's Attitudes Toward Older People Scale (KAOPS) questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate internal consistency reliability and stability was assessed using test-retest.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nRegarding the content validity, CVI and modified Kappa statistic for all items were >0.79 and shows all items where relevant to the UCLA-GAS in the Iranian context. The three dimensions of the UCLA-GAS extracted from factor analysis were labeled: 1- medical/economic burden (6 items) 2- appreciate attitude (5 items), 3- resource allocation (3 items). CFA revealed that the UCLA-GAS structure model was a validated model (CMIN = 2.312, GFI = 0.913, CFI = 0.902, RMSEA = 0.075). The scale had a significant and positive correlation with KAOPS questionnaire. Also, The Cronbach's alpha of the scale was 0.78 and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), for total instrument was reported as 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87-0.98) and demonstrated good reliability of the instrument.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThe result shows the UCLA-GAS is a valid and reliable scale for measuring attitude toward older patient among healthcare professionals. This study recommends using Iranian UCLA-GAS in future research and policy-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current aging science\",\"volume\":\"530 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current aging science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874609815666220419104512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current aging science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874609815666220419104512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对老年病人的态度被认为是提供保健服务的主要因素。背景缺乏适当的短量表来衡量医疗保健专业人员对老年患者的态度。目的本研究旨在评估UCLA老年态度量表(UCLA- gas)在伊朗医疗保健专业人员中的心理测量特性。方法本研究采用横断面法进行心理测量。样本包括Mazandaran市的232名医疗保健专业人员。研究对象采用整群随机抽样方法。通过内容效度和构念效度对UCLA-GAS进行心理测量评价。采用内容效度指数(CVI)评价内容效度,采用探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析考察结构效度。同时,采用Kogan对老年人态度量表(KAOPS)进行收敛效度评估。采用Cronbach’s alpha评价内部一致性,采用重测法评价信度和稳定性。结果在内容效度方面,所有项目的CVI和修正Kappa统计量均为bb0.79,并显示了所有与伊朗背景下UCLA-GAS相关的项目。因子分析提取的UCLA-GAS三个维度标记为:1-医疗/经济负担(6项)2-感激态度(5项)3-资源分配(3项)。CFA结果表明,UCLA-GAS结构模型是经过验证的模型(CMIN = 2.312, GFI = 0.913, CFI = 0.902, RMSEA = 0.075)。量表与KAOPS问卷存在显著正相关。此外,量表的Cronbach's alpha为0.78,类内相关系数(ICC)为0.93 (95% CI: 0.87-0.98),表明该仪器具有良好的信度。结论UCLA-GAS量表是一种有效、可靠的老年患者态度测评量表。本研究建议在未来的研究和决策中使用伊朗UCLA-GAS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the UCLA geriatrics attitudes scale (UCLA-GAS).
AIMS The attitudes toward older patients are considered the main factor in providing health services. BACKGROUND There is a lack of a proper short scale to measure attitudes toward older patients among healthcare professionals. OBJECTIVE The present study was to assess the psychometric properties of the UCLA Geriatric Attitude scale (UCLA-GAS) among a sample of Iranian healthcare professionals. METHODS The method of this study was cross-sectional for psychometric evaluation. The sample included 232 healthcare professionals in Mazandaran city. Study participants were selected by cluster random sampling technique. Psychometric evaluation of the UCLA-GAS assessed through content and construct validity. Content validity was evaluated based on the content validity index (CVI) and construct validity investigated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Also, convergent validity was assessed using the Kogan's Attitudes Toward Older People Scale (KAOPS) questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate internal consistency reliability and stability was assessed using test-retest. RESULTS Regarding the content validity, CVI and modified Kappa statistic for all items were >0.79 and shows all items where relevant to the UCLA-GAS in the Iranian context. The three dimensions of the UCLA-GAS extracted from factor analysis were labeled: 1- medical/economic burden (6 items) 2- appreciate attitude (5 items), 3- resource allocation (3 items). CFA revealed that the UCLA-GAS structure model was a validated model (CMIN = 2.312, GFI = 0.913, CFI = 0.902, RMSEA = 0.075). The scale had a significant and positive correlation with KAOPS questionnaire. Also, The Cronbach's alpha of the scale was 0.78 and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), for total instrument was reported as 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87-0.98) and demonstrated good reliability of the instrument. CONCLUSION The result shows the UCLA-GAS is a valid and reliable scale for measuring attitude toward older patient among healthcare professionals. This study recommends using Iranian UCLA-GAS in future research and policy-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current aging science
Current aging science Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
New Insights into Colorectal Cancer through the Lens of Precision Oncology and Personalized Medicine: Multi-Omics Helps Aging of Predisposed People. A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in Aging and Leisure Activities from 2000 to 2023. Shorter Telomere Length is Associated with Food Insecurity in Older People: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD)-Dependent Protein Deacetylase, Sirtuin, as a Biomarker of Healthy Life Expectancy: A Mini-Review. Hypoxia-reoxygenation Extends the Lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans via SKN-1- and DAF-16A-Dependent Stress Hormesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1