同步多发早期胃癌与单发早期胃癌的临床病理特征比较

Guangxia Chen, Chuannan Wu, Haihan Zhang, Li-yong Gao, Jin Ding, Liu Shiyu
{"title":"同步多发早期胃癌与单发早期胃癌的临床病理特征比较","authors":"Guangxia Chen, Chuannan Wu, Haihan Zhang, Li-yong Gao, Jin Ding, Liu Shiyu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2018.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the clinicopathological features and correlation between synchronous multiple early gastric cancer(SMEGC)and single early gastric cancer (EGC). \n \n \nMethods \nFrom January 2008 to December 2016, the clinical data of 994 patients with EGC who underwent open or laparoscopic gastrectomy surgery were collected from the electronic medical data base of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and Xuzhou No.1 People′s Hospital. The data of patients including gender, age, tumor morphologys, tumor location, tumor size, histological type, depth of invasion, lymph nodes metastasis, lymphovascular metastasis, peripheral nerve invasion, and blood types were analyzed. T test and Chi square test were used for statistical analysis. \n \n \nResults \nAmong 994 EGC patients, 27 cases (2.7%) were SMEGC, and 967 cases (97.3%) were single EGC. The percentage of male and female of single EGC were 71.4% (690/967) and 28.6% (277/967), respectively; the percentage of male and female of SMEGC were 88.9% (24/27) and 11.1%(3/27), respectively, and there was statistically significant difference in the gender composition ratio between single EGC and SMEGC (χ2=3.975, P=0.046). The incidence of ulcer in single EGC and SMEGC were 50.6% (489/967) and 29.6% (8/27), respectively, and the difference in the incidence of ulcers between single EGC and SMEGC was statistically significant (χ2=4.653, P=0.031). There were no statistically significant differences between single EGC and SMEGC in gross morphology, depth of invasion, lymph nodes metastasis, lymphovascular metastasis, peripheral nerve invasion, tumor location, pathological type and blood types (all P>0.05). In the SMEGC patients, the incidence of main lesions invading the mucosa was 48.1% (13/27) and submucosa invasion was 51.9% (14/27); and for minor lesions, the corresponding incidences were 77.8% (21/27) and 22.2% (6/27), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.063, P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe main risk factors of SMEGC are male and no ulcerative lesions. The clinicopathological features are similar between main lesions and minor lesions in SMEGC. \n \n \nKey words: \nSynchronous multiple early gastric cancer; Main lesions; Minor lesions; Clinicopathological features","PeriodicalId":10009,"journal":{"name":"中华消化杂志","volume":"135 44","pages":"806-810"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the clinicopathological features between synchronous multiple early gastric cancer and single early gastric cancer\",\"authors\":\"Guangxia Chen, Chuannan Wu, Haihan Zhang, Li-yong Gao, Jin Ding, Liu Shiyu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2018.12.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the clinicopathological features and correlation between synchronous multiple early gastric cancer(SMEGC)and single early gastric cancer (EGC). \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom January 2008 to December 2016, the clinical data of 994 patients with EGC who underwent open or laparoscopic gastrectomy surgery were collected from the electronic medical data base of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and Xuzhou No.1 People′s Hospital. The data of patients including gender, age, tumor morphologys, tumor location, tumor size, histological type, depth of invasion, lymph nodes metastasis, lymphovascular metastasis, peripheral nerve invasion, and blood types were analyzed. T test and Chi square test were used for statistical analysis. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAmong 994 EGC patients, 27 cases (2.7%) were SMEGC, and 967 cases (97.3%) were single EGC. The percentage of male and female of single EGC were 71.4% (690/967) and 28.6% (277/967), respectively; the percentage of male and female of SMEGC were 88.9% (24/27) and 11.1%(3/27), respectively, and there was statistically significant difference in the gender composition ratio between single EGC and SMEGC (χ2=3.975, P=0.046). The incidence of ulcer in single EGC and SMEGC were 50.6% (489/967) and 29.6% (8/27), respectively, and the difference in the incidence of ulcers between single EGC and SMEGC was statistically significant (χ2=4.653, P=0.031). There were no statistically significant differences between single EGC and SMEGC in gross morphology, depth of invasion, lymph nodes metastasis, lymphovascular metastasis, peripheral nerve invasion, tumor location, pathological type and blood types (all P>0.05). In the SMEGC patients, the incidence of main lesions invading the mucosa was 48.1% (13/27) and submucosa invasion was 51.9% (14/27); and for minor lesions, the corresponding incidences were 77.8% (21/27) and 22.2% (6/27), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.063, P 0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe main risk factors of SMEGC are male and no ulcerative lesions. The clinicopathological features are similar between main lesions and minor lesions in SMEGC. