Xiufang Zha, Shunfu Xu, Hong-xia Zhu, Xiaoxing Chen, Wenfang Cheng, Bin Xiao, Guosheng Chen, Jin-liang Ni
{"title":"胆道菌群多样性与胆总管结石复发相关性的初步研究","authors":"Xiufang Zha, Shunfu Xu, Hong-xia Zhu, Xiaoxing Chen, Wenfang Cheng, Bin Xiao, Guosheng Chen, Jin-liang Ni","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the correlation between the diversity of biliary bacterial flora and the recurrence of common bile duct stones. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom September 2018 to March 2019, 48 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were enrolled and divided into primary choledocholithiasis (primary group, 38 patients) and recurrent choledocholithiasis group (recurrent group, 10 patients). The bile of the patients of the two groups was collected and analyzed with high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA. The Chao1 estimator indicated the richness of the biliary bacterial flora, and Shannon index and Simpson index demonstrated the diversity of biliary bacterial flora. The bacterial flora distribution was explored from different levels of phylum, class, order, family, genus and species. Chi-square test and t test were performed for statistical analysis. \n \n \nResults \nThe Chao1 estimator of the primary group was higher than that of the recurrent group (419.413±118.704 vs. 396.000±70.483), and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.130, P=0.003). At the level of the phylum, the highest abundance of bacteria in the primary group was Firmicute (56.48%), the highest abundance of bacteria in the recurrent group was Proteobacteria (57.79%). The dominant bacteria of the recurrent group was Proteobacteria, which was inconsistent with that of the primary group, and there were significant differences in the distribution of Proteobacteria and Firmicute between two groups (χ2=0.962 and -2.619, both P<0.05). At the genus level, the abundance of Bacillus and Lactococcus of the recurrent group were both lower than those of the primary group (9.75% vs. 20.77%, 10.86% vs. 22.01%, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=0.354 and 0.503, both P<0.05). The abundance of Morganella of the recurrent group was higher than that of the primary group (9.00% vs. 0.44%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=-2.025, P=0.049). At the species level, the abundance of Bacillus unclassified, Carnobacterium maltaromaticum and Bacillus circulans of the primary group were all higher than those of the recurrent group (17.78% vs. 8.84%, 2.39% vs. 1.11%, 2.59% vs. 0.74%, respectively), and the differences were all statistically significant (χ2=2.540, 2.643 and 2.515, all P<0.05). The abundance of Aeromonas veronii of recurrent group was higher than that of the primary group (2.04% vs. 0.01%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=-2.397, P=0.021). The bacteria that had significant effects in the primary group included Lactococcus (P=0.012), Lactobacillus (P=0.033) and Geobacillus (P=0.021), while in the recurrent group, which included Enterobacter (P=0.007), Aeromonadaceae (P=0.001), Actinomycetes (P=0.009), and Aeromonas (P=0.001). \n \n \nConclusions \nThere are differences in abundance and composition of biliary bacterial flora between the recurrent group and the primary group. It remains to be further studied whether the changes of some bacterial flora correlated with the recurrence of common bile duct stones. \n \n \nKey words: \nCholedocholithiasis; Recurrence of choledocholithiasis; Biliary flora; 16S rRNA","PeriodicalId":10009,"journal":{"name":"中华消化杂志","volume":"8 4","pages":"850-854"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary study on the correlation between diversity of biliary flora and recurrence of common bile duct stones\",\"authors\":\"Xiufang Zha, Shunfu Xu, Hong-xia Zhu, Xiaoxing Chen, Wenfang Cheng, Bin Xiao, Guosheng Chen, Jin-liang Ni\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.12.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the correlation between the diversity of biliary bacterial flora and the recurrence of common bile duct stones. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom September 2018 to March 2019, 48 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were enrolled and divided into primary choledocholithiasis (primary group, 38 patients) and recurrent choledocholithiasis group (recurrent group, 10 patients). The bile of the patients of the two groups was collected and analyzed with high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA. The Chao1 estimator indicated the richness of the biliary bacterial flora, and Shannon index and Simpson index demonstrated the diversity of biliary bacterial flora. The bacterial flora distribution was explored from different levels of phylum, class, order, family, genus and species. Chi-square test and t test were performed for statistical analysis. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe Chao1 estimator of the primary group was higher than that of the recurrent group (419.413±118.704 vs. 396.000±70.483), and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.130, P=0.003). At the level of the phylum, the highest abundance of bacteria in the primary group was Firmicute (56.48%), the highest abundance of bacteria in the recurrent group was Proteobacteria (57.79%). The dominant bacteria of the recurrent group was Proteobacteria, which was inconsistent with that of the primary group, and there were significant differences in the distribution of Proteobacteria and Firmicute between two groups (χ2=0.962 and -2.619, both P<0.05). At the genus level, the abundance of Bacillus and Lactococcus of the recurrent group were both lower than those of the primary group (9.75% vs. 20.77%, 10.86% vs. 22.01%, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=0.354 and 0.503, both P<0.05). The abundance of Morganella of the recurrent group was higher than that of the primary group (9.00% vs. 0.44%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=-2.025, P=0.049). At the species level, the abundance of Bacillus unclassified, Carnobacterium maltaromaticum and Bacillus circulans of the primary group were all higher than those of the recurrent group (17.78% vs. 8.84%, 2.39% vs. 1.11%, 2.59% vs. 0.74%, respectively), and the differences were all statistically significant (χ2=2.540, 2.643 and 2.515, all P<0.05). The abundance of Aeromonas veronii of recurrent group was higher than that of the primary group (2.04% vs. 0.01%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=-2.397, P=0.021). The bacteria that had significant effects in the primary group included Lactococcus (P=0.012), Lactobacillus (P=0.033) and Geobacillus (P=0.021), while in the recurrent group, which included Enterobacter (P=0.007), Aeromonadaceae (P=0.001), Actinomycetes (P=0.009), and Aeromonas (P=0.001). