香蕉树营养实验中的分数阶乘案例研究

Paulo Cesar Carvalho Ribeiro, Matheus Pena Campos, L. A. S. Pio, J. S. S. B. Filho
{"title":"香蕉树营养实验中的分数阶乘案例研究","authors":"Paulo Cesar Carvalho Ribeiro, Matheus Pena Campos, L. A. S. Pio, J. S. S. B. Filho","doi":"10.28951/rbb.v37i3.402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we study combining designs concatenating levels from a full factorial for some factors with screening alternatives for the others. This was done to deal with a practical situation in plant nutrition experiments. The original problem was a study design for 14 potential factors in banana tree nutrition, and researchers imagined four full factorials were needed to test their hypothesis, being two from the 33 and two of the 34 series. As this would demand at least 216 experimental units and facing limited resources we seek for a different planning strategy. The idea was to combine in the same experiment four  instances of DSD (Denitive Screening Designs) for 10 three-level factors, each in a different block, with a fraction of the full factorial of the 34 series. A central point treatment, with average level for all factors, was present in all blocks. Interchange algorithms were used to concatenate the factor levels. Resulting optimized design was compared to the designs sampled following the same principle. Design comparison criterion was the expected average variance of the estimates for factors (Ar optimality). Optimization  reduced 4.02% of the average values of the criterion in a reference population of sampled designs. It was possible to show that the variance for linear and quadratic effects in the full factorial were higher than in the optimized plan. As an example, the analysis of an actual eld trial is presented. Authors recommend the use of fractional factorial strategy including DSD designs in agronomic trials, specially in the screening phase.","PeriodicalId":36293,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Biometria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FRACTIONAL FACTORIALS IN A CASE STUDY NUTRITION EXPERIMENT WITH BANANA TREES\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Cesar Carvalho Ribeiro, Matheus Pena Campos, L. A. S. Pio, J. S. S. B. Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.28951/rbb.v37i3.402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we study combining designs concatenating levels from a full factorial for some factors with screening alternatives for the others. This was done to deal with a practical situation in plant nutrition experiments. The original problem was a study design for 14 potential factors in banana tree nutrition, and researchers imagined four full factorials were needed to test their hypothesis, being two from the 33 and two of the 34 series. As this would demand at least 216 experimental units and facing limited resources we seek for a different planning strategy. The idea was to combine in the same experiment four  instances of DSD (Denitive Screening Designs) for 10 three-level factors, each in a different block, with a fraction of the full factorial of the 34 series. A central point treatment, with average level for all factors, was present in all blocks. Interchange algorithms were used to concatenate the factor levels. Resulting optimized design was compared to the designs sampled following the same principle. Design comparison criterion was the expected average variance of the estimates for factors (Ar optimality). Optimization  reduced 4.02% of the average values of the criterion in a reference population of sampled designs. It was possible to show that the variance for linear and quadratic effects in the full factorial were higher than in the optimized plan. As an example, the analysis of an actual eld trial is presented. Authors recommend the use of fractional factorial strategy including DSD designs in agronomic trials, specially in the screening phase.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Biometria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Biometria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28951/rbb.v37i3.402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Biometria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28951/rbb.v37i3.402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了组合设计,从一个全因子串联水平的一些因素与筛选替代方案的其他因素。本文针对植物营养实验中的实际情况进行了研究。最初的问题是一项针对香蕉树营养中14个潜在因素的研究设计,研究人员认为需要四个完整的阶乘来验证他们的假设,即33个系列中的两个和34个系列中的两个。由于这将需要至少216个实验单位,并且面对有限的资源,我们寻求不同的规划策略。我们的想法是在同一个实验中结合4个DSD(否定筛选设计)实例,用于10个三级因素,每个因素在不同的块中,与34个系列的全因子的一小部分。中心点治疗,所有因素的平均水平,存在于所有块。交换算法用于连接因子水平。将得到的优化设计与遵循相同原则的抽样设计进行比较。设计比较标准为各因子估计的期望平均方差(Ar最优性)。在抽样设计的参考群体中,优化使标准的平均值降低了4.02%。可以看出,全因子中线性和二次效应的方差高于优化方案。并以实际现场试验为例进行了分析。作者建议在农艺试验中使用包括DSD设计在内的分数因子策略,特别是在筛选阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FRACTIONAL FACTORIALS IN A CASE STUDY NUTRITION EXPERIMENT WITH BANANA TREES
In this paper we study combining designs concatenating levels from a full factorial for some factors with screening alternatives for the others. This was done to deal with a practical situation in plant nutrition experiments. The original problem was a study design for 14 potential factors in banana tree nutrition, and researchers imagined four full factorials were needed to test their hypothesis, being two from the 33 and two of the 34 series. As this would demand at least 216 experimental units and facing limited resources we seek for a different planning strategy. The idea was to combine in the same experiment four  instances of DSD (Denitive Screening Designs) for 10 three-level factors, each in a different block, with a fraction of the full factorial of the 34 series. A central point treatment, with average level for all factors, was present in all blocks. Interchange algorithms were used to concatenate the factor levels. Resulting optimized design was compared to the designs sampled following the same principle. Design comparison criterion was the expected average variance of the estimates for factors (Ar optimality). Optimization  reduced 4.02% of the average values of the criterion in a reference population of sampled designs. It was possible to show that the variance for linear and quadratic effects in the full factorial were higher than in the optimized plan. As an example, the analysis of an actual eld trial is presented. Authors recommend the use of fractional factorial strategy including DSD designs in agronomic trials, specially in the screening phase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Biometria
Revista Brasileira de Biometria Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
CLUSTER ANALYSIS IDENTIFIES VARIABLES RELATED TO PROGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER DISEASE UROCHLOA GRASS GROWTH AS A FUNCTION OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION BEST LINEAR UNBIASED LATENT VALUES PREDICTORS FOR FINITE POPULATION LINEAR MODELS WITH DIFFERENT ERROR SOURCES ANALYSIS OF COVID-19 CONTAMINATION AND DEATHS CASES IN BRAZIL ACCORDING TO THE NEWCOMB-BENFORD INCIDENCE AND LETHALITY OF COVID-19 CLUSTERS IN BRAZIL VIA CIRCULAR SCAN METHOD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1