从认识论、科学结构和术语三个视角来看待巴西知识组织的认识论维度

IF 0.2 4区 管理学 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Investigacion Bibliotecologica Pub Date : 2021-10-22 DOI:10.22201/IIBI.24488321XE.2021.89.58457
Maíra Fernandes Alencar, Brígida Maria Nogueira Cervantes
{"title":"从认识论、科学结构和术语三个视角来看待巴西知识组织的认识论维度","authors":"Maíra Fernandes Alencar, Brígida Maria Nogueira Cervantes","doi":"10.22201/IIBI.24488321XE.2021.89.58457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the study is to present a mapping of the works that were presented in the epistemological dimension. The methodology used was content analysis for purposes of categorization and domain analysis with three study approaches: 1) Epistemological - to identify the themes of research; 2) Structure of scientific communication - whose focus is on describing year, authors and institutions; and finally, 3) Terminological studies, by extracting from the titles of publications representative terms, to categorize and collate with the Brazilian Thesaurus of Information Science and the Diccionario de organizacion del conocimiento: Clasificacion, Indizacion, Terminologia. The results reveal that the themes are predominant on a conceptual basis, followed by interdisciplinary dialogues; the work is carried out by 26 (twenty-six) institutions with the highest incidence at the Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho” Campus - Marilia; and with regard to terminological studies, based on categorization, the terms that prevail in the titles come from the areas of Thematic Treatment of Information and Knowledge Organization Systems, with a medium level of compatibility in terminological instruments.","PeriodicalId":44196,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion Bibliotecologica","volume":"35 2","pages":"195-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mirando la dimensión epistemológica de la organización del conocimiento brasileño con tres lentes de análisis de dominio: epistemológico, de estructuración científica y terminológico\",\"authors\":\"Maíra Fernandes Alencar, Brígida Maria Nogueira Cervantes\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/IIBI.24488321XE.2021.89.58457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the study is to present a mapping of the works that were presented in the epistemological dimension. The methodology used was content analysis for purposes of categorization and domain analysis with three study approaches: 1) Epistemological - to identify the themes of research; 2) Structure of scientific communication - whose focus is on describing year, authors and institutions; and finally, 3) Terminological studies, by extracting from the titles of publications representative terms, to categorize and collate with the Brazilian Thesaurus of Information Science and the Diccionario de organizacion del conocimiento: Clasificacion, Indizacion, Terminologia. The results reveal that the themes are predominant on a conceptual basis, followed by interdisciplinary dialogues; the work is carried out by 26 (twenty-six) institutions with the highest incidence at the Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho” Campus - Marilia; and with regard to terminological studies, based on categorization, the terms that prevail in the titles come from the areas of Thematic Treatment of Information and Knowledge Organization Systems, with a medium level of compatibility in terminological instruments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigacion Bibliotecologica\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"195-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigacion Bibliotecologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIBI.24488321XE.2021.89.58457\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion Bibliotecologica","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIBI.24488321XE.2021.89.58457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是在认识论维度上呈现作品的映射。使用的方法是内容分析,目的是分类和领域分析,有三种研究方法:1)认识论-确定研究主题;2)科学传播的结构——其重点是描述年份、作者和机构;3)术语研究,从出版物的标题中提取具有代表性的术语,并与巴西信息科学同义词库和经济组织词典进行分类和整理:classiacion, Indizacion, Terminologia。结果表明,主题在概念基础上占主导地位,其次是跨学科对话;这项工作由26个(26个)机构开展,其中最高的发生率在universsidade Estadual Paulista“Julio de Mesquita Filho”校区- Marilia;关于以分类为基础的术语研究,标题中普遍使用的术语来自《信息和知识组织系统专题处理》领域,在术语文书中具有中等程度的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mirando la dimensión epistemológica de la organización del conocimiento brasileño con tres lentes de análisis de dominio: epistemológico, de estructuración científica y terminológico
The objective of the study is to present a mapping of the works that were presented in the epistemological dimension. The methodology used was content analysis for purposes of categorization and domain analysis with three study approaches: 1) Epistemological - to identify the themes of research; 2) Structure of scientific communication - whose focus is on describing year, authors and institutions; and finally, 3) Terminological studies, by extracting from the titles of publications representative terms, to categorize and collate with the Brazilian Thesaurus of Information Science and the Diccionario de organizacion del conocimiento: Clasificacion, Indizacion, Terminologia. The results reveal that the themes are predominant on a conceptual basis, followed by interdisciplinary dialogues; the work is carried out by 26 (twenty-six) institutions with the highest incidence at the Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho” Campus - Marilia; and with regard to terminological studies, based on categorization, the terms that prevail in the titles come from the areas of Thematic Treatment of Information and Knowledge Organization Systems, with a medium level of compatibility in terminological instruments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigacion Bibliotecologica
Investigacion Bibliotecologica INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reconstruction of archive buildings: the case of Brazil Uso da Tecnologia Digital pelos povos indígenas no Brasil: um estudo na Aldeia Kaingang Capital humano, Design Thinking y reinvención de la biblioteca pública en Perú Producción científica en Bibliotecología y Ciencia de la Información en Puerto Rico (1961-2020) Patrimônio e memória de bibliotecas universitárias no sul do Brasil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1