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThere are differences in abundance and composition of biliary bacterial flora between the recurrent group and the primary group. It remains to be further studied whether the changes of some bacterial flora correlated with the recurrence of common bile duct stones. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nCholedocholithiasis; Recurrence of choledocholithiasis; Biliary flora; 16S rRNA\",\"PeriodicalId\":10009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华消化杂志\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"850-854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华消化杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.12.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.12.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨胆道菌群多样性与胆总管结石复发的关系。方法选择2018年9月至2019年3月在南京医科大学第一附属医院行内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)的患者48例,分为原发性胆总管结石组(原发性组,38例)和复发性胆总管结石组(复发组,10例)。收集两组患者胆汁,采用16S rRNA高通量测序进行分析。Chao1估计值反映了胆道菌群的丰富度,Shannon指数和Simpson指数反映了胆道菌群的多样性。从门、纲、目、科、属、种等不同层次探讨了细菌区系分布。采用卡方检验和t检验进行统计学分析。结果首发组的Chao1估计值高于复发组(419.413±118.704比396.000±70.483),差异有统计学意义(t=3.130, P=0.003)。在门水平上,原生组细菌丰度最高的是厚壁菌门(56.48%),复发组细菌丰度最高的是变形菌门(57.79%)。复发组的优势菌群为变形菌门(Proteobacteria),与初发组不一致,两组间Proteobacteria和Firmicute的分布差异有统计学意义(χ2=0.962、-2.619,P<0.05)。在属水平上,复发组Bacillus和Lactococcus的丰度均低于原发组(分别为9.75%∶20.77%、10.86%∶22.01%),差异均有统计学意义(χ2=0.354、0.503,P<0.05)。复发组摩氏菌丰度高于原发组(9.00%比0.44%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=-2.025, P=0.049)。在菌种水平上,原发组未分类芽孢杆菌、恶性肉杆菌和环状芽孢杆菌的丰度均高于复发组(分别为17.78%比8.84%、2.39%比1.11%、2.59%比0.74%),差异均有统计学意义(χ2=2.540、2.643、2.515,P均<0.05)。复发组维氏气单胞菌丰度高于原发组(2.04%比0.01%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=-2.397, P=0.021)。原发组有显著作用的细菌有乳球菌(P=0.012)、乳杆菌(P=0.033)、地杆菌(P=0.021),复发组有肠杆菌(P=0.007)、气单胞菌科(P=0.001)、放线菌(P=0.009)、气单胞菌(P=0.001)。结论复发组与原发组胆道菌群的丰度和组成存在差异。某些菌群的改变是否与胆总管结石的复发有关,有待进一步研究。关键词:胆总管结石;胆总管结石复发;胆道植物;16 s rRNA
Preliminary study on the correlation between diversity of biliary flora and recurrence of common bile duct stones
Objective
To investigate the correlation between the diversity of biliary bacterial flora and the recurrence of common bile duct stones.
Methods
From September 2018 to March 2019, 48 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were enrolled and divided into primary choledocholithiasis (primary group, 38 patients) and recurrent choledocholithiasis group (recurrent group, 10 patients). The bile of the patients of the two groups was collected and analyzed with high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA. The Chao1 estimator indicated the richness of the biliary bacterial flora, and Shannon index and Simpson index demonstrated the diversity of biliary bacterial flora. The bacterial flora distribution was explored from different levels of phylum, class, order, family, genus and species. Chi-square test and t test were performed for statistical analysis.
Results
The Chao1 estimator of the primary group was higher than that of the recurrent group (419.413±118.704 vs. 396.000±70.483), and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.130, P=0.003). At the level of the phylum, the highest abundance of bacteria in the primary group was Firmicute (56.48%), the highest abundance of bacteria in the recurrent group was Proteobacteria (57.79%). The dominant bacteria of the recurrent group was Proteobacteria, which was inconsistent with that of the primary group, and there were significant differences in the distribution of Proteobacteria and Firmicute between two groups (χ2=0.962 and -2.619, both P<0.05). At the genus level, the abundance of Bacillus and Lactococcus of the recurrent group were both lower than those of the primary group (9.75% vs. 20.77%, 10.86% vs. 22.01%, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=0.354 and 0.503, both P<0.05). The abundance of Morganella of the recurrent group was higher than that of the primary group (9.00% vs. 0.44%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=-2.025, P=0.049). At the species level, the abundance of Bacillus unclassified, Carnobacterium maltaromaticum and Bacillus circulans of the primary group were all higher than those of the recurrent group (17.78% vs. 8.84%, 2.39% vs. 1.11%, 2.59% vs. 0.74%, respectively), and the differences were all statistically significant (χ2=2.540, 2.643 and 2.515, all P<0.05). The abundance of Aeromonas veronii of recurrent group was higher than that of the primary group (2.04% vs. 0.01%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=-2.397, P=0.021). The bacteria that had significant effects in the primary group included Lactococcus (P=0.012), Lactobacillus (P=0.033) and Geobacillus (P=0.021), while in the recurrent group, which included Enterobacter (P=0.007), Aeromonadaceae (P=0.001), Actinomycetes (P=0.009), and Aeromonas (P=0.001).
Conclusions
There are differences in abundance and composition of biliary bacterial flora between the recurrent group and the primary group. It remains to be further studied whether the changes of some bacterial flora correlated with the recurrence of common bile duct stones.
Key words:
Choledocholithiasis; Recurrence of choledocholithiasis; Biliary flora; 16S rRNA