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nSynchronous multiple early gastric cancer; Main lesions; Minor lesions; Clinicopathological features\",\"PeriodicalId\":10009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华消化杂志\",\"volume\":\"135 44\",\"pages\":\"806-810\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华消化杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2018.12.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2018.12.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨同步多发早期胃癌(SMEGC)与单发早期胃癌(EGC)的临床病理特征及相关性。方法收集2008年1月至2016年12月南京医科大学第一附属医院和徐州市第一人民医院电子医疗数据库中994例行开放式或腹腔镜胃切除术的EGC患者的临床资料。分析患者的性别、年龄、肿瘤形态、肿瘤位置、肿瘤大小、组织学类型、浸润深度、淋巴结转移、淋巴血管转移、周围神经侵犯、血型等资料。采用T检验和卡方检验进行统计分析。结果994例EGC中,单纯性EGC 27例(2.7%),单纯性EGC 967例(97.3%)。单次EGC男、女分别占71.4%(690/967)和28.6% (277/967);单个EGC与SMEGC的性别构成比差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.975, P=0.046),其中男性占88.9%(24/27),女性占11.1%(3/27)。单发EGC与SMEGC的溃疡发生率分别为50.6%(489/967)、29.6%(8/27),单发EGC与SMEGC的溃疡发生率差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.653, P=0.031)。单个EGC与SMEGC在大体形态、浸润深度、淋巴结转移、淋巴血管转移、周围神经侵犯、肿瘤位置、病理分型、血型等方面差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。SMEGC患者主要病变侵袭粘膜的发生率为48.1%(13/27),粘膜下层病变侵袭率为51.9% (14/27);轻微病变发生率分别为77.8%(21/27)、22.2%(6/27),差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.063, p0.05)。结论SMEGC的主要危险因素为男性,无溃疡性病变。SMEGC的主要病变和次要病变的临床病理特征相似。关键词:同步多发早期胃癌;主要病变;微小病变;临床病理特征
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the clinicopathological features between synchronous multiple early gastric cancer and single early gastric cancer
Objective To investigate the clinicopathological features and correlation between synchronous multiple early gastric cancer(SMEGC)and single early gastric cancer (EGC). Methods From January 2008 to December 2016, the clinical data of 994 patients with EGC who underwent open or laparoscopic gastrectomy surgery were collected from the electronic medical data base of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and Xuzhou No.1 People′s Hospital. The data of patients including gender, age, tumor morphologys, tumor location, tumor size, histological type, depth of invasion, lymph nodes metastasis, lymphovascular metastasis, peripheral nerve invasion, and blood types were analyzed. T test and Chi square test were used for statistical analysis. Results Among 994 EGC patients, 27 cases (2.7%) were SMEGC, and 967 cases (97.3%) were single EGC. The percentage of male and female of single EGC were 71.4% (690/967) and 28.6% (277/967), respectively; the percentage of male and female of SMEGC were 88.9% (24/27) and 11.1%(3/27), respectively, and there was statistically significant difference in the gender composition ratio between single EGC and SMEGC (χ2=3.975, P=0.046). The incidence of ulcer in single EGC and SMEGC were 50.6% (489/967) and 29.6% (8/27), respectively, and the difference in the incidence of ulcers between single EGC and SMEGC was statistically significant (χ2=4.653, P=0.031). There were no statistically significant differences between single EGC and SMEGC in gross morphology, depth of invasion, lymph nodes metastasis, lymphovascular metastasis, peripheral nerve invasion, tumor location, pathological type and blood types (all P>0.05). In the SMEGC patients, the incidence of main lesions invading the mucosa was 48.1% (13/27) and submucosa invasion was 51.9% (14/27); and for minor lesions, the corresponding incidences were 77.8% (21/27) and 22.2% (6/27), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.063, P 0.05). Conclusions The main risk factors of SMEGC are male and no ulcerative lesions. The clinicopathological features are similar between main lesions and minor lesions in SMEGC. Key words: Synchronous multiple early gastric cancer; Main lesions; Minor lesions; Clinicopathological features
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8016
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal symptoms and liver function injury in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 Clinical characteristics of 70 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 accompanied with diarrhea Pay attention to the etiological analysis and management of 2019 coronavirus disease associated liver injury Considerations and suggestions on clinical research for coronavirus disease 2019 Digestive system manifestations and analysis of disease severity in 54 patients with coronavirus disease 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1