胆道菌群多样性与胆总管结石复发相关性的初步研究

Xiufang Zha, Shunfu Xu, Hong-xia Zhu, Xiaoxing Chen, Wenfang Cheng, Bin Xiao, Guosheng Chen, Jin-liang Ni
{"title":"胆道菌群多样性与胆总管结石复发相关性的初步研究","authors":"Xiufang Zha, Shunfu Xu, Hong-xia Zhu, Xiaoxing Chen, Wenfang Cheng, Bin Xiao, Guosheng Chen, Jin-liang Ni","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the correlation between the diversity of biliary bacterial flora and the recurrence of common bile duct stones. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom September 2018 to March 2019, 48 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were enrolled and divided into primary choledocholithiasis (primary group, 38 patients) and recurrent choledocholithiasis group (recurrent group, 10 patients). The bile of the patients of the two groups was collected and analyzed with high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA. The Chao1 estimator indicated the richness of the biliary bacterial flora, and Shannon index and Simpson index demonstrated the diversity of biliary bacterial flora. The bacterial flora distribution was explored from different levels of phylum, class, order, family, genus and species. Chi-square test and t test were performed for statistical analysis. \n \n \nResults \nThe Chao1 estimator of the primary group was higher than that of the recurrent group (419.413±118.704 vs. 396.000±70.483), and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.130, P=0.003). At the level of the phylum, the highest abundance of bacteria in the primary group was Firmicute (56.48%), the highest abundance of bacteria in the recurrent group was Proteobacteria (57.79%). The dominant bacteria of the recurrent group was Proteobacteria, which was inconsistent with that of the primary group, and there were significant differences in the distribution of Proteobacteria and Firmicute between two groups (χ2=0.962 and -2.619, both P<0.05). At the genus level, the abundance of Bacillus and Lactococcus of the recurrent group were both lower than those of the primary group (9.75% vs. 20.77%, 10.86% vs. 22.01%, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=0.354 and 0.503, both P<0.05). The abundance of Morganella of the recurrent group was higher than that of the primary group (9.00% vs. 0.44%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=-2.025, P=0.049). At the species level, the abundance of Bacillus unclassified, Carnobacterium maltaromaticum and Bacillus circulans of the primary group were all higher than those of the recurrent group (17.78% vs. 8.84%, 2.39% vs. 1.11%, 2.59% vs. 0.74%, respectively), and the differences were all statistically significant (χ2=2.540, 2.643 and 2.515, all P<0.05). The abundance of Aeromonas veronii of recurrent group was higher than that of the primary group (2.04% vs. 0.01%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=-2.397, P=0.021). The bacteria that had significant effects in the primary group included Lactococcus (P=0.012), Lactobacillus (P=0.033) and Geobacillus (P=0.021), while in the recurrent group, which included Enterobacter (P=0.007), Aeromonadaceae (P=0.001), Actinomycetes (P=0.009), and Aeromonas (P=0.001). \n \n \nConclusions \nThere are differences in abundance and composition of biliary bacterial flora between the recurrent group and the primary group. It remains to be further studied whether the changes of some bacterial flora correlated with the recurrence of common bile duct stones. \n \n \nKey words: \nCholedocholithiasis; Recurrence of choledocholithiasis; Biliary flora; 16S rRNA","PeriodicalId":10009,"journal":{"name":"中华消化杂志","volume":"8 4","pages":"850-854"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary study on the correlation between diversity of biliary flora and recurrence of common bile duct stones\",\"authors\":\"Xiufang Zha, Shunfu Xu, Hong-xia Zhu, Xiaoxing Chen, Wenfang Cheng, Bin Xiao, Guosheng Chen, Jin-liang Ni\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.12.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the correlation between the diversity of biliary bacterial flora and the recurrence of common bile duct stones. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom September 2018 to March 2019, 48 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were enrolled and divided into primary choledocholithiasis (primary group, 38 patients) and recurrent choledocholithiasis group (recurrent group, 10 patients). The bile of the patients of the two groups was collected and analyzed with high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA. The Chao1 estimator indicated the richness of the biliary bacterial flora, and Shannon index and Simpson index demonstrated the diversity of biliary bacterial flora. The bacterial flora distribution was explored from different levels of phylum, class, order, family, genus and species. Chi-square test and t test were performed for statistical analysis. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe Chao1 estimator of the primary group was higher than that of the recurrent group (419.413±118.704 vs. 396.000±70.483), and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.130, P=0.003). At the level of the phylum, the highest abundance of bacteria in the primary group was Firmicute (56.48%), the highest abundance of bacteria in the recurrent group was Proteobacteria (57.79%). The dominant bacteria of the recurrent group was Proteobacteria, which was inconsistent with that of the primary group, and there were significant differences in the distribution of Proteobacteria and Firmicute between two groups (χ2=0.962 and -2.619, both P<0.05). At the genus level, the abundance of Bacillus and Lactococcus of the recurrent group were both lower than those of the primary group (9.75% vs. 20.77%, 10.86% vs. 22.01%, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=0.354 and 0.503, both P<0.05). The abundance of Morganella of the recurrent group was higher than that of the primary group (9.00% vs. 0.44%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=-2.025, P=0.049). At the species level, the abundance of Bacillus unclassified, Carnobacterium maltaromaticum and Bacillus circulans of the primary group were all higher than those of the recurrent group (17.78% vs. 8.84%, 2.39% vs. 1.11%, 2.59% vs. 0.74%, respectively), and the differences were all statistically significant (χ2=2.540, 2.643 and 2.515, all P<0.05). The abundance of Aeromonas veronii of recurrent group was higher than that of the primary group (2.04% vs. 0.01%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=-2.397, P=0.021). The bacteria that had significant effects in the primary group included Lactococcus (P=0.012), Lactobacillus (P=0.033) and Geobacillus (P=0.021), while in the recurrent group, which included Enterobacter (P=0.007), Aeromonadaceae (P=0.001), Actinomycetes (P=0.009), and Aeromonas (P=0.001). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThere are differences in abundance and composition of biliary bacterial flora between the recurrent group and the primary group. It remains to be further studied whether the changes of some bacterial flora correlated with the recurrence of common bile duct stones. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nCholedocholithiasis; Recurrence of choledocholithiasis; Biliary flora; 16S rRNA\",\"PeriodicalId\":10009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华消化杂志\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"850-854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华消化杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.12.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.12.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨胆道菌群多样性与胆总管结石复发的关系。方法选择2018年9月至2019年3月在南京医科大学第一附属医院行内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)的患者48例,分为原发性胆总管结石组(原发性组,38例)和复发性胆总管结石组(复发组,10例)。收集两组患者胆汁,采用16S rRNA高通量测序进行分析。Chao1估计值反映了胆道菌群的丰富度,Shannon指数和Simpson指数反映了胆道菌群的多样性。从门、纲、目、科、属、种等不同层次探讨了细菌区系分布。采用卡方检验和t检验进行统计学分析。结果首发组的Chao1估计值高于复发组(419.413±118.704比396.000±70.483),差异有统计学意义(t=3.130, P=0.003)。在门水平上,原生组细菌丰度最高的是厚壁菌门(56.48%),复发组细菌丰度最高的是变形菌门(57.79%)。复发组的优势菌群为变形菌门(Proteobacteria),与初发组不一致,两组间Proteobacteria和Firmicute的分布差异有统计学意义(χ2=0.962、-2.619,P<0.05)。在属水平上,复发组Bacillus和Lactococcus的丰度均低于原发组(分别为9.75%∶20.77%、10.86%∶22.01%),差异均有统计学意义(χ2=0.354、0.503,P<0.05)。复发组摩氏菌丰度高于原发组(9.00%比0.44%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=-2.025, P=0.049)。在菌种水平上,原发组未分类芽孢杆菌、恶性肉杆菌和环状芽孢杆菌的丰度均高于复发组(分别为17.78%比8.84%、2.39%比1.11%、2.59%比0.74%),差异均有统计学意义(χ2=2.540、2.643、2.515,P均<0.05)。复发组维氏气单胞菌丰度高于原发组(2.04%比0.01%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=-2.397, P=0.021)。原发组有显著作用的细菌有乳球菌(P=0.012)、乳杆菌(P=0.033)、地杆菌(P=0.021),复发组有肠杆菌(P=0.007)、气单胞菌科(P=0.001)、放线菌(P=0.009)、气单胞菌(P=0.001)。结论复发组与原发组胆道菌群的丰度和组成存在差异。某些菌群的改变是否与胆总管结石的复发有关,有待进一步研究。关键词:胆总管结石;胆总管结石复发;胆道植物;16 s rRNA
