{"title":"惠特拉姆外交政策中的现实主义","authors":"Changwei Chen","doi":"10.1080/14443058.2022.2107692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Internationalism and nationalism are the two of the most dominant approaches scholars use to analyse Whitlam’s foreign policy. Whitlam has been depicted as a leader pursuing a more independent Australian stance in international affairs in the era of “new nationalism” and an internationalist who led Australia’s close engagement with the United Nations, its agencies and multilateralism. Both internationalism and nationalism are characteristically seen as special forms of the doctrine of idealism. However, Whitlam’s foreign policy can be better understood as adhering closely to traditional realist theory. His handling of international affairs was not free of pragmatic political calculations: he promoted certain liberal ideals either when they did not matter or when Australia was irrelevant to the outcome. In this way, his foreign policy was liberalism in the abstract and realism in the hard reality.","PeriodicalId":51817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Australian Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"465 - 481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realism in Whitlam’s Foreign Policy\",\"authors\":\"Changwei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14443058.2022.2107692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Internationalism and nationalism are the two of the most dominant approaches scholars use to analyse Whitlam’s foreign policy. Whitlam has been depicted as a leader pursuing a more independent Australian stance in international affairs in the era of “new nationalism” and an internationalist who led Australia’s close engagement with the United Nations, its agencies and multilateralism. Both internationalism and nationalism are characteristically seen as special forms of the doctrine of idealism. However, Whitlam’s foreign policy can be better understood as adhering closely to traditional realist theory. His handling of international affairs was not free of pragmatic political calculations: he promoted certain liberal ideals either when they did not matter or when Australia was irrelevant to the outcome. In this way, his foreign policy was liberalism in the abstract and realism in the hard reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Australian Studies\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"465 - 481\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Australian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2022.2107692\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Australian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2022.2107692","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT Internationalism and nationalism are the two of the most dominant approaches scholars use to analyse Whitlam’s foreign policy. Whitlam has been depicted as a leader pursuing a more independent Australian stance in international affairs in the era of “new nationalism” and an internationalist who led Australia’s close engagement with the United Nations, its agencies and multilateralism. Both internationalism and nationalism are characteristically seen as special forms of the doctrine of idealism. However, Whitlam’s foreign policy can be better understood as adhering closely to traditional realist theory. His handling of international affairs was not free of pragmatic political calculations: he promoted certain liberal ideals either when they did not matter or when Australia was irrelevant to the outcome. In this way, his foreign policy was liberalism in the abstract and realism in the hard reality.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Australian Studies (JAS) is the journal of the International Australian Studies Association (InASA). In print since the mid-1970s, in the last few decades JAS has been involved in some of the most important discussion about the past, present and future of Australia. The Journal of Australian Studies is a fully refereed, international quarterly journal which publishes scholarly articles and reviews on Australian culture, society, politics, history and literature. The editorial practice is to promote and include multi- and interdisciplinary work.