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preliminary study on the correlation between diversity of biliary flora and recurrence of common bile duct stones
Objective To investigate the correlation between the diversity of biliary bacterial flora and the recurrence of common bile duct stones. Methods From September 2018 to March 2019, 48 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were enrolled and divided into primary choledocholithiasis (primary group, 38 patients) and recurrent choledocholithiasis group (recurrent group, 10 patients). The bile of the patients of the two groups was collected and analyzed with high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA. The Chao1 estimator indicated the richness of the biliary bacterial flora, and Shannon index and Simpson index demonstrated the diversity of biliary bacterial flora. The bacterial flora distribution was explored from different levels of phylum, class, order, family, genus and species. Chi-square test and t test were performed for statistical analysis. Results The Chao1 estimator of the primary group was higher than that of the recurrent group (419.413±118.704 vs. 396.000±70.483), and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.130, P=0.003). At the level of the phylum, the highest abundance of bacteria in the primary group was Firmicute (56.48%), the highest abundance of bacteria in the recurrent group was Proteobacteria (57.79%). The dominant bacteria of the recurrent group was Proteobacteria, which was inconsistent with that of the primary group, and there were significant differences in the distribution of Proteobacteria and Firmicute between two groups (χ2=0.962 and -2.619, both P<0.05). At the genus level, the abundance of Bacillus and Lactococcus of the recurrent group were both lower than those of the primary group (9.75% vs. 20.77%, 10.86% vs. 22.01%, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=0.354 and 0.503, both P<0.05). The abundance of Morganella of the recurrent group was higher than that of the primary group (9.00% vs. 0.44%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=-2.025, P=0.049). At the species level, the abundance of Bacillus unclassified, Carnobacterium maltaromaticum and Bacillus circulans of the primary group were all higher than those of the recurrent group (17.78% vs. 8.84%, 2.39% vs. 1.11%, 2.59% vs. 0.74%, respectively), and the differences were all statistically significant (χ2=2.540, 2.643 and 2.515, all P<0.05). The abundance of Aeromonas veronii of recurrent group was higher than that of the primary group (2.04% vs. 0.01%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=-2.397, P=0.021). The bacteria that had significant effects in the primary group included Lactococcus (P=0.012), Lactobacillus (P=0.033) and Geobacillus (P=0.021), while in the recurrent group, which included Enterobacter (P=0.007), Aeromonadaceae (P=0.001), Actinomycetes (P=0.009), and Aeromonas (P=0.001). Conclusions There are differences in abundance and composition of biliary bacterial flora between the recurrent group and the primary group. It remains to be further studied whether the changes of some bacterial flora correlated with the recurrence of common bile duct stones. Key words: Choledocholithiasis; Recurrence of choledocholithiasis; Biliary flora; 16S rRNA
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8016
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal symptoms and liver function injury in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 Clinical characteristics of 70 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 accompanied with diarrhea Pay attention to the etiological analysis and management of 2019 coronavirus disease associated liver injury Considerations and suggestions on clinical research for coronavirus disease 2019 Digestive system manifestations and analysis of disease severity in 54 patients with coronavirus disease 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1